Barriers and facilitators to using self-sampled tests for the human papillomavirus (HPV): a mixed-methods study to inform a horizon scan.

IF 3 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Soheila Ghasri, Eugenie Evelynne Johnson, Bethan Molly Harris, Imogen Forsythe, Claire Eastaugh, Adetutu Sadiq, Nick Meader, Matthew Breckons, Fiona Pearson
{"title":"Barriers and facilitators to using self-sampled tests for the human papillomavirus (HPV): a mixed-methods study to inform a horizon scan.","authors":"Soheila Ghasri, Eugenie Evelynne Johnson, Bethan Molly Harris, Imogen Forsythe, Claire Eastaugh, Adetutu Sadiq, Nick Meader, Matthew Breckons, Fiona Pearson","doi":"10.1017/S0266462326103729","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Human papillomavirus (HPV), particularly high-risk types such as HPV 16 and 18, is a major cause of cervical cancer and other cancers. Despite the United Kingdom's (UK's) commitment to cervical cancer elimination by 2040, participation in HPV screening is declining, disproportionately affecting underserved groups, including those experiencing poverty, people from minoritized racial, ethnic, gender, or sexual identity groups, and people living with HIV.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a mixed-methods study to explore awareness, barriers, and facilitators to HPV self-sampling from clinician and public perspectives. A multi-stakeholder survey (<i>n</i> = 105) and two online focus groups with clinicians (<i>n</i> = 4) and members of the public (<i>n</i> = 5) were undertaken.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Survey respondents identified accuracy, cost-free availability, ease of use, accessibility, clear instructions, and adequate follow-up as critical test features. Participants emphasized that disability, cultural context, language, and socioeconomic status strongly influence barriers and facilitators to uptake. Focus groups provided contextual depth, illustrating how privacy, logistical and emotional impacts, and supportive follow-up pathways shaped acceptability and trust. Clinicians highlighted the need for integration into healthcare infrastructure to maintain trust and ensure support. Public participants recommended community-driven engagement, including multilingual instructions and tailored communication to encourage adoption among diverse groups. Concerns were raised about unintended consequences, such as anxiety following asymptomatic HPV diagnoses and challenges in managing clinical pathways after positive results. Suggestions included leveraging community organizations to reduce hesitancy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings highlight policy and implementation considerations for embedding HPV self-sampling within care pathways to improve uptake and reduce inequalities.</p>","PeriodicalId":14467,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care","volume":" ","pages":"e46"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13161927/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266462326103729","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Human papillomavirus (HPV), particularly high-risk types such as HPV 16 and 18, is a major cause of cervical cancer and other cancers. Despite the United Kingdom's (UK's) commitment to cervical cancer elimination by 2040, participation in HPV screening is declining, disproportionately affecting underserved groups, including those experiencing poverty, people from minoritized racial, ethnic, gender, or sexual identity groups, and people living with HIV.

Methods: We conducted a mixed-methods study to explore awareness, barriers, and facilitators to HPV self-sampling from clinician and public perspectives. A multi-stakeholder survey (n = 105) and two online focus groups with clinicians (n = 4) and members of the public (n = 5) were undertaken.

Results: Survey respondents identified accuracy, cost-free availability, ease of use, accessibility, clear instructions, and adequate follow-up as critical test features. Participants emphasized that disability, cultural context, language, and socioeconomic status strongly influence barriers and facilitators to uptake. Focus groups provided contextual depth, illustrating how privacy, logistical and emotional impacts, and supportive follow-up pathways shaped acceptability and trust. Clinicians highlighted the need for integration into healthcare infrastructure to maintain trust and ensure support. Public participants recommended community-driven engagement, including multilingual instructions and tailored communication to encourage adoption among diverse groups. Concerns were raised about unintended consequences, such as anxiety following asymptomatic HPV diagnoses and challenges in managing clinical pathways after positive results. Suggestions included leveraging community organizations to reduce hesitancy.

Conclusions: Findings highlight policy and implementation considerations for embedding HPV self-sampling within care pathways to improve uptake and reduce inequalities.

使用人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)自我抽样检测的障碍和促进因素:一项为水平扫描提供信息的混合方法研究
目的:人类乳头瘤病毒(HPV),特别是高危类型,如HPV 16和18,是宫颈癌和其他癌症的主要原因。尽管英国承诺到2040年消除宫颈癌,但HPV筛查的参与率正在下降,不成比例地影响到服务不足的群体,包括贫困人群、少数种族、民族、性别或性认同群体以及艾滋病毒感染者。方法:我们进行了一项混合方法研究,从临床医生和公众的角度探讨HPV自我抽样的意识、障碍和促进因素。多利益相关者调查(n = 105)和两个在线焦点小组进行了临床医生(n = 4)和公众成员(n = 5)。结果:调查对象确定了准确性、免费可用性、易用性、可访问性、清晰的说明和充分的跟踪作为关键的测试特征。与会者强调,残疾、文化背景、语言和社会经济地位对吸收障碍和促进因素有很大影响。焦点小组提供了上下文深度,说明了隐私、后勤和情感影响以及支持性后续途径如何塑造可接受性和信任。临床医生强调需要整合到医疗保健基础设施中,以保持信任并确保支持。公众参与者建议社区主导的参与,包括多语言指导和量身定制的沟通,以鼓励不同群体的采用。对意想不到的后果提出了担忧,例如无症状HPV诊断后的焦虑以及阳性结果后管理临床途径的挑战。建议包括利用社区组织来减少犹豫。结论:研究结果强调了在护理途径中嵌入HPV自我抽样的政策和实施考虑,以改善吸收和减少不平等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
15.60%
发文量
116
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care serves as a forum for the wide range of health policy makers and professionals interested in the economic, social, ethical, medical and public health implications of health technology. It covers the development, evaluation, diffusion and use of health technology, as well as its impact on the organization and management of health care systems and public health. In addition to general essays and research reports, regular columns on technology assessment reports and thematic sections are published.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书