Therapy-induced cardiotoxicity in drug-resistant tuberculosis patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Lies Dina Liastuti, Kelvin Kohar, Haifa Mayang Lestari, Armalya Pritazahra
{"title":"Therapy-induced cardiotoxicity in drug-resistant tuberculosis patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Lies Dina Liastuti, Kelvin Kohar, Haifa Mayang Lestari, Armalya Pritazahra","doi":"10.21542/gcsp.2025.53","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Drug-resistant tuberculosis remains a major public health challenge with substantial associated morbidity and mortality. Management requires complex, individualized treatment regimens. Emerging evidence suggests that contemporary antituberculosis agents for drug-resistant disease carry significant cardiotoxicity risk. This study aims to evaluate the cardiovascular toxicity of current therapeutic regimens in patients with multidrug-resistant, pre-extensively drug-resistant, and extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines. A comprehensive literature search was performed across five databases (PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, ProQuest, and Springer) through May 5, 2024. Methodological quality was assessed using NHLBU study quality assessment tools for controlled intervention studies. Statistical analyses were conducted using a random-effects model with the DerSimonian-Laird method, with results reported as pooled estimates with 95% confidence intervals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight studies comprising 9,506 patients with multidrug-resistant, pre-extensively drug-resistant, and extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis were included. Bedaquiline without delamanid was associated with the greatest QTc prolongation [pooled mean difference: 21.9 ms (95% CI [10.24-33.62])] and highest prevalence of clinically significant QTc prolongation [21.2% (95% CI [8.6-22.8]%)]. Treatment discontinuation rates were similar for bedaquiline monotherapy and bedaquiline-delamanid combination therapy [8% (95% CI [2-18]%) vs. 8% (95% CI [0-21]%)].</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Drug resistant tuberculosis treatments were associated with cardiotoxicity concerns, evidenced by its QT prolongation, clinically significant arrhythmia, and treatment discontinuation.</p>","PeriodicalId":12669,"journal":{"name":"Global Cardiology Science & Practice","volume":"2025 5","pages":"e202553"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13070233/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Cardiology Science & Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21542/gcsp.2025.53","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Drug-resistant tuberculosis remains a major public health challenge with substantial associated morbidity and mortality. Management requires complex, individualized treatment regimens. Emerging evidence suggests that contemporary antituberculosis agents for drug-resistant disease carry significant cardiotoxicity risk. This study aims to evaluate the cardiovascular toxicity of current therapeutic regimens in patients with multidrug-resistant, pre-extensively drug-resistant, and extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis.

Methods: This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines. A comprehensive literature search was performed across five databases (PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, ProQuest, and Springer) through May 5, 2024. Methodological quality was assessed using NHLBU study quality assessment tools for controlled intervention studies. Statistical analyses were conducted using a random-effects model with the DerSimonian-Laird method, with results reported as pooled estimates with 95% confidence intervals.

Results: Eight studies comprising 9,506 patients with multidrug-resistant, pre-extensively drug-resistant, and extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis were included. Bedaquiline without delamanid was associated with the greatest QTc prolongation [pooled mean difference: 21.9 ms (95% CI [10.24-33.62])] and highest prevalence of clinically significant QTc prolongation [21.2% (95% CI [8.6-22.8]%)]. Treatment discontinuation rates were similar for bedaquiline monotherapy and bedaquiline-delamanid combination therapy [8% (95% CI [2-18]%) vs. 8% (95% CI [0-21]%)].

Conclusion: Drug resistant tuberculosis treatments were associated with cardiotoxicity concerns, evidenced by its QT prolongation, clinically significant arrhythmia, and treatment discontinuation.

耐药结核患者治疗诱导的心脏毒性:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景:耐药结核病仍然是一个重大的公共卫生挑战,具有大量相关的发病率和死亡率。治疗需要复杂的、个性化的治疗方案。新出现的证据表明,用于耐药疾病的当代抗结核药物具有显著的心脏毒性风险。本研究旨在评估当前治疗方案对多重耐药、预广泛耐药和广泛耐药结核病患者的心血管毒性。方法:本系统综述和荟萃分析遵循PRISMA指南进行。在2024年5月5日之前,对5个数据库(PubMed、Cochrane Library、Scopus、ProQuest和施普林格)进行了全面的文献检索。采用对照干预研究的NHLBU研究质量评估工具对方法学质量进行评估。采用dersimonan - laird方法的随机效应模型进行统计分析,结果报告为95%置信区间的汇总估计。结果:8项研究纳入了9506例耐多药、预广泛耐药和广泛耐药结核病患者。贝达喹啉不加delamanid与最大的QTc延长相关[合并平均差:21.9 ms (95% CI[10.24-33.62])]和最高的临床显著QTc延长患病率[21.2% (95% CI[8.6-22.8]%)]。贝达喹啉单药治疗和贝达喹啉-德拉马尼联合治疗的停药率相似[8% (95% CI[2-18]%)对8% (95% CI[0-21]%)]。结论:耐药结核治疗与心脏毒性有关,其QT间期延长、临床显著性心律失常和停药证明了这一点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Global Cardiology Science & Practice
Global Cardiology Science & Practice Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书