Successful Simultaneous Peritoneal Dialysis Catheter Removal and Reinsertion During Surgical Repair of Acute Small Bowel Perforation: A Case Report.

Case Reports in Nephrology Pub Date : 2026-04-11 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1155/crin/8739668
Pannawat Mongkolrattanakul, Chote Jitopas, Vatcharee Chareonphaibul, Kittiphan Chienwichai
{"title":"Successful Simultaneous Peritoneal Dialysis Catheter Removal and Reinsertion During Surgical Repair of Acute Small Bowel Perforation: A Case Report.","authors":"Pannawat Mongkolrattanakul, Chote Jitopas, Vatcharee Chareonphaibul, Kittiphan Chienwichai","doi":"10.1155/crin/8739668","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Bowel perforation is a rare but serious complication of Tenckhoff catheter placement for peritoneal dialysis (PD), particularly when blind insertion techniques such as the Seldinger method are used. Standard management typically involves catheter removal, surgical repair of the bowel, and delayed reinsertion of a new catheter following completion of systemic antibiotic therapy. Although this approach minimizes the risk of infection, it necessitates a second surgical procedure and can significantly delay the initiation of PD. We report the case of a 60-year-old woman with end-stage kidney disease secondary to diabetic nephropathy who developed small bowel perforation during Tenckhoff catheter insertion via the Seldinger technique. To avoid a second operation, and in accordance with the patient's preference, simultaneous catheter removal and contralateral reinsertion were performed during surgical repair of the perforation. The peritoneal cavity was irrigated with 2.5 L of normal saline, a drain was placed, and the patient received a 14-day course of intravenous meropenem with peritoneal rest. The drain was removed on postoperative Day 5, and automated PD was successfully resumed two weeks later without any evidence of peritonitis. This case suggests that simultaneous catheter removal and reinsertion during bowel repair may be technically feasible under specific, favorable intraoperative conditions, potentially avoiding an additional procedure and facilitating earlier return to PD. However, this approach is not supported by current guidelines, which recommend delayed catheter reinsertion to allow adequate peritoneal healing, and should not be considered standard practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":9604,"journal":{"name":"Case Reports in Nephrology","volume":"2026 ","pages":"8739668"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13069911/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Case Reports in Nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/crin/8739668","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Bowel perforation is a rare but serious complication of Tenckhoff catheter placement for peritoneal dialysis (PD), particularly when blind insertion techniques such as the Seldinger method are used. Standard management typically involves catheter removal, surgical repair of the bowel, and delayed reinsertion of a new catheter following completion of systemic antibiotic therapy. Although this approach minimizes the risk of infection, it necessitates a second surgical procedure and can significantly delay the initiation of PD. We report the case of a 60-year-old woman with end-stage kidney disease secondary to diabetic nephropathy who developed small bowel perforation during Tenckhoff catheter insertion via the Seldinger technique. To avoid a second operation, and in accordance with the patient's preference, simultaneous catheter removal and contralateral reinsertion were performed during surgical repair of the perforation. The peritoneal cavity was irrigated with 2.5 L of normal saline, a drain was placed, and the patient received a 14-day course of intravenous meropenem with peritoneal rest. The drain was removed on postoperative Day 5, and automated PD was successfully resumed two weeks later without any evidence of peritonitis. This case suggests that simultaneous catheter removal and reinsertion during bowel repair may be technically feasible under specific, favorable intraoperative conditions, potentially avoiding an additional procedure and facilitating earlier return to PD. However, this approach is not supported by current guidelines, which recommend delayed catheter reinsertion to allow adequate peritoneal healing, and should not be considered standard practice.

急性小肠穿孔手术修复术中成功同时取出和重新插入腹膜透析导管一例报告。
肠穿孔是腹膜透析(PD)中Tenckhoff导管置入的罕见但严重的并发症,特别是当使用盲插入技术(如Seldinger法)时。标准的处理通常包括导管拔除,手术修复肠道,以及在完成全身抗生素治疗后延迟重新插入新导管。虽然这种方法可以将感染的风险降到最低,但它需要第二次手术,并且可以显著延迟PD的发生。我们报告一例60岁的妇女继发于糖尿病肾病的终末期肾病,她通过Seldinger技术在Tenckhoff导管插入期间发生小肠穿孔。为了避免第二次手术,并根据患者的喜好,在手术修复穿孔时同时拔除导管并对侧重新插入。腹腔灌洗生理盐水2.5 L,置引流管,静注美罗培南14天。术后第5天取出引流管,两周后自动PD成功恢复,无任何腹膜炎迹象。本病例提示,在特定的、有利的术中条件下,在肠修复过程中同时拔出和重新插入导管在技术上是可行的,可能避免额外的手术,并促进早期恢复PD。然而,目前的指南不支持这种方法,建议延迟导管重新插入以允许足够的腹膜愈合,不应被视为标准做法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Case Reports in Nephrology
Case Reports in Nephrology Medicine-Nephrology
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书