Malpractice claims for pancreatic cancer in Norway: claim-rates, injury domains, claim outcomes and indemnity compensation.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Annbjørg H Søreide, Karin H Edland, Andreas B Alvestad, Solveig Hodne, Kjetil Søreide
{"title":"Malpractice claims for pancreatic cancer in Norway: claim-rates, injury domains, claim outcomes and indemnity compensation.","authors":"Annbjørg H Søreide, Karin H Edland, Andreas B Alvestad, Solveig Hodne, Kjetil Søreide","doi":"10.2340/ao.v65.45500","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Pancreatic cancer is difficult to diagnose early and at a curative stage, yet little is known about errors in management. The aim of the study was to investigate malpractice claims in Norway.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>All malpractice claims filed to the Norwegian System of Patient Injury Compensation between 2015 and 2024 for pancreatic cancer were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 148 claims (median 15 [range 8-20] claims/year) were filed among 9548 patients with pancreatic cancer, for an average claim rate of 1.55% (1 claim per every 65 pancreatic cancers). Most claims were filed against hospital/specialists (n = 90), followed by general practitioners (n = 49) with nine claims towards private practice contractors (P < 0.001). A total of 33 claims (22.3%) were approved, of which 28 (85%) concerned delayed diagnosis. Radiology was involved in 18 of the 33 approvals. According to caretaker-level for the malpractice claim, approved claims were 23% for hospital-claims, with lowest approval-rate against general practitioners (12%), and highest against private contractors (66%). Median delay in diagnosis was estimated at 6 months. The outcome of the error was 'death' in 16 of 33. Prognostic loss was determined in five of 33 patients, while 12 patients had no prognostic loss despite an approved claim. Caretaker-level did not differ regarding death or prognostic loss in claims (P = 0.203). A total of 1.47 million EUR was paid in indemnity payments.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>The claim rate of 1.5% was stable, with about one in five claims approved. Diagnostic delay was the predominant cause, with several stakeholders involved across the healthcare system.</p>","PeriodicalId":7110,"journal":{"name":"Acta Oncologica","volume":"65 ","pages":"273-281"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13084995/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Oncologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2340/ao.v65.45500","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose: Pancreatic cancer is difficult to diagnose early and at a curative stage, yet little is known about errors in management. The aim of the study was to investigate malpractice claims in Norway.

Patients and methods: All malpractice claims filed to the Norwegian System of Patient Injury Compensation between 2015 and 2024 for pancreatic cancer were evaluated.

Results: A total of 148 claims (median 15 [range 8-20] claims/year) were filed among 9548 patients with pancreatic cancer, for an average claim rate of 1.55% (1 claim per every 65 pancreatic cancers). Most claims were filed against hospital/specialists (n = 90), followed by general practitioners (n = 49) with nine claims towards private practice contractors (P < 0.001). A total of 33 claims (22.3%) were approved, of which 28 (85%) concerned delayed diagnosis. Radiology was involved in 18 of the 33 approvals. According to caretaker-level for the malpractice claim, approved claims were 23% for hospital-claims, with lowest approval-rate against general practitioners (12%), and highest against private contractors (66%). Median delay in diagnosis was estimated at 6 months. The outcome of the error was 'death' in 16 of 33. Prognostic loss was determined in five of 33 patients, while 12 patients had no prognostic loss despite an approved claim. Caretaker-level did not differ regarding death or prognostic loss in claims (P = 0.203). A total of 1.47 million EUR was paid in indemnity payments.

Interpretation: The claim rate of 1.5% was stable, with about one in five claims approved. Diagnostic delay was the predominant cause, with several stakeholders involved across the healthcare system.

挪威胰腺癌的医疗事故索赔:索赔率,伤害领域,索赔结果和赔偿。
背景与目的:胰腺癌在早期和治疗阶段很难诊断,但对治疗错误知之甚少。这项研究的目的是调查挪威的医疗事故索赔。患者和方法:对2015年至2024年间提交给挪威患者伤害赔偿系统的所有胰腺癌医疗事故索赔进行评估。结果:9548例胰腺癌患者共提出148项索赔(中位数15项[范围8-20]/年),平均索赔率为1.55%(每65例胰腺癌中有1项索赔)。大多数索赔是针对医院/专科医生(n = 90),其次是全科医生(n = 49),有9起索赔是针对私人执业承包商(P < 0.001)。共批准了33项索赔(22.3%),其中28项(85%)涉及延迟诊断。在33个获批的药物中,有18个涉及放射学。根据医疗事故索赔的看护级别,医院索赔的批准率为23%,全科医生的批准率最低(12%),私人承包商的批准率最高(66%)。诊断延迟的中位数估计为6个月。33个错误中有16个是“死亡”。33例患者中有5例预后损失,而12例患者尽管有批准的索赔,但没有预后损失。在死亡和预后损失方面,护理人员水平没有差异(P = 0.203)。总共支付了147万欧元的赔偿款。解读:1.5%的理赔率较为稳定,约五分之一的理赔获批。诊断延迟是主要原因,涉及整个医疗保健系统的几个利益相关者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Oncologica
Acta Oncologica 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
3.20%
发文量
301
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Acta Oncologica is a journal for the clinical oncologist and accepts articles within all fields of clinical cancer research. Articles on tumour pathology, experimental oncology, radiobiology, cancer epidemiology and medical radio physics are also welcome, especially if they have a clinical aim or interest. Scientific articles on cancer nursing and psychological or social aspects of cancer are also welcomed. Extensive material may be published as Supplements, for which special conditions apply.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书