Determining Access for a City-Wide Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (ECPR) Initiative Using Geospatial Analysis.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Christiana K Prucnal, Melissa A Meeker, Rebecca E Cash, Erica L Nelson, P Gregg Greenough, Stephen D Hallisey, Annette M Ilg, Christopher Kabrhel, Raghu R Seethala, Paul S Jansson
{"title":"Determining Access for a City-Wide Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (ECPR) Initiative Using Geospatial Analysis.","authors":"Christiana K Prucnal, Melissa A Meeker, Rebecca E Cash, Erica L Nelson, P Gregg Greenough, Stephen D Hallisey, Annette M Ilg, Christopher Kabrhel, Raghu R Seethala, Paul S Jansson","doi":"10.1111/acem.70288","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In select situations, patients experiencing out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) may be candidates for extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR). Eligibility criteria for ECPR typically include a maximum time (usually 30 min) from arrest to arrival at an ECPR-capable center, which may exclude populations based on geographic factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using geospatial modeling, we calculated drive times to ECPR-capable hospitals in Boston utilizing census block group centroid coordinates as proxy sites for OHCA locations. We used a fixed dispatch-to-scene arrival time of 7.4 min, extrapolated from Boston EMS median transport time data. We set conditions at the 50th (24 min), 25th (18 min), and 10th (13 min) percentiles for EMS on-scene time and, for each condition, determined access to ECPR with an arrest to arrival criterion of less than 30 min. We analyzed the effect of high- versus low-traffic conditions and then derived the arrest to arrival time necessary to achieve access for 90% of the city.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The entire City of Boston was excluded from ECPR with median times and current eligibility criteria. Decreasing time-on-scene to the 25th percentile led to increased access: 16% of block groups with low traffic and 6% of block groups with high traffic. At the 10th percentile for time-on-scene, 55% of block groups had access with low traffic and 28% had access with high traffic. To achieve access for 90% of the city under high-traffic conditions at the 50th percentile for time-on-scene, the criterion for arrest to arrival would need to be extended to 55.8 min.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The current arrest to arrival criterion for ECPR excludes the entire City of Boston using median transportation and on-scene times. Increasing access to ECPR should include efforts to decrease prehospital duration, such as minimizing time-on-scene for potential OHCA cases. Future study should examine potential levers to improve access, such as novel prehospital ECPR delivery models, air-based transport, and liberalized arrest to arrival criteria.</p>","PeriodicalId":7105,"journal":{"name":"Academic Emergency Medicine","volume":"33 4","pages":"e70288"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13075459/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/acem.70288","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In select situations, patients experiencing out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) may be candidates for extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR). Eligibility criteria for ECPR typically include a maximum time (usually 30 min) from arrest to arrival at an ECPR-capable center, which may exclude populations based on geographic factors.

Methods: Using geospatial modeling, we calculated drive times to ECPR-capable hospitals in Boston utilizing census block group centroid coordinates as proxy sites for OHCA locations. We used a fixed dispatch-to-scene arrival time of 7.4 min, extrapolated from Boston EMS median transport time data. We set conditions at the 50th (24 min), 25th (18 min), and 10th (13 min) percentiles for EMS on-scene time and, for each condition, determined access to ECPR with an arrest to arrival criterion of less than 30 min. We analyzed the effect of high- versus low-traffic conditions and then derived the arrest to arrival time necessary to achieve access for 90% of the city.

Results: The entire City of Boston was excluded from ECPR with median times and current eligibility criteria. Decreasing time-on-scene to the 25th percentile led to increased access: 16% of block groups with low traffic and 6% of block groups with high traffic. At the 10th percentile for time-on-scene, 55% of block groups had access with low traffic and 28% had access with high traffic. To achieve access for 90% of the city under high-traffic conditions at the 50th percentile for time-on-scene, the criterion for arrest to arrival would need to be extended to 55.8 min.

Conclusions: The current arrest to arrival criterion for ECPR excludes the entire City of Boston using median transportation and on-scene times. Increasing access to ECPR should include efforts to decrease prehospital duration, such as minimizing time-on-scene for potential OHCA cases. Future study should examine potential levers to improve access, such as novel prehospital ECPR delivery models, air-based transport, and liberalized arrest to arrival criteria.

利用地理空间分析确定城市范围内体外心肺复苏(ECPR)计划的可及性。
背景:在特定情况下,院外心脏骤停(OHCA)的患者可能是体外心肺复苏(ECPR)的候选者。ECPR的资格标准通常包括从逮捕到到达具有ECPR能力的中心的最长时间(通常为30分钟),这可能会根据地理因素排除人群。方法:利用地理空间模型,我们利用人口普查街区群质心坐标作为OHCA位置的代理站点,计算了前往波士顿具有ecpr能力的医院的开车时间。我们使用了从波士顿EMS中位数运输时间数据推断的7.4分钟的固定调度到现场到达时间。我们将EMS现场时间设定为第50(24分钟)、第25(18分钟)和第10(13分钟)个百分位数,并在每种情况下确定以小于30分钟的骤停至到达标准进行ECPR。我们分析了高流量和低流量条件的影响,然后得出了达到90%的城市所需的停留到到达时间。结果:整个波士顿市以中位时间和当前的资格标准被排除在ECPR之外。将现场时间减少到第25个百分位数导致访问增加:16%的流量低的街区组和6%的流量高的街区组。在现场时间的第10个百分位数,55%的街区组访问低流量,28%访问高流量。为了在高交通条件下达到90%的城市在现场时间的第50百分位数,从逮捕到到达的标准需要延长到55.8分钟。结论:目前ECPR的逮捕到到达标准不包括整个波士顿市,使用中位数交通和现场时间。增加获得ECPR的机会应包括努力减少院前持续时间,例如尽量减少潜在OHCA病例的现场时间。未来的研究应检查改善准入的潜在杠杆,如新的院前ECPR交付模式、空中运输和放宽到达标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Academic Emergency Medicine
Academic Emergency Medicine 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
6.80%
发文量
207
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Academic Emergency Medicine (AEM) is the official monthly publication of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine (SAEM) and publishes information relevant to the practice, educational advancements, and investigation of emergency medicine. It is the second-largest peer-reviewed scientific journal in the specialty of emergency medicine. The goal of AEM is to advance the science, education, and clinical practice of emergency medicine, to serve as a voice for the academic emergency medicine community, and to promote SAEM''s goals and objectives. Members and non-members worldwide depend on this journal for translational medicine relevant to emergency medicine, as well as for clinical news, case studies and more. Each issue contains information relevant to the research, educational advancements, and practice in emergency medicine. Subject matter is diverse, including preclinical studies, clinical topics, health policy, and educational methods. The research of SAEM members contributes significantly to the scientific content and development of the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书