The unheard ‘scandal’: Covid-19 vaccine-injured people's perceptions of the national redress scheme and trust in the government in the United Kingdom

IF 1.4 3区 社会学 Q1 LAW
Journal of Law and Society Pub Date : 2026-04-09 Epub Date: 2026-02-18 DOI:10.1111/jols.70047
FANNI GYURKO Dr, SONIA MACLEOD Dr
{"title":"The unheard ‘scandal’: Covid-19 vaccine-injured people's perceptions of the national redress scheme and trust in the government in the United Kingdom","authors":"FANNI GYURKO Dr,&nbsp;SONIA MACLEOD Dr","doi":"10.1111/jols.70047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article examines 218 Covid-19 vaccine-injured people's experiences of the process of seeking redress from the UK Government's Vaccine Damage Payment Scheme (VDPS). Moreover, it engages with the wider topic of how we can understand the government(s)’ role in dealing with an ‘emergency’ (the Covid-19 pandemic) and the consequent (global) health crisis. Vaccine-injured individuals and communities perceive suffering health problems after Covid-19 vaccination as a ‘tragedy’, which requires an adequate response. However, the VDPS often does not meet their expectations, which fuels the vaccine-injured community's narratives around an emerging ‘scandal’ over inadequate redress provision for those who suffered adverse effects following Covid-19 vaccines. These perceptions and meaning-making are in stark contrast to the fact that the wider population is unaffected by these issues and are generally not aware of the harms suffered or of the VDPS.</p>","PeriodicalId":51544,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Law and Society","volume":"53 S1","pages":"S151-S166"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jols.70047","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Law and Society","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jols.70047","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article examines 218 Covid-19 vaccine-injured people's experiences of the process of seeking redress from the UK Government's Vaccine Damage Payment Scheme (VDPS). Moreover, it engages with the wider topic of how we can understand the government(s)’ role in dealing with an ‘emergency’ (the Covid-19 pandemic) and the consequent (global) health crisis. Vaccine-injured individuals and communities perceive suffering health problems after Covid-19 vaccination as a ‘tragedy’, which requires an adequate response. However, the VDPS often does not meet their expectations, which fuels the vaccine-injured community's narratives around an emerging ‘scandal’ over inadequate redress provision for those who suffered adverse effects following Covid-19 vaccines. These perceptions and meaning-making are in stark contrast to the fact that the wider population is unaffected by these issues and are generally not aware of the harms suffered or of the VDPS.

闻所未闻的“丑闻”:Covid-19疫苗损害了人们对英国国家补救计划的看法和对政府的信任
本文研究了218名Covid-19疫苗伤者向英国政府的疫苗损害赔偿计划(VDPS)寻求赔偿的经历。此外,它还涉及了更广泛的主题,即我们如何理解政府在处理“紧急情况”(Covid-19大流行)和随之而来的(全球)健康危机中的作用。受疫苗伤害的个人和社区认为,在接种Covid-19疫苗后出现健康问题是一场“悲剧”,需要采取适当的应对措施。然而,VDPS往往不能满足他们的期望,这助长了疫苗受害群体对新出现的“丑闻”的叙述,即为接种Covid-19疫苗后遭受不良反应的人提供的补救措施不足。这些看法和意义形成鲜明对比的事实是,更广泛的人口不受这些问题的影响,通常不知道所遭受的伤害或VDPS。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
15.40%
发文量
59
期刊介绍: Established as the leading British periodical for Socio-Legal Studies The Journal of Law and Society offers an interdisciplinary approach. It is committed to achieving a broad international appeal, attracting contributions and addressing issues from a range of legal cultures, as well as theoretical concerns of cross- cultural interest. It produces an annual special issue, which is also published in book form. It has a widely respected Book Review section and is cited all over the world. Challenging, authoritative and topical, the journal appeals to legal researchers and practitioners as well as sociologists, criminologists and other social scientists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书