On Using the Shapley Value for Anomaly Localization: A Statistical Investigation

Rick S. Blum, Xubin Fang, Franziska Freytag
{"title":"On Using the Shapley Value for Anomaly Localization: A Statistical Investigation","authors":"Rick S. Blum,&nbsp;Xubin Fang,&nbsp;Franziska Freytag","doi":"10.1002/ail2.70024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Recent publications have suggested using the Shapley value for anomaly localization for sensor data systems. We use a reasonable statistical model for the classifiers required to compute the Shapley value to provide repeatable and rigorous analysis in the anomaly localization application. Then we provide a proof that using a single fixed term in the Shapley value calculation achieves a lower complexity anomaly localization test, with the same probability of error, as a test using the Shapley value in cases with independent observation. While it is impossible to test all possible cases numerically, we found this to be true in all the cases we tested with independent observations. For some dependent observation cases with two sensors, where only the second sensor data is anomalous, we show numerically that the Shapley value test can falsely decide an anomaly occurs at the first (nonanomalous) sensor with a probability which approaches one for increasing anomaly magnitude. On the other hand, using a single fixed term in the Shapley value calculation in these cases gives a reasonably small probability of an anomaly occurring at the first (nonanomalous) sensor for any anomaly magnitude. These results are the first of this type we have seen, could encourage new algorithm development, and should encourage future research to more fully understand these observations. A better understanding of the Shapley value, given its popularity, seems an important topic which could lead to improvements in algorithms and real implementations in the future.</p>","PeriodicalId":72253,"journal":{"name":"Applied AI letters","volume":"7 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ail2.70024","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied AI letters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ail2.70024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recent publications have suggested using the Shapley value for anomaly localization for sensor data systems. We use a reasonable statistical model for the classifiers required to compute the Shapley value to provide repeatable and rigorous analysis in the anomaly localization application. Then we provide a proof that using a single fixed term in the Shapley value calculation achieves a lower complexity anomaly localization test, with the same probability of error, as a test using the Shapley value in cases with independent observation. While it is impossible to test all possible cases numerically, we found this to be true in all the cases we tested with independent observations. For some dependent observation cases with two sensors, where only the second sensor data is anomalous, we show numerically that the Shapley value test can falsely decide an anomaly occurs at the first (nonanomalous) sensor with a probability which approaches one for increasing anomaly magnitude. On the other hand, using a single fixed term in the Shapley value calculation in these cases gives a reasonably small probability of an anomaly occurring at the first (nonanomalous) sensor for any anomaly magnitude. These results are the first of this type we have seen, could encourage new algorithm development, and should encourage future research to more fully understand these observations. A better understanding of the Shapley value, given its popularity, seems an important topic which could lead to improvements in algorithms and real implementations in the future.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

利用Shapley值进行异常定位的统计研究
最近的出版物建议使用Shapley值对传感器数据系统进行异常定位。我们对计算Shapley值所需的分类器使用合理的统计模型,为异常定位应用提供可重复和严格的分析。然后证明了在独立观测情况下,在Shapley值计算中使用单个固定项可以获得与使用Shapley值测试相同的误差概率,且复杂度较低的异常定位测试。虽然不可能在数字上测试所有可能的情况,但我们发现这在我们用独立观察测试的所有情况下都是正确的。对于一些具有两个传感器的依赖观测情况,其中只有第二个传感器数据是异常的,我们在数值上表明,Shapley值检验可以错误地确定异常发生在第一个(非异常)传感器上,其概率接近于异常幅度增加的1。另一方面,在这些情况下,在Shapley值计算中使用单个固定项,对于任何异常量级,在第一个(非异常)传感器处发生异常的概率相当小。这些结果是我们第一次看到这种类型的结果,可以鼓励新的算法开发,并且应该鼓励未来的研究更充分地理解这些观察结果。考虑到Shapley值的流行,更好地理解它似乎是一个重要的主题,它可能会导致未来算法和实际实现的改进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书