Timing of Rectal Retroflexion Does Not Reduce Patient-Reported Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial

IF 1.1 Q4 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Ahmed Al Obaidi , Morten Rose , Rasmus Kroijer , Jakob Ravn Grimm , Michael Festersen Nielsen , Sisse Helle Njor , Pernille Thordal Larsen , Magnus Ploug
{"title":"Timing of Rectal Retroflexion Does Not Reduce Patient-Reported Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial","authors":"Ahmed Al Obaidi ,&nbsp;Morten Rose ,&nbsp;Rasmus Kroijer ,&nbsp;Jakob Ravn Grimm ,&nbsp;Michael Festersen Nielsen ,&nbsp;Sisse Helle Njor ,&nbsp;Pernille Thordal Larsen ,&nbsp;Magnus Ploug","doi":"10.1016/j.tige.2026.250969","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>BACKGROUND AND AIMS</h3><div>A substantial proportion of patients experience moderate to severe discomfort during colonoscopy, which may reduce willingness to undergo future procedures. According to the “peak and end rule,” retrospective pain evaluations are disproportionately influenced by the final moments. Rectal retroflexion (“looping”) is a potentially painful maneuver typically performed at the end of colonoscopy. We aimed to investigate whether performing rectal retroflexion at the beginning rather than at the end of colonoscopy reduces patient-reported pain.</div></div><div><h3>METHODS</h3><div>A multicenter, single-blinded, randomized controlled trial was conducted at 2 hospital-based endoscopy units between September 2024 and January 2025. A total of 1118 patients scheduled for colonoscopy were randomized 1:1 to loop-first (n = 521) or loop-last (n = 529) groups. Retroflexion was performed either immediately upon rectal entry or as the final procedural step. All other aspects of colonoscopy followed routine practice. The primary outcome was pain recalled after colonoscopy, measured on a numerical rating scale (0-10). Secondary outcomes included need for supplemental sedation/analgesia, colonoscopy completion rates, and procedure times.</div></div><div><h3>RESULTS</h3><div>Median pain scores did not differ between groups (loop first vs loop last, 3 [IQR, 1-6] vs 3 [IQR, 1-5]; <em>P</em> = 0.10). Supplemental sedation/analgesia was required more frequently in the loop-first group (20.7% vs 14.9%; relative risk, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.03-1.48; <em>P</em> = 0.01). Completion rates were slightly lower in the loop-first group (91.2% vs 93.6%; relative risk, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.64-1.08; <em>P</em> = 0.14).</div></div><div><h3>CONCLUSION</h3><div>Timing of rectal retroflexion did not influence overall pain recall. However, looping at the end appears advantageous, being associated with reduced sedation use and higher completion rates. These findings support performing rectal retroflexion as the final step in colonoscopy. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06521658).</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36169,"journal":{"name":"Techniques and Innovations in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy","volume":"28 3","pages":"Article 250969"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Techniques and Innovations in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590030726000048","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

A substantial proportion of patients experience moderate to severe discomfort during colonoscopy, which may reduce willingness to undergo future procedures. According to the “peak and end rule,” retrospective pain evaluations are disproportionately influenced by the final moments. Rectal retroflexion (“looping”) is a potentially painful maneuver typically performed at the end of colonoscopy. We aimed to investigate whether performing rectal retroflexion at the beginning rather than at the end of colonoscopy reduces patient-reported pain.

METHODS

A multicenter, single-blinded, randomized controlled trial was conducted at 2 hospital-based endoscopy units between September 2024 and January 2025. A total of 1118 patients scheduled for colonoscopy were randomized 1:1 to loop-first (n = 521) or loop-last (n = 529) groups. Retroflexion was performed either immediately upon rectal entry or as the final procedural step. All other aspects of colonoscopy followed routine practice. The primary outcome was pain recalled after colonoscopy, measured on a numerical rating scale (0-10). Secondary outcomes included need for supplemental sedation/analgesia, colonoscopy completion rates, and procedure times.

RESULTS

Median pain scores did not differ between groups (loop first vs loop last, 3 [IQR, 1-6] vs 3 [IQR, 1-5]; P = 0.10). Supplemental sedation/analgesia was required more frequently in the loop-first group (20.7% vs 14.9%; relative risk, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.03-1.48; P = 0.01). Completion rates were slightly lower in the loop-first group (91.2% vs 93.6%; relative risk, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.64-1.08; P = 0.14).

CONCLUSION

Timing of rectal retroflexion did not influence overall pain recall. However, looping at the end appears advantageous, being associated with reduced sedation use and higher completion rates. These findings support performing rectal retroflexion as the final step in colonoscopy. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06521658).
直肠后屈的时机不能减轻患者报告的疼痛:一项随机对照试验
背景和AIMSA相当比例的患者在结肠镜检查期间经历中度至重度不适,这可能会降低接受未来手术的意愿。根据“峰值和终点规则”,回顾性疼痛评估不成比例地受到最后时刻的影响。直肠后屈(“环”)是一种潜在的疼痛操作,通常在结肠镜检查结束时进行。我们的目的是研究在结肠镜检查开始时而不是结肠镜检查结束时进行直肠后伸是否能减少患者报告的疼痛。方法于2024年9月至2025年1月在2家医院内窥镜检查室进行多中心、单盲、随机对照试验。1118例计划进行结肠镜检查的患者按1:1的比例随机分为循环优先组(n = 521)和循环最后组(n = 529)。在直肠入路后立即或作为最后的手术步骤进行后屈。结肠镜检查的其他方面均按常规操作。主要结局是结肠镜检查后回忆的疼痛,用数值评分量表(0-10)测量。次要结局包括需要补充镇静/镇痛、结肠镜检查完成率和手术时间。结果两组间疼痛评分中位数无差异(循环前与循环后,3 [IQR, 1-6]与3 [IQR, 1-5]; P = 0.10)。环路优先组需要补充镇静/镇痛的频率更高(20.7% vs 14.9%;相对风险1.23;95% CI, 1.03-1.48; P = 0.01)。环优先组的完成率略低(91.2% vs 93.6%;相对风险,0.83;95% CI, 0.64-1.08; P = 0.14)。结论直肠后伸的时间不影响整体疼痛回忆。然而,在最后循环似乎是有利的,与减少镇静使用和更高的完成率有关。这些发现支持在结肠镜检查的最后一步进行直肠后伸。该试验已在ClinicalTrials.gov注册(NCT06521658)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
50.00%
发文量
60
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书