Sustainable workplace safety: evidence-informed priorities for urgent cross-sector action

Oluwaseun Ruth Alara, Kennedy Adakporia Osakwe
{"title":"Sustainable workplace safety: evidence-informed priorities for urgent cross-sector action","authors":"Oluwaseun Ruth Alara,&nbsp;Kennedy Adakporia Osakwe","doi":"10.1016/j.glohj.2026.02.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Workplace safety faces mounting strain from intersecting pressures, while serious harm persists in high-risk sectors. These shifts can weaken accountability and amplify new risk pathways, creating an urgent need for cross-sector, prevention-focused actions that are equitable and robust amid uncertainty.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This review aimed to identify and prioritise urgent, cross-sector actions to strengthen sustainable workplace safety amid climate change, psychosocial harm, technological transformation, and fragmented or non-standard employment.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>An evidence-informed scoping review synthesised peer-reviewed and grey literature and incorporated stakeholder input. Transparent inclusion criteria and pragmatic evidence weighting were used to distinguish empirical evidence from standards and guidance. Priorities were set using explicit criteria, including harm severity, exposure prevalence, urgency, feasibility, time-to-impact, equity impacts, stakeholder consensus, and robustness under uncertainty.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Evidence indicated persistent serious harm in high-risk sectors, growing psychosocial injury burdens, intensifying climate-related exposures, and emerging risks linked to digitalisation, human–robot interaction, and non-standard work (including gig/platform labour), where incentive structures can amplify unsafe behaviour, particularly under extreme heat. Ten priorities were identified: embed Occupational Health and Safety in governance and incentives; strengthen worker voice, equity and inclusion; design out hazards; prevent psychosocial harm aligned with International standard organization 45003; build data, learning and a just culture; improve climate- and environment-ready safety; ensure ethical digitalisation/automation with privacy and bias safeguards; protect Small and Medium-sized Enterprises and supply chains (including “International standard organization 45001-lite” pathways); strengthen competency and lifelong learning; and improve management of transitions and fatigue.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Sustainable safety requires a shift from lagging-indicator management to governance- and design-led prevention, climate adaptation, psychosocial risk control, ethical technology governance, and equity-centred collaboration to reduce serious harm.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73164,"journal":{"name":"Global health journal (Amsterdam, Netherlands)","volume":"10 1","pages":"Pages 7-18"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global health journal (Amsterdam, Netherlands)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2414644726000059","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Workplace safety faces mounting strain from intersecting pressures, while serious harm persists in high-risk sectors. These shifts can weaken accountability and amplify new risk pathways, creating an urgent need for cross-sector, prevention-focused actions that are equitable and robust amid uncertainty.

Objective

This review aimed to identify and prioritise urgent, cross-sector actions to strengthen sustainable workplace safety amid climate change, psychosocial harm, technological transformation, and fragmented or non-standard employment.

Methods

An evidence-informed scoping review synthesised peer-reviewed and grey literature and incorporated stakeholder input. Transparent inclusion criteria and pragmatic evidence weighting were used to distinguish empirical evidence from standards and guidance. Priorities were set using explicit criteria, including harm severity, exposure prevalence, urgency, feasibility, time-to-impact, equity impacts, stakeholder consensus, and robustness under uncertainty.

Results

Evidence indicated persistent serious harm in high-risk sectors, growing psychosocial injury burdens, intensifying climate-related exposures, and emerging risks linked to digitalisation, human–robot interaction, and non-standard work (including gig/platform labour), where incentive structures can amplify unsafe behaviour, particularly under extreme heat. Ten priorities were identified: embed Occupational Health and Safety in governance and incentives; strengthen worker voice, equity and inclusion; design out hazards; prevent psychosocial harm aligned with International standard organization 45003; build data, learning and a just culture; improve climate- and environment-ready safety; ensure ethical digitalisation/automation with privacy and bias safeguards; protect Small and Medium-sized Enterprises and supply chains (including “International standard organization 45001-lite” pathways); strengthen competency and lifelong learning; and improve management of transitions and fatigue.

Conclusion

Sustainable safety requires a shift from lagging-indicator management to governance- and design-led prevention, climate adaptation, psychosocial risk control, ethical technology governance, and equity-centred collaboration to reduce serious harm.
可持续工作场所安全:基于证据的跨部门紧急行动优先事项
工作场所安全面临着来自交叉压力的越来越大的压力,而高风险行业的严重危害仍然存在。这些转变可能削弱问责制,扩大新的风险途径,迫切需要在不确定的情况下采取公平而有力的跨部门预防行动。本审查旨在确定并优先考虑紧急的跨部门行动,以加强可持续的工作场所安全,应对气候变化、社会心理伤害、技术转型以及碎片化或非标准就业。方法循证范围评估综合了同行评议文献和灰色文献,并纳入了利益相关者的意见。采用透明的纳入标准和务实的证据加权来区分经验证据与标准和指南。使用明确的标准设置优先级,包括危害严重程度、暴露流行程度、紧迫性、可行性、影响时间、公平影响、利益相关者共识和不确定性下的稳健性。结果有证据表明,高风险行业持续存在严重危害,社会心理伤害负担不断增加,气候相关暴露加剧,以及与数字化、人机交互和非标准工作(包括零工/平台劳动)相关的新风险,其中激励结构会放大不安全行为,特别是在极端高温下。确定了十个优先事项:将职业健康与安全纳入治理和激励措施;加强工人的声音、公平和包容;设计排除危险;预防心理社会伤害符合国际标准组织45003;建立数据、学习和公正的文化;加强气候和环境安全;确保数字化/自动化具有隐私和偏见保护;保护中小企业和供应链(包括“国际标准组织45001- life”路径);强化能力和终身学习;改善对过渡和疲劳的管理。可持续安全需要从滞后指标管理转向以治理和设计为主导的预防、气候适应、社会心理风险控制、伦理技术治理和以公平为中心的合作,以减少严重危害。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Global health journal (Amsterdam, Netherlands)
Global health journal (Amsterdam, Netherlands) Public Health and Health Policy
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书