Perinatal Belonging and Support: A Qualitative Study of Black Women's Lived Experiences in Pregnancy Resource Centers.

IF 1.5
Amanda J Pitchford, Lisa R Roberts, Anne Berit Petersen, Zane Yi
{"title":"Perinatal Belonging and Support: A Qualitative Study of Black Women's Lived Experiences in Pregnancy Resource Centers.","authors":"Amanda J Pitchford, Lisa R Roberts, Anne Berit Petersen, Zane Yi","doi":"10.1016/j.nwh.2025.12.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To present the experiences of Black women who visit pregnancy resource centers (PRCs), representing their unique voices while avoiding further marginalization surrounding such experiences.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Lived experiences of Black women were explored using an interpretative phenomenological analysis approach.</p><p><strong>Setting/local problem: </strong>Participants were recruited from PRCs in San Bernardino County, California, in August 2024.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Female participants who self-identified as Black or African American, or as mixed ethnicity of the same heritage, who visited a PRC within the previous 12 months, and who could communicate their experiences in English were recruited using a passive sample.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Semistructured interviews included four core questions and two follow-up prompts that were evaluated and approved by the Loma Linda University Institutional Review Board. The semistructured interviews were recorded, transcribed, and manually reviewed for accuracy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten participants composed the sample. Participants had positive and negative experiences during their PRC visits related to four superordinate themes: (a) NavigatingSupport and Judgment, (b) Being Seen and Heard, (c) Perceiving Community and Belonging, and (d) Experiencing Spiritual Care.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Intangible themes presented by participants underscore the critical need to integrate experiential needs into the broader framework of perinatal nursing care and support in the community-based setting. Future research should prioritize centering lived experience, alternative care models, and intersectional analysis. Prioritizing equitable and culturally responsive care practices is the responsibility of all providers and supporters concerned with perinatal outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":39985,"journal":{"name":"Nursing for Women''s Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing for Women''s Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nwh.2025.12.003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To present the experiences of Black women who visit pregnancy resource centers (PRCs), representing their unique voices while avoiding further marginalization surrounding such experiences.

Design: Lived experiences of Black women were explored using an interpretative phenomenological analysis approach.

Setting/local problem: Participants were recruited from PRCs in San Bernardino County, California, in August 2024.

Participants: Female participants who self-identified as Black or African American, or as mixed ethnicity of the same heritage, who visited a PRC within the previous 12 months, and who could communicate their experiences in English were recruited using a passive sample.

Methods: Semistructured interviews included four core questions and two follow-up prompts that were evaluated and approved by the Loma Linda University Institutional Review Board. The semistructured interviews were recorded, transcribed, and manually reviewed for accuracy.

Results: Ten participants composed the sample. Participants had positive and negative experiences during their PRC visits related to four superordinate themes: (a) NavigatingSupport and Judgment, (b) Being Seen and Heard, (c) Perceiving Community and Belonging, and (d) Experiencing Spiritual Care.

Conclusion: Intangible themes presented by participants underscore the critical need to integrate experiential needs into the broader framework of perinatal nursing care and support in the community-based setting. Future research should prioritize centering lived experience, alternative care models, and intersectional analysis. Prioritizing equitable and culturally responsive care practices is the responsibility of all providers and supporters concerned with perinatal outcomes.

围产期归属与支持:黑人妇女在妊娠资源中心生活经历的定性研究。
目的:呈现黑人妇女访问妊娠资源中心(prc)的经历,代表她们独特的声音,同时避免因这些经历而进一步边缘化。设计:使用解释性现象学分析方法探索黑人妇女的生活经历。环境/当地问题:参与者于2024年8月从加利福尼亚州圣贝纳迪诺县的prc招募。参与者:采用被动抽样方式招募自认为是黑人或非裔美国人,或具有相同血统的混合种族的女性参与者,他们在过去12个月内访问过中国,并且可以用英语交流他们的经历。方法:半结构化访谈包括四个核心问题和两个后续提示,由洛马琳达大学机构审查委员会评估和批准。这些半结构化的访谈被记录下来,转录下来,并进行人工审查以确保准确性。结果:10名参与者组成样本。参与者在中国访问期间有积极和消极的经历,涉及四个主要主题:(a)导航支持和判断,(b)被看到和听到,(c)感知社区和归属感,(d)体验精神关怀。结论:参与者提出的无形主题强调了将体验需求纳入更广泛的社区围产期护理和支持框架的迫切需要。未来的研究应优先关注生活经验、替代护理模式和交叉分析。优先考虑公平和符合文化的护理做法是所有关注围产期结果的提供者和支持者的责任。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nursing for Women''s Health
Nursing for Women''s Health Nursing-Nursing (all)
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
90
期刊介绍: Nursing for Women"s Health publishes the most recent and compelling health care information on women"s health, newborn care and professional nursing issues. As a refereed, clinical practice journal, it provides professionals involved in providing optimum nursing care for women and their newborns with health care trends and everyday issues in a concise, practical, and easy-to-read format.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书