Clinicians' Experiences and Recommendations for Implementing Trauma-Informed Care in Perinatal Settings.

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Research in Nursing & Health Pub Date : 2026-08-01 Epub Date: 2026-04-11 DOI:10.1002/nur.70077
Ellen Goldstein, Yanqiao Li, Sara Johnson, Alana Biggers, Megha Shankar, Mary Dawn Koenig
{"title":"Clinicians' Experiences and Recommendations for Implementing Trauma-Informed Care in Perinatal Settings.","authors":"Ellen Goldstein, Yanqiao Li, Sara Johnson, Alana Biggers, Megha Shankar, Mary Dawn Koenig","doi":"10.1002/nur.70077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although trauma-informed care (TIC) is increasingly recognized as essential, its inclusion in perinatal care remains limited. Over 50% of reproductive-age individuals in the United States report experiencing childhood adversity, highlighting a critical need for TIC. The contextual factors shaping TIC implementation in perinatal settings remain underexplored. This study seeks to understand perinatal clinicians' experiences of the implementation determinants that influence TIC integration at system- and practice-levels. Between June 2024 and October 2024, we conducted in-depth, semi-structured interviews with perinatal clinicians practicing in an urban academic health system about their perspectives on incorporating TIC into perinatal services. Interviews were audio- and video-recorded and transcribed verbatim. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) was used as the theoretical framework for the analysis. Transcripts were analyzed inductively to identify emergent themes, and then deductively mapped to CFIR's 5 inner setting factors. Among 23 clinicians interviewed, there were certified nurse-midwives, obstetrician-gynecologists, advanced practice registered nurses, and a family physician. Most participants (95.7%) identified as women with an average of 11.8 years in practice (SD = 9.4). Participants shared that challenges to implementing TIC are largely systemic and rooted in system inflexibility, which is reflected by a lack of supportive structures, standardized processes, and dedicated resources. Perinatal clinicians' responses illuminated best practices in addition to insights and opportunities to improve clinical practice and organizational culture in providing TIC for pregnant individuals. Despite persistent challenges, leveraging identified facilitators, such as enhanced institutional support, and promoting interprofessional collaboration can inform strategies to more effectively embed TIC in perinatal care and improve outcomes for pregnant and postpartum individuals.</p>","PeriodicalId":54492,"journal":{"name":"Research in Nursing & Health","volume":" ","pages":"411-423"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13369829/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Nursing & Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.70077","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although trauma-informed care (TIC) is increasingly recognized as essential, its inclusion in perinatal care remains limited. Over 50% of reproductive-age individuals in the United States report experiencing childhood adversity, highlighting a critical need for TIC. The contextual factors shaping TIC implementation in perinatal settings remain underexplored. This study seeks to understand perinatal clinicians' experiences of the implementation determinants that influence TIC integration at system- and practice-levels. Between June 2024 and October 2024, we conducted in-depth, semi-structured interviews with perinatal clinicians practicing in an urban academic health system about their perspectives on incorporating TIC into perinatal services. Interviews were audio- and video-recorded and transcribed verbatim. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) was used as the theoretical framework for the analysis. Transcripts were analyzed inductively to identify emergent themes, and then deductively mapped to CFIR's 5 inner setting factors. Among 23 clinicians interviewed, there were certified nurse-midwives, obstetrician-gynecologists, advanced practice registered nurses, and a family physician. Most participants (95.7%) identified as women with an average of 11.8 years in practice (SD = 9.4). Participants shared that challenges to implementing TIC are largely systemic and rooted in system inflexibility, which is reflected by a lack of supportive structures, standardized processes, and dedicated resources. Perinatal clinicians' responses illuminated best practices in addition to insights and opportunities to improve clinical practice and organizational culture in providing TIC for pregnant individuals. Despite persistent challenges, leveraging identified facilitators, such as enhanced institutional support, and promoting interprofessional collaboration can inform strategies to more effectively embed TIC in perinatal care and improve outcomes for pregnant and postpartum individuals.

临床医生在围产期环境中实施创伤知情护理的经验和建议。
尽管创伤知情护理(TIC)越来越被认为是必不可少的,但其在围产期护理中的纳入仍然有限。在美国,超过50%的育龄个体报告童年经历过逆境,这突出了对TIC的迫切需求。在围产期环境中形成TIC实施的背景因素仍未得到充分探讨。本研究旨在了解围产期临床医生在系统和实践水平上影响TIC整合的实施决定因素的经验。在2024年6月至2024年10月期间,我们对在城市学术卫生系统执业的围产期临床医生进行了深入的半结构化访谈,了解他们对将TIC纳入围产期服务的看法。对采访进行了录音和录像,并逐字抄录。采用实施研究综合框架(CFIR)作为理论框架进行分析。对转录本进行归纳分析,识别突发性主题,然后演绎映射到CFIR的5个内部设定因素。受访的23名临床医生中,有注册护士、助产士、妇产科医生、高级执业注册护士和一名家庭医生。大多数参与者(95.7%)被确定为女性,平均从业时间为11.8年(SD = 9.4)。与会者都认为,实施议会选举的挑战主要是系统性的,根源在于制度缺乏灵活性,这反映在缺乏支持结构、标准化流程和专用资源上。围产期临床医生的反应说明了最佳做法,除了见解和机会,以改善临床实践和组织文化,为孕妇提供TIC。尽管存在持续的挑战,利用已确定的促进因素,如加强机构支持,促进跨专业合作,可以为更有效地将TIC纳入围产期护理的战略提供信息,并改善孕妇和产后个体的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
73
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Research in Nursing & Health ( RINAH ) is a peer-reviewed general research journal devoted to publication of a wide range of research that will inform the practice of nursing and other health disciplines. The editors invite reports of research describing problems and testing interventions related to health phenomena, health care and self-care, clinical organization and administration; and the testing of research findings in practice. Research protocols are considered if funded in a peer-reviewed process by an agency external to the authors’ home institution and if the work is in progress. Papers on research methods and techniques are appropriate if they go beyond what is already generally available in the literature and include description of successful use of the method. Theory papers are accepted if each proposition is supported by research evidence. Systematic reviews of the literature are reviewed if PRISMA guidelines are followed. Letters to the editor commenting on published articles are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书