One Size Fits Most: How Universal Family Engagement Practices Overlook Foster Families in Early Childhood Education.

IF 1.4
Ronald Ssentuuwa, Vickie E Lake
{"title":"One Size Fits Most: How Universal Family Engagement Practices Overlook Foster Families in Early Childhood Education.","authors":"Ronald Ssentuuwa, Vickie E Lake","doi":"10.1080/26408066.2026.2657380","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Family engagement is a key contributor to positive developmental outcomes in early childhood education (ECE), particularly in programs serving high-need populations such as Head Start and Early Head Start. While extensive research highlights its benefits for children, families, and educators, limited attention has been given to how ECE professionals engage foster families.</p><p><strong>Purpose of the study: </strong>This study examines educators' and family engagement specialists' perceptions on family engagement practices, with a focus on foster families.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Guided by a social constructivist framework, the study employed a qualitative design using semi-structured interviews with family engagement specialists, a focus group with center administrators, an online teacher survey, document analysis, and field notes. Data were analyzed through structural and thematic coding to identify patterns across stakeholder perspectives.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Findings indicate that engagement practices are largely universal, with similar routines applied to all families, including informal interactions during drop-off and pick-up, parent - teacher conferences, and center-based events. Although relationship-building, trust, and communication were emphasized as central, strategies specifically tailored to foster families were limited.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Engagement was primarily center based, with minimal attention to home-based approaches, despite their established link to stronger developmental outcomes. These findings suggest that a \"one-size-fits-all\" approach may not adequately address the unique circumstances of foster families, including placement instability and involvement in child welfare systems.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study underscores the need for targeted professional development and system-level support to promote more responsive and context-sensitive engagement, ultimately enhancing equity and improving outcomes for children in foster care.</p>","PeriodicalId":73742,"journal":{"name":"Journal of evidence-based social work (2019)","volume":" ","pages":"1-17"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of evidence-based social work (2019)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/26408066.2026.2657380","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Family engagement is a key contributor to positive developmental outcomes in early childhood education (ECE), particularly in programs serving high-need populations such as Head Start and Early Head Start. While extensive research highlights its benefits for children, families, and educators, limited attention has been given to how ECE professionals engage foster families.

Purpose of the study: This study examines educators' and family engagement specialists' perceptions on family engagement practices, with a focus on foster families.

Materials and methods: Guided by a social constructivist framework, the study employed a qualitative design using semi-structured interviews with family engagement specialists, a focus group with center administrators, an online teacher survey, document analysis, and field notes. Data were analyzed through structural and thematic coding to identify patterns across stakeholder perspectives.

Results: Findings indicate that engagement practices are largely universal, with similar routines applied to all families, including informal interactions during drop-off and pick-up, parent - teacher conferences, and center-based events. Although relationship-building, trust, and communication were emphasized as central, strategies specifically tailored to foster families were limited.

Discussion: Engagement was primarily center based, with minimal attention to home-based approaches, despite their established link to stronger developmental outcomes. These findings suggest that a "one-size-fits-all" approach may not adequately address the unique circumstances of foster families, including placement instability and involvement in child welfare systems.

Conclusion: The study underscores the need for targeted professional development and system-level support to promote more responsive and context-sensitive engagement, ultimately enhancing equity and improving outcomes for children in foster care.

一种方式最适合:普遍的家庭参与实践如何忽视了早期儿童教育中的寄养家庭。
简介:家庭参与是早期儿童教育(ECE)中积极发展成果的关键因素,特别是在为高需求人群服务的项目中,如Head Start和early Head Start。虽然广泛的研究强调了它对儿童、家庭和教育工作者的好处,但对欧洲经委会专业人员如何与寄养家庭接触的关注有限。研究目的:本研究考察了教育工作者和家庭参与专家对家庭参与实践的看法,重点是寄养家庭。材料和方法:在社会建构主义框架的指导下,本研究采用定性设计,采用与家庭参与专家的半结构化访谈、与中心管理人员的焦点小组、在线教师调查、文件分析和实地笔记。通过结构和主题编码对数据进行分析,以确定跨利益相关者视角的模式。结果:研究结果表明,参与实践在很大程度上是普遍的,类似的惯例适用于所有家庭,包括接送孩子时的非正式互动、家长教师会议和以中心为基础的活动。虽然建立关系、信任和沟通被强调为中心,但专门为寄养家庭量身定制的策略是有限的。讨论:参与主要是基于中心的,很少关注基于家庭的方法,尽管它们与更强的发展结果建立了联系。这些发现表明,“一刀切”的方法可能无法充分解决寄养家庭的独特情况,包括安置不稳定和参与儿童福利系统。结论:该研究强调了有针对性的专业发展和系统级支持的必要性,以促进更具响应性和环境敏感性的参与,最终增强寄养儿童的公平性和改善结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书