Review of Donanemab and Lecanemab in Mild Dementia Stage of Alzheimer's Disease: Progress and Challenges.

Q2 Medicine
Muhammad A Qudoos, David P Elliott
{"title":"Review of Donanemab and Lecanemab in Mild Dementia Stage of Alzheimer's Disease: Progress and Challenges.","authors":"Muhammad A Qudoos, David P Elliott","doi":"10.4140/TCP.n.2026.98","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder marked by cognitive decline and functional impairment, primarily driven by the accumulation of amyloid-beta (Aβ) plaques and tau tangles. Historically, treatments have focused on symptomatic relief; however, recent therapeutic advances have focused on disease-modifying monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), notably lecanemab and donanemab, which target Aβ pathology in early-stage AD. This review explores the clinical efficacy, safety profile, and limitations of lecanemab and donanemab, emphasizing key findings from the CLARITY-AD and TRAILBLAZER-ALZ 2 trials. In these studies, lecanemab was shown to slow cognitive decline by 27% over 18 months, while donanemab achieved a 28.9% reduction over 76 weeks, with the greatest benefits observed in patients presenting with lower baseline tau pathology.Despite these promising outcomes, challenges remain, including possible reduced efficacy in women based on subgroup analyses of trial data, racial disparities in trial representation, adverse effects such as amyloid-related imaging abnormalities (ARIA), and substantial cost and accessibility barriers. This review underscores the need for more inclusive research, personalized treatment strategies, and continued exploration of AD's complex pathology beyond amyloid clearance.</p>","PeriodicalId":41635,"journal":{"name":"Senior Care Pharmacist","volume":"41 3","pages":"98-108"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Senior Care Pharmacist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4140/TCP.n.2026.98","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder marked by cognitive decline and functional impairment, primarily driven by the accumulation of amyloid-beta (Aβ) plaques and tau tangles. Historically, treatments have focused on symptomatic relief; however, recent therapeutic advances have focused on disease-modifying monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), notably lecanemab and donanemab, which target Aβ pathology in early-stage AD. This review explores the clinical efficacy, safety profile, and limitations of lecanemab and donanemab, emphasizing key findings from the CLARITY-AD and TRAILBLAZER-ALZ 2 trials. In these studies, lecanemab was shown to slow cognitive decline by 27% over 18 months, while donanemab achieved a 28.9% reduction over 76 weeks, with the greatest benefits observed in patients presenting with lower baseline tau pathology.Despite these promising outcomes, challenges remain, including possible reduced efficacy in women based on subgroup analyses of trial data, racial disparities in trial representation, adverse effects such as amyloid-related imaging abnormalities (ARIA), and substantial cost and accessibility barriers. This review underscores the need for more inclusive research, personalized treatment strategies, and continued exploration of AD's complex pathology beyond amyloid clearance.

Donanemab和Lecanemab在阿尔茨海默病轻度痴呆期的研究进展和挑战
阿尔茨海默病(AD)是一种以认知能力下降和功能障碍为特征的进行性神经退行性疾病,主要由淀粉样蛋白(a β)斑块和tau缠结的积累驱动。从历史上看,治疗的重点是症状缓解;然而,最近的治疗进展主要集中在疾病修饰单克隆抗体(mab)上,特别是lecanemab和donanemab,它们针对早期AD的Aβ病理。这篇综述探讨了lecanemab和donanemab的临床疗效、安全性和局限性,强调了CLARITY-AD和TRAILBLAZER-ALZ 2试验的主要发现。在这些研究中,lecanemab在18个月内减缓了27%的认知能力下降,而donanemab在76周内实现了28.9%的下降,在基线tau病理较低的患者中观察到最大的益处。尽管有这些有希望的结果,挑战仍然存在,包括基于试验数据亚组分析的女性疗效可能降低,试验代表性的种族差异,淀粉样蛋白相关成像异常(ARIA)等不良反应,以及大量的成本和可及性障碍。这篇综述强调了需要更多的包容性研究,个性化的治疗策略,以及继续探索淀粉样蛋白清除之外的AD复杂病理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Senior Care Pharmacist
Senior Care Pharmacist PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
160
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书