Impact of TOPAZ-1 eligibility on the survival benefit of durvalumab plus gemcitabine-cisplatin in advanced biliary tract cancer: a multicenter real-world study.

IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Journal of Gastroenterology Pub Date : 2026-08-01 Epub Date: 2026-04-12 DOI:10.1007/s00535-026-02412-6
Hisashi Kosaka, Rie Sugimoto, Masahiko Kinoshita, Satoshi Yasuda, Satoru Kakizaki, Jun Sakata, Kiyonori Yamai, Takeshi Hatanaka, Yusuke Yamamoto, Toshifumi Sato, Toru Ishikawa, Takanori Morikawa, Jun Hanaoka, Haruki Mori, Hidenori Toyoda, Tsuyoshi Sanuki, Misaki Yokoi, Hiroyuki Shibata, Koji Fukuda, Kazuhito Kawata, Koji Amaya, Takashi Ito, Masaaki Hidaka, Atsushi Naganuma, Keishi Sugimachi, Masaki Kaibori
{"title":"Impact of TOPAZ-1 eligibility on the survival benefit of durvalumab plus gemcitabine-cisplatin in advanced biliary tract cancer: a multicenter real-world study.","authors":"Hisashi Kosaka, Rie Sugimoto, Masahiko Kinoshita, Satoshi Yasuda, Satoru Kakizaki, Jun Sakata, Kiyonori Yamai, Takeshi Hatanaka, Yusuke Yamamoto, Toshifumi Sato, Toru Ishikawa, Takanori Morikawa, Jun Hanaoka, Haruki Mori, Hidenori Toyoda, Tsuyoshi Sanuki, Misaki Yokoi, Hiroyuki Shibata, Koji Fukuda, Kazuhito Kawata, Koji Amaya, Takashi Ito, Masaaki Hidaka, Atsushi Naganuma, Keishi Sugimachi, Masaki Kaibori","doi":"10.1007/s00535-026-02412-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Durvalumab plus gemcitabine-cisplatin (GCD) has become a standard first-line therapy for advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC) following the TOPAZ-1 trial. However, whether the survival benefit observed in trial-eligible patients can be generalized to broader real-world populations remains uncertain. We evaluated the impact of TOPAZ-1 eligibility on the effectiveness of GCD in routine clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this multicenter retrospective cohort study, 610 patients with unresectable or recurrent BTC treated with first-line GCD (n = 268) or gemcitabine-cisplatin (GC) (n = 342) at 19 Japanese institutions were analyzed. Patients were classified according to TOPAZ-1 eligibility criteria. Overall survival (OS) was compared between treatment groups in the entire cohort and stratified by eligibility status. Multivariable Cox models were constructed separately for eligible and ineligible patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 610 patients, 324 (53.1%) met TOPAZ-1 eligibility criteria. In the overall cohort, GCD was associated with longer OS than GC (median, 13.7 vs 11.3 months; p = 0.009). Among eligible patients, GCD significantly improved OS compared with GC (18.0 vs 13.1 months; p = 0.004), whereas no significant difference was observed among ineligible patients (10.8 vs 10.0 months; p = 0.675). However, the interaction between treatment and TOPAZ-1 eligibility was not statistically significant (p for interaction = 0.162).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this real-world cohort, the survival benefit of GCD appeared to be primarily observed in patients meeting TOPAZ-1 eligibility criteria. Trial-based eligibility may influence the magnitude of benefit from immunochemotherapy in advanced BTC, underscoring the importance of patient selection in routine practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":16059,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gastroenterology","volume":" ","pages":"1170-1180"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13407461/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00535-026-02412-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Durvalumab plus gemcitabine-cisplatin (GCD) has become a standard first-line therapy for advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC) following the TOPAZ-1 trial. However, whether the survival benefit observed in trial-eligible patients can be generalized to broader real-world populations remains uncertain. We evaluated the impact of TOPAZ-1 eligibility on the effectiveness of GCD in routine clinical practice.

Methods: In this multicenter retrospective cohort study, 610 patients with unresectable or recurrent BTC treated with first-line GCD (n = 268) or gemcitabine-cisplatin (GC) (n = 342) at 19 Japanese institutions were analyzed. Patients were classified according to TOPAZ-1 eligibility criteria. Overall survival (OS) was compared between treatment groups in the entire cohort and stratified by eligibility status. Multivariable Cox models were constructed separately for eligible and ineligible patients.

Results: Among 610 patients, 324 (53.1%) met TOPAZ-1 eligibility criteria. In the overall cohort, GCD was associated with longer OS than GC (median, 13.7 vs 11.3 months; p = 0.009). Among eligible patients, GCD significantly improved OS compared with GC (18.0 vs 13.1 months; p = 0.004), whereas no significant difference was observed among ineligible patients (10.8 vs 10.0 months; p = 0.675). However, the interaction between treatment and TOPAZ-1 eligibility was not statistically significant (p for interaction = 0.162).

Conclusions: In this real-world cohort, the survival benefit of GCD appeared to be primarily observed in patients meeting TOPAZ-1 eligibility criteria. Trial-based eligibility may influence the magnitude of benefit from immunochemotherapy in advanced BTC, underscoring the importance of patient selection in routine practice.

TOPAZ-1适格性对durvalumab联合吉西他滨-顺铂治疗晚期胆道癌患者生存获益的影响:一项多中心现实世界研究
背景:在TOPAZ-1试验之后,Durvalumab联合吉西他滨-顺铂(GCD)已成为晚期胆道癌(BTC)的标准一线治疗方案。然而,在符合试验条件的患者中观察到的生存获益是否可以推广到更广泛的现实世界人群仍不确定。在常规临床实践中,我们评估了TOPAZ-1适格性对GCD有效性的影响。方法:在这项多中心回顾性队列研究中,日本19家机构的610例不可切除或复发性BTC患者接受一线GCD (n = 268)或吉西他滨-顺铂(n = 342)治疗。根据TOPAZ-1入选标准对患者进行分类。在整个队列中比较各治疗组之间的总生存期(OS),并按资格状况分层。对符合条件和不符合条件的患者分别构建多变量Cox模型。结果:610例患者中,324例(53.1%)符合TOPAZ-1标准。在整个队列中,GCD与更长的OS相关(中位数,13.7个月vs 11.3个月;p = 0.009)。在符合条件的患者中,与GC相比,GCD显著改善了OS (18.0 vs 13.1个月,p = 0.004),而在不符合条件的患者中没有观察到显著差异(10.8 vs 10.0个月,p = 0.675)。然而,治疗与TOPAZ-1适格性之间的交互作用无统计学意义(交互作用p = 0.162)。结论:在这个真实世界的队列中,GCD的生存获益似乎主要在符合TOPAZ-1资格标准的患者中观察到。基于试验的资格可能影响晚期BTC免疫化疗的获益程度,强调了常规实践中患者选择的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Gastroenterology
Journal of Gastroenterology 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
12.20
自引率
1.60%
发文量
99
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Gastroenterology, which is the official publication of the Japanese Society of Gastroenterology, publishes Original Articles (Alimentary Tract/Liver, Pancreas, and Biliary Tract), Review Articles, Letters to the Editors and other articles on all aspects of the field of gastroenterology. Significant contributions relating to basic research, theory, and practice are welcomed. These publications are designed to disseminate knowledge in this field to a worldwide audience, and accordingly, its editorial board has an international membership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书