Multiple Chronic Conditions, Delayed Medical Care and Hospitalization: A Comparison Between the United States and Taiwan.

IF 5.1 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Chen-Yang Wang, Ching-Ching Claire Lin, Raymond N Kuo, Joshua M Liao
{"title":"Multiple Chronic Conditions, Delayed Medical Care and Hospitalization: A Comparison Between the United States and Taiwan.","authors":"Chen-Yang Wang, Ching-Ching Claire Lin, Raymond N Kuo, Joshua M Liao","doi":"10.34172/ijhpm.9164","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Delays in medical care can be especially critical for individuals with multiple chronic conditions (MCCs). The United States and Taiwan, with vastly different healthcare systems, offer contrasting contexts for access to care. This study aims to examine the relationship between MCCs, delayed medical care and hospitalization in the US and Taiwan.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This analysis used data from the US National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) 2021 (n=29 482) and the Taiwan Social Change Survey (TSCS) 2021 health module (n=1604). We estimated multivariable logit regression models and calculated differential effects of MCCs status (no chronic conditions, one chronic condition, MCCs) on outcomes. Precision measures were estimated with delta method. All analyses for the US population incorporated applicable complex survey design and weighting, and for the Taiwan population incorporated weighting when appropriate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to those with no chronic conditions, individuals in the US with one chronic condition (2.0 percentage-points, <i>P</i><.001) or MCCs (3.6 percentage-points, <i>P</i><.001) had a higher likelihood of delayed care due to costs. In Taiwan, delayed care was less likely among individuals with one chronic condition (5.6 percentage-points, <i>P</i>=.08) or MCCs (9.5 percentage-points, <i>P</i>=.02), compared to individuals with no chronic conditions. Furthermore, individuals with MCCs or one chronic condition are associated with higher hospitalization in both the US (6.1 percentage-point, <i>P</i><.001; 1.6 percentage-point, <i>P</i>=.001, respectively) and Taiwan (15.7 percentage-point, <i>P</i><.001, 3.8 percentage-point, <i>P</i>=.08, respectively), although the differential effect of one chronic condition in Taiwan did not reach statistical significance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Analyzing data from two national health systems, this analysis shows differing relationships between MCC status and delayed care, suggesting a possible bidirectional effect. As both regions undergo reforms-US efforts to improve coordination and Taiwan's rising risk of fragmented care-these findings offer insights relevant to policy-makers and health system leaders beyond each country's context.</p>","PeriodicalId":14135,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Health Policy and Management","volume":"15 ","pages":"9164"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13034188/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Health Policy and Management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34172/ijhpm.9164","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Delays in medical care can be especially critical for individuals with multiple chronic conditions (MCCs). The United States and Taiwan, with vastly different healthcare systems, offer contrasting contexts for access to care. This study aims to examine the relationship between MCCs, delayed medical care and hospitalization in the US and Taiwan.

Methods: This analysis used data from the US National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) 2021 (n=29 482) and the Taiwan Social Change Survey (TSCS) 2021 health module (n=1604). We estimated multivariable logit regression models and calculated differential effects of MCCs status (no chronic conditions, one chronic condition, MCCs) on outcomes. Precision measures were estimated with delta method. All analyses for the US population incorporated applicable complex survey design and weighting, and for the Taiwan population incorporated weighting when appropriate.

Results: Compared to those with no chronic conditions, individuals in the US with one chronic condition (2.0 percentage-points, P<.001) or MCCs (3.6 percentage-points, P<.001) had a higher likelihood of delayed care due to costs. In Taiwan, delayed care was less likely among individuals with one chronic condition (5.6 percentage-points, P=.08) or MCCs (9.5 percentage-points, P=.02), compared to individuals with no chronic conditions. Furthermore, individuals with MCCs or one chronic condition are associated with higher hospitalization in both the US (6.1 percentage-point, P<.001; 1.6 percentage-point, P=.001, respectively) and Taiwan (15.7 percentage-point, P<.001, 3.8 percentage-point, P=.08, respectively), although the differential effect of one chronic condition in Taiwan did not reach statistical significance.

Conclusion: Analyzing data from two national health systems, this analysis shows differing relationships between MCC status and delayed care, suggesting a possible bidirectional effect. As both regions undergo reforms-US efforts to improve coordination and Taiwan's rising risk of fragmented care-these findings offer insights relevant to policy-makers and health system leaders beyond each country's context.

多重慢性病、延迟医疗与住院:美国与台湾之比较。
背景:对于患有多种慢性疾病(mcc)的个体来说,医疗护理的延误尤其重要。美国和台湾有着截然不同的医疗体系,在获得医疗服务方面形成了截然不同的背景。摘要本研究旨在探讨美国与台湾地区的mcc、延迟医疗与住院之间的关系。方法:本分析使用的数据来自美国国家健康访谈调查(NHIS) 2021 (n= 29482)和台湾社会变革调查(TSCS) 2021健康模块(n=1604)。我们估计了多变量logit回归模型,并计算了mcc状态(无慢性疾病、一种慢性疾病、mcc)对结果的差异影响。用delta法估计精度。所有针对美国人口的分析均采用了适用的复杂调查设计和加权,而针对台湾人口的分析则在适当时采用了加权。结果:与没有慢性疾病的人相比,美国有一种慢性疾病的人(2.0个百分点,PPP=.08)或mcs的人(9.5个百分点,P=.02)与没有慢性疾病的人相比。此外,在美国(6.1个百分点,PP=.001)和台湾(15.7个百分点,PP=.08),患有mcc或一种慢性疾病的个体与更高的住院率相关,尽管台湾一种慢性疾病的差异效应没有达到统计学意义。结论:通过分析来自两个国家卫生系统的数据,该分析显示MCC状态与延迟护理之间存在不同的关系,表明可能存在双向效应。由于这两个地区都在进行改革——美国努力改善协调,而台湾的医疗碎片化风险不断上升——这些发现为政策制定者和卫生系统领导者提供了超越各自国家背景的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Health Policy and Management
International Journal of Health Policy and Management Health Professions-Health Information Management
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
14.30%
发文量
142
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Health Policy and Management (IJHPM) is a monthly open access, peer-reviewed journal which serves as an international and interdisciplinary setting for the dissemination of health policy and management research. It brings together individual specialties from different fields, notably health management/policy/economics, epidemiology, social/public policy, and philosophy into a dynamic academic mix.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书