{"title":"Post-exercise Glucose Management in Type 1 Diabetes: Comparing Carbohydrate Intake and Insulin Reduction Strategies","authors":"Sémah Tagougui PhD, Elsa Heyman PhD, Nadine Taleb MD, PhD, Joséphine Molveau PhD, Virginie Messier MSc, Corinne Suppere MSc, Roxane St-Amand MSc, Laurent Legault MD, Rémi Rabasa-Lhoret MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.eprac.2026.03.106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study aimed to compare 2 post-exercise glucose management approaches in type 1 diabetes patients using continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A group of 46 adults and adolescents underwent a 60-minute ergocycling session at 60% of their VO<sub>2peak</sub> at 4 <span>pm</span> After the exercise, participants were randomly assigned to post-exercise glucose management strategies: The first strategy involved a 20% reduction in basal insulin infusion rate for 10 h, along with a 20% reduction in the dinner insulin bolus. The second strategy consisted of consuming a post-exercise snack with 50% of their usual insulin bolus, followed by an evening snack without insulin bolus.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>During the 13-hours of recovery (5 PM to 6 AM post-exercise), there were no significant differences between the 2 strategies in terms of time spent within blood glucose levels of 4.0-10.0 mmol/l (54.4 ± 26.2 vs 57.7 ± 25.9%) and time spent below 4.0 mmol/l (1.8 ± 5.9 vs 5.5 ± 9.2%), this difference did not reach statistical significance, likely due to high interindividual variability as reflected by the large standard deviations. However, the time to first hypoglycemic event (eg, time from exercise end to first interstitial glucose <4.0 mmol/L) was significantly longer with the basal insulin reduction strategy (140 vs 83 min, <em>P</em>= .04), indicating a clinically meaningful advantage in delaying post-exercise hypoglycemia.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Both strategies were comparably effective in maintaining similar blood glucose stability during the 13-hours recovery period post-exercise. However, the basal insulin reduction strategy significantly delayed the onset of the first hypoglycemic episode, suggesting a potential advantage for post-exercise hypoglycemia management.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11682,"journal":{"name":"Endocrine Practice","volume":"32 9","pages":"Pages 1347-1352"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endocrine Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1530891X26009365","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
This study aimed to compare 2 post-exercise glucose management approaches in type 1 diabetes patients using continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion.
Methods
A group of 46 adults and adolescents underwent a 60-minute ergocycling session at 60% of their VO2peak at 4 pm After the exercise, participants were randomly assigned to post-exercise glucose management strategies: The first strategy involved a 20% reduction in basal insulin infusion rate for 10 h, along with a 20% reduction in the dinner insulin bolus. The second strategy consisted of consuming a post-exercise snack with 50% of their usual insulin bolus, followed by an evening snack without insulin bolus.
Results
During the 13-hours of recovery (5 PM to 6 AM post-exercise), there were no significant differences between the 2 strategies in terms of time spent within blood glucose levels of 4.0-10.0 mmol/l (54.4 ± 26.2 vs 57.7 ± 25.9%) and time spent below 4.0 mmol/l (1.8 ± 5.9 vs 5.5 ± 9.2%), this difference did not reach statistical significance, likely due to high interindividual variability as reflected by the large standard deviations. However, the time to first hypoglycemic event (eg, time from exercise end to first interstitial glucose <4.0 mmol/L) was significantly longer with the basal insulin reduction strategy (140 vs 83 min, P= .04), indicating a clinically meaningful advantage in delaying post-exercise hypoglycemia.
Conclusions
Both strategies were comparably effective in maintaining similar blood glucose stability during the 13-hours recovery period post-exercise. However, the basal insulin reduction strategy significantly delayed the onset of the first hypoglycemic episode, suggesting a potential advantage for post-exercise hypoglycemia management.
目的:本研究旨在比较持续皮下胰岛素输注治疗1型糖尿病(T1D)患者的两种运动后血糖管理方法。方法:一组46名成年人和青少年在下午4点以60%的最大摄氧量进行了60分钟的有氧运动。运动后,参与者被随机分配到运动后血糖管理策略:第一种策略是在10小时内将基础胰岛素输注率降低20%,同时将晚餐胰岛素剂量降低20%。第二种策略是在运动后吃一份含有50%胰岛素量的零食,然后在晚上吃一份没有胰岛素量的零食。结果:在恢复的13小时内(运动后5点至6点),两种策略在血糖水平在4.0-10.0 mmol/l(54.4±26.2 vs. 57.7±25.9%)和低于4.0 mmol/l(1.8±5.9 vs. 5.5±9.2%)的时间上没有显著差异,这种差异没有达到统计学意义,这可能是由于个体间差异很大,反映了较大的标准偏差。然而,到第一次低血糖事件的时间(例如,从运动结束到第一次间质性血糖的时间)。结论:在运动后13小时的恢复期,这两种策略在维持相似的血糖稳定性方面都相当有效。然而,基础胰岛素降低策略显著延迟了首次低血糖发作的发生,这表明运动后低血糖管理的潜在优势。
期刊介绍:
Endocrine Practice (ISSN: 1530-891X), a peer-reviewed journal published twelve times a year, is the official journal of the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE). The primary mission of Endocrine Practice is to enhance the health care of patients with endocrine diseases through continuing education of practicing endocrinologists.