A rapid tool for understanding how knowledge users engage with research findings in research-for-development contexts.

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Steven Lam, Vivian Hoffmann, Lilian Otoigo, Hung Nguyen-Viet
{"title":"A rapid tool for understanding how knowledge users engage with research findings in research-for-development contexts.","authors":"Steven Lam, Vivian Hoffmann, Lilian Otoigo, Hung Nguyen-Viet","doi":"10.1186/s12961-026-01478-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Promoting the use of research findings in development projects is essential but often overlooked during study design. Existing frameworks for research use tend to focus on clinical settings and offer questionable applicability to development contexts, which are typically nonlinear, dynamic and cross-sectoral. As a result, there remains a gap in tools that can capture how evidence is intended to be applied by diverse knowledge users in real-world development settings. To address this gap, and drawing on over a decade of experience implementing research-to-action strategies, our objective is to develop a simple research uptake and use tool to better understand and support the use of evidence in research-for-development. We piloted the tool immediately after or 1 month following dissemination workshops, engaging 206 participants across nine sessions in five countries - Kenya, Ethiopia, Bangladesh, Malawi, and Vietnam - to gather insights on which evidence was most relevant, how participants intended to apply it and why they valued it. Although conceptualized with a focus on agriculture and global health research, this framework is broadly applicable across the wider development sector in low- and middle-income countries.</p>","PeriodicalId":12870,"journal":{"name":"Health Research Policy and Systems","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Research Policy and Systems","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-026-01478-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Promoting the use of research findings in development projects is essential but often overlooked during study design. Existing frameworks for research use tend to focus on clinical settings and offer questionable applicability to development contexts, which are typically nonlinear, dynamic and cross-sectoral. As a result, there remains a gap in tools that can capture how evidence is intended to be applied by diverse knowledge users in real-world development settings. To address this gap, and drawing on over a decade of experience implementing research-to-action strategies, our objective is to develop a simple research uptake and use tool to better understand and support the use of evidence in research-for-development. We piloted the tool immediately after or 1 month following dissemination workshops, engaging 206 participants across nine sessions in five countries - Kenya, Ethiopia, Bangladesh, Malawi, and Vietnam - to gather insights on which evidence was most relevant, how participants intended to apply it and why they valued it. Although conceptualized with a focus on agriculture and global health research, this framework is broadly applicable across the wider development sector in low- and middle-income countries.

一个快速的工具,用于了解知识使用者如何在研究促进发展的背景下参与研究成果。
促进在发展项目中使用研究成果是必不可少的,但在研究设计过程中往往被忽视。现有的研究使用框架往往侧重于临床环境,对发展环境的适用性存在问题,这些环境通常是非线性的、动态的和跨部门的。因此,在能够捕捉证据如何在现实世界的发展环境中被不同的知识使用者应用的工具方面仍然存在差距。为了弥补这一差距,并借鉴十多年来实施从研究到行动战略的经验,我们的目标是开发一种简单的研究吸收和使用工具,以便更好地理解和支持在研发中使用证据。我们在传播研讨会结束后或1个月后立即试用了该工具,在肯尼亚、埃塞俄比亚、孟加拉国、马拉维和越南等5个国家的9次会议上吸引了206名参与者,以收集关于哪些证据最相关、参与者打算如何应用这些证据以及他们为什么重视这些证据的见解。虽然这一框架的概念侧重于农业和全球卫生研究,但它广泛适用于低收入和中等收入国家更广泛的发展部门。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Research Policy and Systems
Health Research Policy and Systems HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
7.50%
发文量
124
审稿时长
27 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Research Policy and Systems is an Open Access, peer-reviewed, online journal that aims to provide a platform for the global research community to share their views, findings, insights and successes. Health Research Policy and Systems considers manuscripts that investigate the role of evidence-based health policy and health research systems in ensuring the efficient utilization and application of knowledge to improve health and health equity, especially in developing countries. Research is the foundation for improvements in public health. The problem is that people involved in different areas of research, together with managers and administrators in charge of research entities, do not communicate sufficiently with each other.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书