Understanding the formulation of non-communicable disease policies in Nepal: a qualitative study.

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Anju Vaidya, Padam Simkhada, Edwin van Teijlingen, Andrew Chee Keng Lee
{"title":"Understanding the formulation of non-communicable disease policies in Nepal: a qualitative study.","authors":"Anju Vaidya, Padam Simkhada, Edwin van Teijlingen, Andrew Chee Keng Lee","doi":"10.1093/heapol/czag048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Few policies have focused specifically on the growing burden of non-communicable diseases (NCDs) in low- and middle-income countries. Health policy formulation plays a vital role in the allocation of resources to implement effective interventions and reforms; hence, a nuanced understanding of the health policy formulation process is essential. However, there is limited evidence about the process through which NCD policies were formulated in Nepal. This study used Kingdon's multiple streams framework to explore how NCDs were recognized and prioritized, how policy alternatives were decided, how policy windows were opened, and which contextual factors influenced the policy formulation process. A qualitative case study approach was applied to gain a comprehensive understanding of the formulation of major NCD-related policies in Nepal. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 12 key stakeholders and policy documents were analyzed using framework analysis. The NCDs were gradually recognized and prioritized through the convergence of global and local evidence, sustained advocacy, and international commitments. Policymakers encountered several challenges, such as competing health priorities, the chronic nature of NCDs, donor preferences for communicable diseases, financial constraints, and multisectoral complexities of NCDs. The Package of Essential Non-communicable diseases interventions were adopted as a policy alternative, informed by global evidence, World Health Organization recommendations, and lessons from other countries. While coordinated efforts by stakeholders brought the problem, policy, and politics streams together, the role of policy entrepreneurs was found to be less relevant in Nepal's context. The findings highlight the need to consider external influences while conducting similar studies in low- and middle-income countries. Further research is needed on strategies to address persistent structural and financial challenges in NCD policy formulation.</p>","PeriodicalId":12926,"journal":{"name":"Health policy and planning","volume":" ","pages":"955-966"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13276260/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health policy and planning","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czag048","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Few policies have focused specifically on the growing burden of non-communicable diseases (NCDs) in low- and middle-income countries. Health policy formulation plays a vital role in the allocation of resources to implement effective interventions and reforms; hence, a nuanced understanding of the health policy formulation process is essential. However, there is limited evidence about the process through which NCD policies were formulated in Nepal. This study used Kingdon's multiple streams framework to explore how NCDs were recognized and prioritized, how policy alternatives were decided, how policy windows were opened, and which contextual factors influenced the policy formulation process. A qualitative case study approach was applied to gain a comprehensive understanding of the formulation of major NCD-related policies in Nepal. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 12 key stakeholders and policy documents were analyzed using framework analysis. The NCDs were gradually recognized and prioritized through the convergence of global and local evidence, sustained advocacy, and international commitments. Policymakers encountered several challenges, such as competing health priorities, the chronic nature of NCDs, donor preferences for communicable diseases, financial constraints, and multisectoral complexities of NCDs. The Package of Essential Non-communicable diseases interventions were adopted as a policy alternative, informed by global evidence, World Health Organization recommendations, and lessons from other countries. While coordinated efforts by stakeholders brought the problem, policy, and politics streams together, the role of policy entrepreneurs was found to be less relevant in Nepal's context. The findings highlight the need to consider external influences while conducting similar studies in low- and middle-income countries. Further research is needed on strategies to address persistent structural and financial challenges in NCD policy formulation.

了解尼泊尔非传染性疾病政策的制定:一项定性研究。
很少有政策专门关注中低收入国家日益加重的非传染性疾病负担。卫生政策的制定在分配资源以实施有效的干预措施和改革方面起着至关重要的作用;因此,对卫生政策制定过程有细致入微的了解至关重要。然而,关于尼泊尔制定非传染性疾病政策的过程的证据有限。本研究使用Kingdon的多流框架来探讨非传染性疾病如何被识别和优先考虑,如何确定政策选择,如何打开政策窗口,以及哪些背景因素影响政策制定过程。采用定性案例研究方法,全面了解尼泊尔与非传染性疾病有关的主要政策的制定情况。对12个关键利益相关者进行了半结构化访谈,并使用框架分析对政策文件进行了分析。通过全球和地方证据的融合、持续的宣传和国际承诺,非传染性疾病逐渐得到承认并成为优先事项。政策制定者遇到了若干挑战,例如相互竞争的卫生优先事项、非传染性疾病的慢性性质、捐助者对传染病的偏好、财政限制以及非传染性疾病的多部门复杂性。根据全球证据、世界卫生组织(世卫组织)的建议和其他国家的经验教训,通过了一揽子基本非传染性疾病干预措施,作为一项政策选择。虽然利益攸关方的协调努力将问题、政策和政治融合在一起,但政策企业家的作用与尼泊尔的情况不太相关。研究结果强调,在中低收入国家开展类似研究时,需要考虑外部影响。需要进一步研究应对非传染性疾病政策制定中持续存在的结构性和财政挑战的战略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health policy and planning
Health policy and planning 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
3.10%
发文量
98
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Health Policy and Planning publishes health policy and systems research focusing on low- and middle-income countries. Our journal provides an international forum for publishing original and high-quality research that addresses questions pertinent to policy-makers, public health researchers and practitioners. Health Policy and Planning is published 10 times a year.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书