Using pension payments abroad to examine post-retirement migration and health among Finnish migrants in Sweden

IF 2.8 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Journal of Migration and Health Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2026-03-31 DOI:10.1016/j.jmh.2026.100411
Agneta Cederström , Kaarina Korhonen , Pekka Martikainen , Olof M Östergren
{"title":"Using pension payments abroad to examine post-retirement migration and health among Finnish migrants in Sweden","authors":"Agneta Cederström ,&nbsp;Kaarina Korhonen ,&nbsp;Pekka Martikainen ,&nbsp;Olof M Östergren","doi":"10.1016/j.jmh.2026.100411","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This prospective cohort study used linked Swedish administrative registers and pension payment data to examine post-retirement migration patterns and health selection among Finnish migrants compared to native-born Swedes. The cohort included individuals born between 1938 and 1955 who were resident in Sweden at age 64, with follow-up from age 65 until death or the end of 2021 (<em>n</em> = 1794,196; 80,313 Finnish-born). Health status was assessed using the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), while pension payments were used to identify country of residence and mortality occurring after emigration. Post-retirement emigration was substantially more common among Finnish migrants (3.0 %) than native-born Swedes (0.3 %), primarily due to return migration to Finland. Contrary to the “salmon bias” hypothesis, poorer health reduced rather than increased the likelihood of emigration for both groups. Among Finnish migrants, lower CCI scores, male sex, being unmarried, and lower income predicted a higher likelihood of post-retirement migration. Sequence analyses revealed three distinct Finnish migration trajectories: early return, late return, and return with onward migration. Mortality did not differ significantly between Finnish migrants who remained in Sweden and those who resided in Finland or other countries; adjusted models even indicated slightly lower mortality among return migrants Extending follow-up abroad with pension data did not change mortality estimates, indicating unrecorded deaths abroad likely did not bias results. The findings indicate positive health selection into return migration and no evidence of a salmon bias effect. Post-retirement migration among Finnish migrants in Sweden is rare and has little impact on migrant–native mortality differences.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34448,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Migration and Health","volume":"13 ","pages":"Article 100411"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Migration and Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666623526000188","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This prospective cohort study used linked Swedish administrative registers and pension payment data to examine post-retirement migration patterns and health selection among Finnish migrants compared to native-born Swedes. The cohort included individuals born between 1938 and 1955 who were resident in Sweden at age 64, with follow-up from age 65 until death or the end of 2021 (n = 1794,196; 80,313 Finnish-born). Health status was assessed using the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), while pension payments were used to identify country of residence and mortality occurring after emigration. Post-retirement emigration was substantially more common among Finnish migrants (3.0 %) than native-born Swedes (0.3 %), primarily due to return migration to Finland. Contrary to the “salmon bias” hypothesis, poorer health reduced rather than increased the likelihood of emigration for both groups. Among Finnish migrants, lower CCI scores, male sex, being unmarried, and lower income predicted a higher likelihood of post-retirement migration. Sequence analyses revealed three distinct Finnish migration trajectories: early return, late return, and return with onward migration. Mortality did not differ significantly between Finnish migrants who remained in Sweden and those who resided in Finland or other countries; adjusted models even indicated slightly lower mortality among return migrants Extending follow-up abroad with pension data did not change mortality estimates, indicating unrecorded deaths abroad likely did not bias results. The findings indicate positive health selection into return migration and no evidence of a salmon bias effect. Post-retirement migration among Finnish migrants in Sweden is rare and has little impact on migrant–native mortality differences.
利用国外养老金支付调查在瑞典的芬兰移民的退休后移民和健康状况
这项前瞻性队列研究使用瑞典相关行政登记和养老金支付数据来研究芬兰移民与本地出生的瑞典人的退休后移民模式和健康选择。该队列包括1938年至1955年出生的人,他们在64岁时居住在瑞典,从65岁开始随访,直到死亡或2021年底(n = 1794,196; 80,313名芬兰出生的人)。使用Charlson共病指数(CCI)评估健康状况,而养恤金支付额用于确定居住国和移民后发生的死亡率。退休后移民在芬兰移民中(3.0%)比本土出生的瑞典人(0.3%)更为普遍,主要是由于返回芬兰的移民。与“鲑鱼偏见”假说相反,较差的健康状况降低了而不是增加了两组人移民的可能性。在芬兰移民中,较低的CCI分数、男性、未婚和较低的收入预示着较高的退休后移民可能性。序列分析揭示了三种不同的芬兰人迁移轨迹:早期返回、晚期返回和随迁移而返回。留在瑞典的芬兰移民与居住在芬兰或其他国家的芬兰移民之间的死亡率没有显著差异;调整后的模型甚至表明,回返移民的死亡率略低。利用养老金数据在国外进行后续调查并没有改变死亡率估计数,这表明国外未记录的死亡人数可能不会使结果产生偏差。研究结果表明,在洄游中存在积极的健康选择,没有证据表明存在鲑鱼偏倚效应。在瑞典的芬兰移民中,退休后移民是罕见的,对移民与本地人的死亡率差异影响不大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Migration and Health
Journal of Migration and Health Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
8.70%
发文量
65
审稿时长
153 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书