Milit S Patel, Edward Christopher Dee, Samarra Toby, Mena Ramos, Leo Anthony Celi
{"title":"The physician as a catalyst: Reimagining medical education for an AI era.","authors":"Milit S Patel, Edward Christopher Dee, Samarra Toby, Mena Ramos, Leo Anthony Celi","doi":"10.1080/0142159X.2026.2653205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Current medical education is caught in a paradox: it aims to train compassionate patient advocates yet its structure often fosters compliance and burnout, ill-equipping physicians to challenge the systemic drivers of poor health. The rapid integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into clinical practice is automating the cognitive-diagnostic tasks that have long defined physician training, from pattern recognition to data synthesis. This shift presents a specific, time-limited opportunity: rather than simply adopting AI as an efficiency tool within the existing transactional model, medical education can use this moment to fundamentally reimagine the physician's role and the training that shapes it. This requires moving beyond traditional competency-based models to embrace a pedagogy of advocacy, grounded in critical consciousness and systems-level thinking. By transforming curricula to address structural determinants of health, reassessing how we evaluate competence, and creating protected space for advocacy, we can train a new generation of physicians prepared not only to treat disease but to partner in transforming the systems that perpetuate it, through a phased approach aligned with AI maturity in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":18643,"journal":{"name":"Medical Teacher","volume":" ","pages":"1606-1612"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Teacher","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2026.2653205","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Current medical education is caught in a paradox: it aims to train compassionate patient advocates yet its structure often fosters compliance and burnout, ill-equipping physicians to challenge the systemic drivers of poor health. The rapid integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into clinical practice is automating the cognitive-diagnostic tasks that have long defined physician training, from pattern recognition to data synthesis. This shift presents a specific, time-limited opportunity: rather than simply adopting AI as an efficiency tool within the existing transactional model, medical education can use this moment to fundamentally reimagine the physician's role and the training that shapes it. This requires moving beyond traditional competency-based models to embrace a pedagogy of advocacy, grounded in critical consciousness and systems-level thinking. By transforming curricula to address structural determinants of health, reassessing how we evaluate competence, and creating protected space for advocacy, we can train a new generation of physicians prepared not only to treat disease but to partner in transforming the systems that perpetuate it, through a phased approach aligned with AI maturity in clinical practice.
期刊介绍:
Medical Teacher provides accounts of new teaching methods, guidance on structuring courses and assessing achievement, and serves as a forum for communication between medical teachers and those involved in general education. In particular, the journal recognizes the problems teachers have in keeping up-to-date with the developments in educational methods that lead to more effective teaching and learning at a time when the content of the curriculum—from medical procedures to policy changes in health care provision—is also changing. The journal features reports of innovation and research in medical education, case studies, survey articles, practical guidelines, reviews of current literature and book reviews. All articles are peer reviewed.