'Going back home', going to the 'ghetto': Sociability between men who have sex with men at the most critical point of COVID-19 in Brazil.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Global Public Health Pub Date : 2026-12-31 Epub Date: 2026-04-10 DOI:10.1080/17441692.2026.2657640
Luís Felipe Rios, Cinthia Oliveira, Mariana Andrade Gomes, Júlio Henrique Magalhães Luckwu, Severino Inácio da Silva Neto, Johnncley Barbosa Silva Filho, Larissa Vitoria Silva Soares, João Pedro Souza Dias, Rayssa Karollyne da Silva, Ingird Maciel
{"title":"'Going back home', going to the 'ghetto': Sociability between men who have sex with men at the most critical point of COVID-19 in Brazil.","authors":"Luís Felipe Rios, Cinthia Oliveira, Mariana Andrade Gomes, Júlio Henrique Magalhães Luckwu, Severino Inácio da Silva Neto, Johnncley Barbosa Silva Filho, Larissa Vitoria Silva Soares, João Pedro Souza Dias, Rayssa Karollyne da Silva, Ingird Maciel","doi":"10.1080/17441692.2026.2657640","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This text discusses the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the sociability of men who have sex with men (MSM) in northeastern Brazil, between 2020 and 2021. We analyze ethnographic data focused on the narratives of leisure professionals and workers in government and non-governmental organizations. In March 2020, social distancing measures were announced, including the closure of leisure establishments, which had a financial impact on owners and workers. Many returned to work illegally before it was allowed. MSM, affected by family homophobia and loneliness, resumed social activities, disobeying health regulations. Intersectionality between sex-gender, sexuality, race and class, together with federal denial of the virus's lethality, and weak economic mitigation policies, produced an environment conducive to death. Based on the experiences of the gay community in the Recife Metropolitan Region and other contexts, we propose an agenda for reflection and action for future health crises that affect sexually dissident populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":12735,"journal":{"name":"Global Public Health","volume":"21 1","pages":"2657640"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17441692.2026.2657640","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This text discusses the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the sociability of men who have sex with men (MSM) in northeastern Brazil, between 2020 and 2021. We analyze ethnographic data focused on the narratives of leisure professionals and workers in government and non-governmental organizations. In March 2020, social distancing measures were announced, including the closure of leisure establishments, which had a financial impact on owners and workers. Many returned to work illegally before it was allowed. MSM, affected by family homophobia and loneliness, resumed social activities, disobeying health regulations. Intersectionality between sex-gender, sexuality, race and class, together with federal denial of the virus's lethality, and weak economic mitigation policies, produced an environment conducive to death. Based on the experiences of the gay community in the Recife Metropolitan Region and other contexts, we propose an agenda for reflection and action for future health crises that affect sexually dissident populations.

“回家”,去“贫民窟”:在巴西新冠肺炎疫情最关键的时刻,男男性行为者之间的社交活动。
本文讨论了2020年至2021年期间2019冠状病毒病大流行对巴西东北部男男性行为者(MSM)社交能力的影响。我们分析民族志数据集中在休闲专业人士和工人在政府和非政府组织的叙述。2020年3月,宣布了保持社会距离的措施,包括关闭休闲场所,这对业主和工人产生了财务影响。许多人在被允许之前非法返回工作岗位。受家庭同性恋恐惧症和孤独感的影响,男同性恋者不遵守卫生条例,恢复了社会活动。性别、性别、种族和阶级之间的相互交织,加上联邦政府否认病毒的致命性,以及薄弱的经济缓解政策,形成了有利于死亡的环境。根据累西腓大都会区同性恋社区的经验和其他情况,我们提出了一项议程,以便对影响性异见人群的未来健康危机进行反思和采取行动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Global Public Health
Global Public Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
3.00%
发文量
120
期刊介绍: Global Public Health is an essential peer-reviewed journal that energetically engages with key public health issues that have come to the fore in the global environment — mounting inequalities between rich and poor; the globalization of trade; new patterns of travel and migration; epidemics of newly-emerging and re-emerging infectious diseases; the HIV/AIDS pandemic; the increase in chronic illnesses; escalating pressure on public health infrastructures around the world; and the growing range and scale of conflict situations, terrorist threats, environmental pressures, natural and human-made disasters.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书