From Transition to Reproduction: A Narrative Review of Evolving Evidence in Transgender Obstetrics and Gynecology.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2026-04-10 DOI:10.1159/000551771
Pietro Serra, Giuseppe Mascellino, Maria Teresa Bruno, Simone Garzon, Maria Francesca Guarneri, Giorgio Maria Baldini, Marco La Verde, Baydaa Alsannan, George Mpourazanis, Antonio Simone Laganà
{"title":"From Transition to Reproduction: A Narrative Review of Evolving Evidence in Transgender Obstetrics and Gynecology.","authors":"Pietro Serra, Giuseppe Mascellino, Maria Teresa Bruno, Simone Garzon, Maria Francesca Guarneri, Giorgio Maria Baldini, Marco La Verde, Baydaa Alsannan, George Mpourazanis, Antonio Simone Laganà","doi":"10.1159/000551771","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Transgender and gender-diverse (TGD) people assigned female at birth (AFAB) increasingly seek reproductive and gynecologic care, yet evidence and clinical pathways remain variable across health systems, including in Europe.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objective of this study was to synthesize evidence on fertility, pregnancy, gynecologic care, and access to care in TGD populations and to highlight practical implications for gender-affirming clinical practice, with attention to European settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A narrative review supported by a structured PubMed/MEDLINE search (January 1, 2014-May 31, 2025). Two reviewers screened 146 titles/abstracts; 58 full texts were assessed; and 31 publications were included. Nine primary studies reported quantitative pregnancy and/or assisted reproduction outcomes after prior testosterone exposure in AFAB TGD individuals.</p><p><strong>Outcome: </strong>Available data, largely small retrospective cohorts and case series, suggest that pregnancy and assisted reproduction are feasible after prior testosterone exposure, typically after temporary cessation. In studies with cisgender comparators, oocyte yield and embryology metrics appeared broadly comparable, but evidence remains heterogeneous and underpowered for robust safety conclusions. Survey-based studies indicate that more than half of pregnancies may be unintended. Barriers to fertility preservation (FP) and preventive gynecologic care include financial and structural constraints, limited provider training, and avoidance of pelvic examinations and cervical cancer screening.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and outlook: </strong>Reproductive counseling, FP, contraception, and organ-based screening should be integrated into gender-affirming pathways using trauma-informed, patient-centered communication. Prospective multicenter studies and standardized outcome reporting are needed to better define safety, effectiveness, and equity of care.</p>","PeriodicalId":12952,"journal":{"name":"Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation","volume":" ","pages":"485-494"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000551771","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Transgender and gender-diverse (TGD) people assigned female at birth (AFAB) increasingly seek reproductive and gynecologic care, yet evidence and clinical pathways remain variable across health systems, including in Europe.

Objectives: The objective of this study was to synthesize evidence on fertility, pregnancy, gynecologic care, and access to care in TGD populations and to highlight practical implications for gender-affirming clinical practice, with attention to European settings.

Methods: A narrative review supported by a structured PubMed/MEDLINE search (January 1, 2014-May 31, 2025). Two reviewers screened 146 titles/abstracts; 58 full texts were assessed; and 31 publications were included. Nine primary studies reported quantitative pregnancy and/or assisted reproduction outcomes after prior testosterone exposure in AFAB TGD individuals.

Outcome: Available data, largely small retrospective cohorts and case series, suggest that pregnancy and assisted reproduction are feasible after prior testosterone exposure, typically after temporary cessation. In studies with cisgender comparators, oocyte yield and embryology metrics appeared broadly comparable, but evidence remains heterogeneous and underpowered for robust safety conclusions. Survey-based studies indicate that more than half of pregnancies may be unintended. Barriers to fertility preservation (FP) and preventive gynecologic care include financial and structural constraints, limited provider training, and avoidance of pelvic examinations and cervical cancer screening.

Conclusions and outlook: Reproductive counseling, FP, contraception, and organ-based screening should be integrated into gender-affirming pathways using trauma-informed, patient-centered communication. Prospective multicenter studies and standardized outcome reporting are needed to better define safety, effectiveness, and equity of care.

从过渡到生殖:跨性别妇产科证据演变的叙述性回顾。
背景:越来越多的变性人和性别多样性(TGD)出生时被指定为女性(AFAB)的人寻求生殖和妇科护理,但证据和临床途径在包括欧洲在内的卫生系统中仍然存在差异。目的:综合TGD人群的生育、怀孕、妇科护理和获得护理的证据,并强调性别肯定临床实践的实际意义,并关注欧洲环境。方法:采用结构化PubMed/MEDLINE检索(2014年1月1日- 2025年5月31日)支持的叙述性综述。两位审稿人筛选了146篇题目/摘要;评估了58个全文;共收录31份出版物。9项初步研究报告了AFAB - TGD患者先前暴露于睾酮后的定量妊娠和/或辅助生殖结果。结果:现有的数据,主要是小型回顾性队列和病例系列,表明在先前的睾酮暴露后,通常在暂时停止后,怀孕和辅助生殖是可行的。在使用顺性别比较物的研究中,卵母细胞产量和胚胎学指标似乎具有广泛的可比性,但证据仍然不一致,不足以得出可靠的安全性结论。基于调查的研究表明,超过一半的怀孕可能是意外的。保留生育能力和预防性妇科护理的障碍包括经济和结构限制,有限的提供者培训,以及避免盆腔检查和宫颈癌筛查。结论和展望:生殖咨询、生育保护、避孕和基于器官的筛查应通过创伤知情、以患者为中心的沟通纳入性别确认途径。需要前瞻性多中心研究和标准化的结果报告来更好地定义治疗的安全性、有效性和公平性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
4.80%
发文量
44
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: This journal covers the most active and promising areas of current research in gynecology and obstetrics. Invited, well-referenced reviews by noted experts keep readers in touch with the general framework and direction of international study. Original papers report selected experimental and clinical investigations in all fields related to gynecology, obstetrics and reproduction. Short communications are published to allow immediate discussion of new data. The international and interdisciplinary character of this periodical provides an avenue to less accessible sources and to worldwide research for investigators and practitioners.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书