Examining Factors Involved in Suicide Deaths in the National Violent Death Reporting System.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Archives of Suicide Research Pub Date : 2026-10-01 Epub Date: 2026-04-10 DOI:10.1080/13811118.2026.2653017
Shannon M Cain, Samantha C Cacace, Robert J Cramer
{"title":"Examining Factors Involved in Suicide Deaths in the National Violent Death Reporting System.","authors":"Shannon M Cain, Samantha C Cacace, Robert J Cramer","doi":"10.1080/13811118.2026.2653017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Suicide claims thousands of Americans' lives every year. A leading theory explaining suicide is the Interpersonal Theory of Suicide (ITS), yet little is known about how well this theory applies to suicide deaths. We assessed how well the ITS fit suicide deaths, followed by exploratory theoretical examination, in a national dataset using psychosocial variables.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The sample (N = 289,329) comprised individuals who died by suicide or by undetermined intent in the National Violent Death Reporting System (NVDRS). Factor analyses were conducted to examine how well ITS-supported indicators fit the data, and to identify novel theoretical patterns, for the group who died by suicide. Measurement invariance compared the resulting model across groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The ITS was a poor fit to the data. Exploratory analyses suggested a 2-factor model (i.e., justice-involvement and substance misuse) best fit the data. Model fit was found to vary at the configural level, indicating the 2-factor model was not the same for those who died by suicide and for those who died by deaths of undetermined intent.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Results identified a unique subset of suicide decedents characterized by justice involvement and substance use. Further work should explore the validity and clinical utility of the combination of justice involvement and substance misuse for suicide for those involved with the legal system.</p>","PeriodicalId":8325,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Suicide Research","volume":" ","pages":"1351-1368"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Suicide Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13811118.2026.2653017","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Suicide claims thousands of Americans' lives every year. A leading theory explaining suicide is the Interpersonal Theory of Suicide (ITS), yet little is known about how well this theory applies to suicide deaths. We assessed how well the ITS fit suicide deaths, followed by exploratory theoretical examination, in a national dataset using psychosocial variables.

Method: The sample (N = 289,329) comprised individuals who died by suicide or by undetermined intent in the National Violent Death Reporting System (NVDRS). Factor analyses were conducted to examine how well ITS-supported indicators fit the data, and to identify novel theoretical patterns, for the group who died by suicide. Measurement invariance compared the resulting model across groups.

Results: The ITS was a poor fit to the data. Exploratory analyses suggested a 2-factor model (i.e., justice-involvement and substance misuse) best fit the data. Model fit was found to vary at the configural level, indicating the 2-factor model was not the same for those who died by suicide and for those who died by deaths of undetermined intent.

Conclusions: Results identified a unique subset of suicide decedents characterized by justice involvement and substance use. Further work should explore the validity and clinical utility of the combination of justice involvement and substance misuse for suicide for those involved with the legal system.

国家暴力死亡报告系统中涉及自杀死亡的因素。
目的:每年有成千上万的美国人死于自杀。解释自杀的一个主要理论是人际自杀理论(ITS),但人们对这一理论在自杀死亡中的应用知之甚少。我们在使用社会心理变量的国家数据集中评估了ITS对自杀死亡的适应程度,随后进行了探索性理论检验。方法:样本(N = 289,329)包括在国家暴力死亡报告系统(NVDRS)中因自杀或不明原因死亡的个人。研究人员进行了因素分析,以检验its支持的指标与数据的匹配程度,并为自杀死亡的人群确定新的理论模式。测量不变性比较了各组之间的结果模型。结果:ITS与数据拟合较差。探索性分析表明,双因素模型(即司法介入和药物滥用)最适合数据。模型拟合在结构水平上有所不同,表明两因素模型对于自杀死亡和死因不明的死亡并不相同。结论:结果确定了以司法介入和物质使用为特征的自杀死者的独特子集。进一步的工作应该探索司法介入和药物滥用相结合的有效性和临床效用,为那些涉及法律制度的自杀。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
7.10%
发文量
69
期刊介绍: Archives of Suicide Research, the official journal of the International Academy of Suicide Research (IASR), is the international journal in the field of suicidology. The journal features original, refereed contributions on the study of suicide, suicidal behavior, its causes and effects, and techniques for prevention. The journal incorporates research-based and theoretical articles contributed by a diverse range of authors interested in investigating the biological, pharmacological, psychiatric, psychological, and sociological aspects of suicide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书