Wesley Brewer, Patrick Widener, Valentine Anantharaj, Feiyi Wang, Tom Beck, Arjun Shankar, Sarp Oral
{"title":"Data readiness pipeline patterns for scientific AI at scale: Insights from climate, fusion, life sciences, and materials","authors":"Wesley Brewer, Patrick Widener, Valentine Anantharaj, Feiyi Wang, Tom Beck, Arjun Shankar, Sarp Oral","doi":"10.1002/aaai.70056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article examines how data readiness for AI principles apply to large scientific datasets used to train foundation models. We analyze archetypal workflows across four representative domains—climate, nuclear fusion, life sciences, and materials—to identify common preprocessing patterns and domain-specific constraints. We introduce a two-dimensional readiness model that combines canonical preprocessing patterns with a five-level operational readiness scale, both tailored to high-performance computing (HPC) environments. This construct helps outline key challenges in transforming large-scale scientific data into formats suitable for scalable AI training. Together, these dimensions form a conceptual maturity matrix that characterizes scientific data readiness and guides infrastructure development toward standardized, cross-domain support for scalable and reproducible AI for science. Finally, we evaluate this maturity matrix in the context of case studies including ClimaX (climate), AFLOW (materials), OpenFold (proteomics), and DIII-D fusion disruption-prediction workflows, from which we distill lessons learned and provide recommendations to guide practitioners in developing robust AI-readiness pipelines. Finally, we discuss remaining cross-cutting challenges that persist across scientific domains.</p>","PeriodicalId":7854,"journal":{"name":"Ai Magazine","volume":"47 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/aaai.70056","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ai Magazine","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aaai.70056","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This article examines how data readiness for AI principles apply to large scientific datasets used to train foundation models. We analyze archetypal workflows across four representative domains—climate, nuclear fusion, life sciences, and materials—to identify common preprocessing patterns and domain-specific constraints. We introduce a two-dimensional readiness model that combines canonical preprocessing patterns with a five-level operational readiness scale, both tailored to high-performance computing (HPC) environments. This construct helps outline key challenges in transforming large-scale scientific data into formats suitable for scalable AI training. Together, these dimensions form a conceptual maturity matrix that characterizes scientific data readiness and guides infrastructure development toward standardized, cross-domain support for scalable and reproducible AI for science. Finally, we evaluate this maturity matrix in the context of case studies including ClimaX (climate), AFLOW (materials), OpenFold (proteomics), and DIII-D fusion disruption-prediction workflows, from which we distill lessons learned and provide recommendations to guide practitioners in developing robust AI-readiness pipelines. Finally, we discuss remaining cross-cutting challenges that persist across scientific domains.
期刊介绍:
AI Magazine publishes original articles that are reasonably self-contained and aimed at a broad spectrum of the AI community. Technical content should be kept to a minimum. In general, the magazine does not publish articles that have been published elsewhere in whole or in part. The magazine welcomes the contribution of articles on the theory and practice of AI as well as general survey articles, tutorial articles on timely topics, conference or symposia or workshop reports, and timely columns on topics of interest to AI scientists.