Educational attainment and its impact on prevalence of sterilization among Indian women

Women and Children Nursing Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2026-03-13 DOI:10.1016/j.wcn.2026.02.001
Arpita Basak , Sangeeta Kothagattu , Vivek Verma
{"title":"Educational attainment and its impact on prevalence of sterilization among Indian women","authors":"Arpita Basak ,&nbsp;Sangeeta Kothagattu ,&nbsp;Vivek Verma","doi":"10.1016/j.wcn.2026.02.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Population policies are concerned with maternal and child health, and contraceptive methods have became a priority in recent centuries, especially in underdeveloped and developing countries. Female sterilization is the predominant method of contraception, and it is assumed that every woman is aware of it as a permanent contraception method irrespective of their educational level. This study aimed to assess the impact of educational attainment on distribution of sterilization trends among women with different levels of education.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>Data were obtained from the fifth round of the National Family Health Survey-5 (2019–2021), of which 507,316 women were eligible for this study. We considered demographic and socioeconomic factors to model the association between sterilization preferences and the role of educational attainment in shaping their understanding and decisions.</div></div><div><h3>Result</h3><div>Women with education below the secondary level reported the highest prevalence of sterilization (21.1%), followed by those with secondary education (14.8%), whereas only 1.9% among women with education above the secondary level reported sterilization. This disparity has also been observed across socio-demographic and economic levels, with the highest adjusted odds ratio (95% CI) among women with education below the secondary level, for example, among the richest wealth group [1.65 (1.58-1.73)] and among scheduled tribes [1.25 (1.18-1.32)], but not among scheduled castes. However, the opposite pattern was observed in the 25-34 [4.34 (4.08-4.61)] and 35 and above [6.38 (6.00-6.78)] age groups.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The findings show an inverse link between education and sterilization, with higher rates observed among less-educated women. This trend spans sociodemographic groups, suggesting that education enhances the awareness of and access to family planning options. Therefore, improving female education may play a pivotal role in promoting informed reproductive health decisions and reducing the disproportionate reliance on sterilization, especially among vulnerable populations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101283,"journal":{"name":"Women and Children Nursing","volume":"4 1","pages":"Pages 9-15"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Women and Children Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949751526000021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Population policies are concerned with maternal and child health, and contraceptive methods have became a priority in recent centuries, especially in underdeveloped and developing countries. Female sterilization is the predominant method of contraception, and it is assumed that every woman is aware of it as a permanent contraception method irrespective of their educational level. This study aimed to assess the impact of educational attainment on distribution of sterilization trends among women with different levels of education.

Method

Data were obtained from the fifth round of the National Family Health Survey-5 (2019–2021), of which 507,316 women were eligible for this study. We considered demographic and socioeconomic factors to model the association between sterilization preferences and the role of educational attainment in shaping their understanding and decisions.

Result

Women with education below the secondary level reported the highest prevalence of sterilization (21.1%), followed by those with secondary education (14.8%), whereas only 1.9% among women with education above the secondary level reported sterilization. This disparity has also been observed across socio-demographic and economic levels, with the highest adjusted odds ratio (95% CI) among women with education below the secondary level, for example, among the richest wealth group [1.65 (1.58-1.73)] and among scheduled tribes [1.25 (1.18-1.32)], but not among scheduled castes. However, the opposite pattern was observed in the 25-34 [4.34 (4.08-4.61)] and 35 and above [6.38 (6.00-6.78)] age groups.

Conclusion

The findings show an inverse link between education and sterilization, with higher rates observed among less-educated women. This trend spans sociodemographic groups, suggesting that education enhances the awareness of and access to family planning options. Therefore, improving female education may play a pivotal role in promoting informed reproductive health decisions and reducing the disproportionate reliance on sterilization, especially among vulnerable populations.
教育程度及其对印度妇女绝育流行率的影响
人口政策涉及孕产妇和儿童健康,近几个世纪以来,避孕方法已成为一项优先事项,特别是在不发达国家和发展中国家。女性绝育是主要的避孕方法,假定每个妇女都知道这是一种永久的避孕方法,无论其教育程度如何。本研究旨在评估教育程度对不同教育程度妇女绝育趋势分布的影响。方法数据来自第五轮国家家庭健康调查-5(2019-2021),其中507,316名妇女符合本研究的条件。我们考虑了人口和社会经济因素来模拟绝育偏好和教育程度在塑造他们的理解和决定中的作用之间的联系。结果中等以下文化程度的妇女绝育率最高(21.1%),中等教育程度的妇女次之(14.8%),中等以上文化程度的妇女绝育率仅为1.9%。在社会人口和经济水平上也观察到这种差异,在中等以下教育程度的妇女中,调整后的优势比(95% CI)最高,例如,在最富有的财富群体中[1.65(1.58-1.73)]和在计划中的部落中[1.25(1.18-1.32)],但在计划中的种姓中则没有。而25-34岁[4.34(4.08-4.61)]和35岁及以上[6.38(6.00-6.78)]年龄组则相反。结论:研究结果显示教育程度与绝育之间呈负相关,受教育程度较低的妇女的绝育率更高。这一趋势跨越了社会人口群体,表明教育提高了对计划生育选择的认识和获取。因此,改善女性教育可能在促进知情的生殖健康决定和减少对绝育的过度依赖方面发挥关键作用,特别是在弱势群体中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书