Co-producing gender knowledge in energy transitions: A grey literature perspective

IF 4.8 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Paulina Sekuła , Marta Warat , Aleksandra Wagner , Tadeusz Rudek , Vittoria Maria Peri
{"title":"Co-producing gender knowledge in energy transitions: A grey literature perspective","authors":"Paulina Sekuła ,&nbsp;Marta Warat ,&nbsp;Aleksandra Wagner ,&nbsp;Tadeusz Rudek ,&nbsp;Vittoria Maria Peri","doi":"10.1016/j.crsust.2026.100344","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper explores how the issue of gender is co-produced within the context of energy transitions, and how gendered framings in grey literature actively shape both policy and research directions in the energy field. Drawing on Sheila Jasanoff's concept of co-production and building on critical examinations of energy and sustainability transitions within capitalist and Western frameworks, we analyse how gender is not simply added onto existing energy systems, but is entangled with the epistemic, institutional, and technological configurations that underpin those systems. Based on a purposive sample of 138 grey literature documents published between 2018 and 2023, we examine how gender is framed across energy subsystems (political, economic, socio-ecological, and technological) and across multiple levels of analysis—from household to global. Our findings show that while economic and socio-ecological concerns are commonly addressed, technological domains remain largely gender-blind. Gender is often reduced to “women”, with limited intersectional analysis. Nevertheless, grey literature plays a key role in stabilizing certain visions of gender equality, contributing to the co-production of policy logics, intervention strategies, and research] agendas that define the contemporary energy transition.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34472,"journal":{"name":"Current Research in Environmental Sustainability","volume":"11 ","pages":"Article 100344"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Research in Environmental Sustainability","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666049026000125","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper explores how the issue of gender is co-produced within the context of energy transitions, and how gendered framings in grey literature actively shape both policy and research directions in the energy field. Drawing on Sheila Jasanoff's concept of co-production and building on critical examinations of energy and sustainability transitions within capitalist and Western frameworks, we analyse how gender is not simply added onto existing energy systems, but is entangled with the epistemic, institutional, and technological configurations that underpin those systems. Based on a purposive sample of 138 grey literature documents published between 2018 and 2023, we examine how gender is framed across energy subsystems (political, economic, socio-ecological, and technological) and across multiple levels of analysis—from household to global. Our findings show that while economic and socio-ecological concerns are commonly addressed, technological domains remain largely gender-blind. Gender is often reduced to “women”, with limited intersectional analysis. Nevertheless, grey literature plays a key role in stabilizing certain visions of gender equality, contributing to the co-production of policy logics, intervention strategies, and research] agendas that define the contemporary energy transition.
能源转型中共同产生的性别知识:灰色文献视角
本文探讨了在能源转型的背景下,性别问题是如何共同产生的,以及灰色文献中的性别框架如何积极地塑造能源领域的政策和研究方向。借鉴希拉·雅萨诺夫(Sheila Jasanoff)的合作生产概念,并在资本主义和西方框架内对能源和可持续性转型进行批判性考察的基础上,我们分析了性别如何不仅仅是简单地添加到现有的能源系统中,而是与支撑这些系统的认知、制度和技术配置纠缠在一起。基于2018年至2023年间发表的138份灰色文献文件的有目的样本,我们研究了性别是如何在能源子系统(政治、经济、社会生态和技术)以及从家庭到全球的多个分析层面上构建的。我们的研究结果表明,虽然经济和社会生态问题普遍得到解决,但技术领域在很大程度上仍然是性别盲。性别通常被简化为“女性”,只有有限的交叉分析。然而,灰色文献在稳定性别平等的某些愿景方面发挥着关键作用,有助于共同制定政策逻辑、干预策略和研究议程,这些议程定义了当代能源转型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Research in Environmental Sustainability
Current Research in Environmental Sustainability Environmental Science-General Environmental Science
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
9.10%
发文量
76
审稿时长
95 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书