Social ecology of complex thinking

IF 3.3
Lucian Gideon Conway III , Kendra Wales , Sarah E. Graham , Nathan D. Wright , Emily A. Smith , Kaylin I. Heller , Jaclyn L. Nichols
{"title":"Social ecology of complex thinking","authors":"Lucian Gideon Conway III ,&nbsp;Kendra Wales ,&nbsp;Sarah E. Graham ,&nbsp;Nathan D. Wright ,&nbsp;Emily A. Smith ,&nbsp;Kaylin I. Heller ,&nbsp;Jaclyn L. Nichols","doi":"10.1016/j.cresp.2026.100272","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Does socio-ecological context influence individual thought complexity? The phenomenological gap between culture-level ecological variables and individual complexity is large, and yet socio-ecological theory suggests the larger cultural context could systematically influence individual thought complexity. The present 3 studies evaluate this relationship by using culture-level ecological stressors to predict individual integrative complexity of political speeches (Studies 1 and 2) or a survey of socioecological stressor recognition to predict the complexity of open-ended opinion statements from laypersons (Study 3). Specifically, Study 1 evaluated political speeches across 9 nations from 1990 to 2023, and Study 2 evaluated political speeches across 50 U.S. states from 2000 to 2023. Increased culture-level resource scarcity was associated with lower individual-level complexity in both Studies 1 and 2, but increased economic inequality/diversity was associated with lower complexity only across nations in Study 1. Using a nationwide survey of American participants, Study 3 showed that increased awareness of socioecological stressors decreased complexity. Analysis of complexity subtypes suggest these effects are likely due to both cognitive strain (all three studies) and strategic defense of beliefs (Study 3). This multi-method, multi-national set of findings suggests that socio-ecological theories can be better applied to understand the ecological origins of complex thought.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72748,"journal":{"name":"Current research in ecological and social psychology","volume":"10 ","pages":"Article 100272"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current research in ecological and social psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666622726000110","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Does socio-ecological context influence individual thought complexity? The phenomenological gap between culture-level ecological variables and individual complexity is large, and yet socio-ecological theory suggests the larger cultural context could systematically influence individual thought complexity. The present 3 studies evaluate this relationship by using culture-level ecological stressors to predict individual integrative complexity of political speeches (Studies 1 and 2) or a survey of socioecological stressor recognition to predict the complexity of open-ended opinion statements from laypersons (Study 3). Specifically, Study 1 evaluated political speeches across 9 nations from 1990 to 2023, and Study 2 evaluated political speeches across 50 U.S. states from 2000 to 2023. Increased culture-level resource scarcity was associated with lower individual-level complexity in both Studies 1 and 2, but increased economic inequality/diversity was associated with lower complexity only across nations in Study 1. Using a nationwide survey of American participants, Study 3 showed that increased awareness of socioecological stressors decreased complexity. Analysis of complexity subtypes suggest these effects are likely due to both cognitive strain (all three studies) and strategic defense of beliefs (Study 3). This multi-method, multi-national set of findings suggests that socio-ecological theories can be better applied to understand the ecological origins of complex thought.

Abstract Image

复杂思维的社会生态学
社会生态环境是否影响个人的思维复杂性?文化层面的生态变量与个体复杂性之间的现象学差距很大,但社会生态学理论表明,更大的文化背景可能系统地影响个体的思维复杂性。目前的3项研究通过使用文化层面的生态压力源来预测政治演讲的个体整合复杂性(研究1和2)或使用社会生态压力源识别调查来预测外行人开放式意见陈述的复杂性(研究3)来评估这种关系。具体来说,研究1评估了1990年至2023年9个国家的政治演讲,研究2评估了2000年至2023年美国50个州的政治演讲。在研究1和研究2中,文化层面资源稀缺性的增加与个体层面复杂性的降低有关,但在研究1中,经济不平等/多样性的增加仅与国家间复杂性的降低有关。通过对美国参与者的全国性调查,研究3表明,对社会生态压力源的认识增加会降低复杂性。对复杂性亚型的分析表明,这些影响可能是由于认知压力(所有三项研究)和信念的战略性防御(研究3)。这种多方法、多国家的研究结果表明,社会生态学理论可以更好地应用于理解复杂思想的生态起源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
140 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书