Intraoperative Bone-Quality Assessments Are Reliable Compared with Opportunistic CT-Based Hounsfield Unit Measurements.

Jennifer Lewis,Anthony Christiano,Mary Kate Erdman,Lily Upp,Kelly Hynes,Jennifer Wolf,Jason Strelzow
{"title":"Intraoperative Bone-Quality Assessments Are Reliable Compared with Opportunistic CT-Based Hounsfield Unit Measurements.","authors":"Jennifer Lewis,Anthony Christiano,Mary Kate Erdman,Lily Upp,Kelly Hynes,Jennifer Wolf,Jason Strelzow","doi":"10.2106/jbjs.25.00551","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nBone density can impact treatment decisions for orthopaedic conditions. While ad-hoc intraoperative surgeon assessment of bone quality is common, the accuracy of such evaluation remains unknown. The primary purpose of this study was to determine whether orthopaedic surgeons' intraoperative assessment of bone quality closely correlated with validated measures.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nIn this prospective cross-sectional study, we enrolled adult patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery at a Level-I trauma center. Eligibility required an opportunistic computed tomography (CT) scan of the lumbar spine, glenoid, wrist, pelvis/femur, proximal tibia, or calcaneus. Seven surgeons, blinded to objective measures of bone quality, provided intraoperative bone-quality assessments using a 10-point Likert scale and categorized bone quality as normal, osteopenic, or osteoporotic. Hounsfield units (HUs) were measured on CT using a previously published technique. All images were reviewed by a single orthopaedic surgeon, blinded to intraoperative bone-quality assessments.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nOf the 229 patients enrolled, 215 had available CT data and were included in the study. The average age of these patients was 44 years (range, 18 to 95 years), with 40.5% being female. Over half of the patients (61%) were Black or African American, while a quarter of the patients (25%) were White. The most common surgical sites included the femur (39 patients, 18.1%), ankle (31, 14.4%), and acetabulum (26, 12.1%). A positive linear relationship between HU and surgeon bone-quality assessments was observed (r = 0.66; p < 0.0001), which was consistent across surgical anatomic sites. Abnormal bone quality was correctly identified by surgeon assessment with 84% sensitivity and 97% specificity.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nThis study demonstrated that surgeons can reliably detect abnormal bone quality through intraoperative assessment across numerous surgical sites. Intraoperative assessments may provide actionable and reliable feedback regarding bone density without additional cost or radiation in cases when opportunistic scans are not available. This information can inform intraoperative decision-making and presents opportunities for bone-health interventions.\r\n\r\nLEVEL OF EVIDENCE\r\nDiagnostic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.","PeriodicalId":22625,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.25.00551","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND Bone density can impact treatment decisions for orthopaedic conditions. While ad-hoc intraoperative surgeon assessment of bone quality is common, the accuracy of such evaluation remains unknown. The primary purpose of this study was to determine whether orthopaedic surgeons' intraoperative assessment of bone quality closely correlated with validated measures. METHODS In this prospective cross-sectional study, we enrolled adult patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery at a Level-I trauma center. Eligibility required an opportunistic computed tomography (CT) scan of the lumbar spine, glenoid, wrist, pelvis/femur, proximal tibia, or calcaneus. Seven surgeons, blinded to objective measures of bone quality, provided intraoperative bone-quality assessments using a 10-point Likert scale and categorized bone quality as normal, osteopenic, or osteoporotic. Hounsfield units (HUs) were measured on CT using a previously published technique. All images were reviewed by a single orthopaedic surgeon, blinded to intraoperative bone-quality assessments. RESULTS Of the 229 patients enrolled, 215 had available CT data and were included in the study. The average age of these patients was 44 years (range, 18 to 95 years), with 40.5% being female. Over half of the patients (61%) were Black or African American, while a quarter of the patients (25%) were White. The most common surgical sites included the femur (39 patients, 18.1%), ankle (31, 14.4%), and acetabulum (26, 12.1%). A positive linear relationship between HU and surgeon bone-quality assessments was observed (r = 0.66; p < 0.0001), which was consistent across surgical anatomic sites. Abnormal bone quality was correctly identified by surgeon assessment with 84% sensitivity and 97% specificity. CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrated that surgeons can reliably detect abnormal bone quality through intraoperative assessment across numerous surgical sites. Intraoperative assessments may provide actionable and reliable feedback regarding bone density without additional cost or radiation in cases when opportunistic scans are not available. This information can inform intraoperative decision-making and presents opportunities for bone-health interventions. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Diagnostic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
术中骨质量评估与基于ct的Hounsfield单位测量比较可靠。
骨密度可以影响骨科疾病的治疗决策。虽然术中外科医生对骨质量的特别评估是常见的,但这种评估的准确性仍然未知。本研究的主要目的是确定骨科医生术中对骨质量的评估是否与有效措施密切相关。方法在这项前瞻性横断面研究中,我们招募了在一级创伤中心接受骨科手术的成年患者。入选资格要求对腰椎、肩关节、手腕、骨盆/股骨、胫骨近端或跟骨进行计算机断层扫描(CT)。7名外科医生,不知道客观的骨质量测量,使用10分李克特量表进行术中骨质量评估,并将骨质量分为正常、骨质减少或骨质疏松。Hounsfield单位(HUs)采用先前发表的技术在CT上测量。所有图像由一名骨科医生检查,术中对骨质量评估不知情。结果229例入组患者中,215例有可用的CT数据并纳入研究。这些患者的平均年龄为44岁(18 ~ 95岁),40.5%为女性。超过一半的患者(61%)是黑人或非裔美国人,而四分之一的患者(25%)是白人。最常见的手术部位包括股骨(39例,18.1%)、踝关节(31例,14.4%)和髋臼(26例,12.1%)。观察到HU与外科医生骨质量评估呈正线性关系(r = 0.66; p < 0.0001),这在手术解剖部位是一致的。异常骨质量通过外科医生评估正确识别,敏感性为84%,特异性为97%。结论:本研究表明,外科医生可以通过术中对多个手术部位进行评估,可靠地检测出骨质量异常。术中评估可以提供关于骨密度的可操作和可靠的反馈,而不需要额外的费用或辐射,在没有机会扫描的情况下。这些信息可以为术中决策提供信息,并为骨骼健康干预提供机会。证据水平诊断二级。有关证据水平的完整描述,请参见作者说明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书