Communicating Safely: Standardizing Nursing Clinical Reports in a Neonatal Unit.

IF 1.6
Margaret Broom, Laura Briguglio, Mekha Sam, Lori Grlj, Joelle Martinoski, Clare O'Brien
{"title":"Communicating Safely: Standardizing Nursing Clinical Reports in a Neonatal Unit.","authors":"Margaret Broom, Laura Briguglio, Mekha Sam, Lori Grlj, Joelle Martinoski, Clare O'Brien","doi":"10.1097/ANC.0000000000001359","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Clinical documentation during nursing handovers is critical for safe neonatal care. Poorly structured or inconsistent documentation can lead to miscommunication, delayed interventions, and fragmented care. A 2021 audit in a tertiary neonatal unit revealed only 2% of nursing handover reports followed the recommended Introduction, Subjective, Objective, Assessment, Plan (ISOAP) format, posing significant risks to patient safety.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This quality improvement initiative aimed to improve compliance with ISOAP documentation format for nursing handovers in a tertiary Neonatal Intensive Care and Special Care Nursery (NICU/SCN), addressing both paper-based and digital systems.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 3-year quality improvement project was conducted using the Institute for Healthcare Improvement's Model for Improvement. Two Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles were implemented. PDSA Cycle 1 focused on paper-based documentation, while PDSA Cycle 2 targeted Digital Health Records (DHR). Interventions included the development of neonatal-specific ISOAP templates, education sessions, peer mentorship, visual reminders, and ongoing staff support. Compliance was measured through pre- and post-intervention audits.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Baseline adherence was 2% in February 2021. Following PDSA Cycle 1, adherence rose to 78% by January 2022 and reached 100% by March 2022. During the DHR transition, adherence improved from 65% in May 2023 to 92% by July 2023. Staff reported improved clarity, enhanced communication, reduced time required for clinical reviews, and greater satisfaction with documentation processes.</p><p><strong>Implications for practice and research: </strong>Structured education, standardized templates, and peer support effectively improved documentation compliance. Future research should explore the impact of standardized handover documentation on neonatal outcomes and further strategies for optimizing digital implementation.</p>","PeriodicalId":520547,"journal":{"name":"Advances in neonatal care : official journal of the National Association of Neonatal Nurses","volume":" ","pages":"255-260"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in neonatal care : official journal of the National Association of Neonatal Nurses","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ANC.0000000000001359","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Clinical documentation during nursing handovers is critical for safe neonatal care. Poorly structured or inconsistent documentation can lead to miscommunication, delayed interventions, and fragmented care. A 2021 audit in a tertiary neonatal unit revealed only 2% of nursing handover reports followed the recommended Introduction, Subjective, Objective, Assessment, Plan (ISOAP) format, posing significant risks to patient safety.

Purpose: This quality improvement initiative aimed to improve compliance with ISOAP documentation format for nursing handovers in a tertiary Neonatal Intensive Care and Special Care Nursery (NICU/SCN), addressing both paper-based and digital systems.

Methods: A 3-year quality improvement project was conducted using the Institute for Healthcare Improvement's Model for Improvement. Two Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles were implemented. PDSA Cycle 1 focused on paper-based documentation, while PDSA Cycle 2 targeted Digital Health Records (DHR). Interventions included the development of neonatal-specific ISOAP templates, education sessions, peer mentorship, visual reminders, and ongoing staff support. Compliance was measured through pre- and post-intervention audits.

Results: Baseline adherence was 2% in February 2021. Following PDSA Cycle 1, adherence rose to 78% by January 2022 and reached 100% by March 2022. During the DHR transition, adherence improved from 65% in May 2023 to 92% by July 2023. Staff reported improved clarity, enhanced communication, reduced time required for clinical reviews, and greater satisfaction with documentation processes.

Implications for practice and research: Structured education, standardized templates, and peer support effectively improved documentation compliance. Future research should explore the impact of standardized handover documentation on neonatal outcomes and further strategies for optimizing digital implementation.

安全沟通:标准化新生儿护理临床报告。
背景:护理交接期间的临床记录对新生儿的安全护理至关重要。结构不良或不一致的文件可能导致沟通不畅、干预措施延迟和护理分散。2021年对一家三级新生儿病房的审计显示,只有2%的护理交接报告遵循了推荐的介绍、主观、客观、评估、计划(ISOAP)格式,对患者安全构成重大风险。目的:本质量改进计划旨在提高三级新生儿重症监护室和特殊护理室(NICU/SCN)护理移交对ISOAP文件格式的遵从性,涉及纸质和数字系统。方法:采用卫生保健改进研究所的改进模型进行为期3年的质量改进项目。实施了两个计划-执行-研究-行动(PDSA)循环。PDSA周期1侧重于纸质文档,而PDSA周期2则针对数字健康记录(DHR)。干预措施包括开发针对新生儿的ISOAP模板、教育课程、同伴指导、视觉提醒和持续的工作人员支持。通过干预前和干预后的审计来衡量依从性。结果:2021年2月基线依从性为2%。在PDSA周期1之后,到2022年1月,依从性上升到78%,到2022年3月达到100%。在DHR过渡期间,依从性从2023年5月的65%提高到2023年7月的92%。工作人员报告说,清晰度提高了,沟通加强了,临床审查所需时间减少了,对文件编制过程的满意度提高了。对实践和研究的启示:结构化教育、标准化模板和同伴支持有效地改进了文档遵从性。未来的研究应探讨标准化交接文件对新生儿结局的影响,以及进一步优化数字化实施的策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书