Disproportionate Use of Security Response Codes on Black Patients in a Quaternary Academic Center.

Emily Mitchell, Ravneet K Waraich, Sophie Goldman, Jacob T Luty, Jeff Gold, Andrea Smeraglio
{"title":"Disproportionate Use of Security Response Codes on Black Patients in a Quaternary Academic Center.","authors":"Emily Mitchell, Ravneet K Waraich, Sophie Goldman, Jacob T Luty, Jeff Gold, Andrea Smeraglio","doi":"10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000305","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Hospitals use security emergency response codes (SERCs) to manage security threats. This study explored the demographics of SERCs in an academic hospital setting in the Pacific Northwest. A retrospective chart review of all adult emergency department and inpatient encounters between January 2022 and July 2023 was performed. Age-adjusted standardized event ratios were calculated for each racial category and compared using a standardized rate ratio (SRR). Among the 60 957 eligible encounters over the study period, 411 SERCs occurred across 273 (0.45%) encounters. Compared with the demographics of all hospital encounters, SERCs occurred more frequently with patients who were male (n = 2313, 76.2%), English-speaking (n = 402, 97.8%), and younger (18-70 years old, n = 331, 80.6%). A total of 348 SERCs occurred among white individuals, 34 among Black individuals, and 29 among individuals of other racial groups. The age-adjusted standardized event ratio was 1.66 for Black individuals, 0.98 for white individuals, and 0.82 for individuals of other racial groups. The SRR (Black vs white) was 1.70 (95% CI, 1.20-2.40; P = 0.003), indicating a 70% higher standardized event rate among Black individuals compared with White individuals. The SRR (Black vs other racial groups) was 2.02, indicating a 202% higher standardized event rate among Black individuals compared with individuals of other racial groups. This study demonstrates disparities in the frequency of SERC utilization against Black patients. Further investigation into the etiologies leading to SERCs and improved mechanisms of SERC tracking should be undertaken.</p>","PeriodicalId":101338,"journal":{"name":"American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical Quality","volume":" ","pages":"173-177"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical Quality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000305","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Hospitals use security emergency response codes (SERCs) to manage security threats. This study explored the demographics of SERCs in an academic hospital setting in the Pacific Northwest. A retrospective chart review of all adult emergency department and inpatient encounters between January 2022 and July 2023 was performed. Age-adjusted standardized event ratios were calculated for each racial category and compared using a standardized rate ratio (SRR). Among the 60 957 eligible encounters over the study period, 411 SERCs occurred across 273 (0.45%) encounters. Compared with the demographics of all hospital encounters, SERCs occurred more frequently with patients who were male (n = 2313, 76.2%), English-speaking (n = 402, 97.8%), and younger (18-70 years old, n = 331, 80.6%). A total of 348 SERCs occurred among white individuals, 34 among Black individuals, and 29 among individuals of other racial groups. The age-adjusted standardized event ratio was 1.66 for Black individuals, 0.98 for white individuals, and 0.82 for individuals of other racial groups. The SRR (Black vs white) was 1.70 (95% CI, 1.20-2.40; P = 0.003), indicating a 70% higher standardized event rate among Black individuals compared with White individuals. The SRR (Black vs other racial groups) was 2.02, indicating a 202% higher standardized event rate among Black individuals compared with individuals of other racial groups. This study demonstrates disparities in the frequency of SERC utilization against Black patients. Further investigation into the etiologies leading to SERCs and improved mechanisms of SERC tracking should be undertaken.

第四纪学术中心黑人患者安全响应码使用不当。
医院使用安全紧急响应代码(serc)来管理安全威胁。本研究探讨了太平洋西北地区一家学术医院SERCs的人口统计学特征。对2022年1月至2023年7月期间所有成人急诊科和住院患者进行回顾性图表审查。计算每个种族类别的年龄调整标准化事件比率,并使用标准化比率(SRR)进行比较。在研究期间的60957例符合条件的就诊中,273例(0.45%)就诊中发生了411例SERCs。与所有医院就诊的人口统计数据相比,SERCs在男性(n = 2313, 76.2%)、英语(n = 402, 97.8%)和年轻(18-70岁,n = 3331, 80.6%)患者中发生的频率更高。其中,白人发生348例,黑人34例,其他种族29例。年龄调整后的标准化事件比黑人为1.66,白人为0.98,其他种族为0.82。SRR(黑人与白人)为1.70 (95% CI, 1.20-2.40; P = 0.003),表明黑人个体的标准化事件发生率比白人个体高70%。SRR(黑人与其他种族)为2.02,表明黑人个体的标准化事件发生率比其他种族个体高202%。本研究证明了黑人患者SERC使用频率的差异。应进一步研究SERC的病因和改进SERC跟踪机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书