From silos to synergy: assessing tuberculosis basic management units readiness for integrated diabetes mellitus care across different districts of Pakistan.

IF 1.7
Saima Aleem, Saima Afaq, Bilal Ahmad, Zala, Haroon Latif Khan, Zohaib Khan
{"title":"From silos to synergy: assessing tuberculosis basic management units readiness for integrated diabetes mellitus care across different districts of Pakistan.","authors":"Saima Aleem, Saima Afaq, Bilal Ahmad, Zala, Haroon Latif Khan, Zohaib Khan","doi":"10.1017/S146342362610111X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The dual burden of tuberculosis (TB) and diabetes mellitus (DM) presents a growing challenge for health systems in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), including Pakistan. Despite global and national policies advocating for integrated care, evidence on health facility readiness to operationalize integration remains scarce. This study assessed the readiness of TB basic management units (BMUs) to deliver integrated TB-DM care and explored implementation barriers using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted an explanatory sequential mixed-methods study from September 2024 to February 2025 across 13 TB BMUs in five districts of Pakistan. Quantitative readiness data were collected using a structured tool adapted from the WHO Service Availability and Readiness Assessment (SARA), generating a composite score across four domains. Subsequently, qualitative data were gathered through multi-stakeholder focus group discussions with healthcare providers, facility managers, patients, caregivers, and policymakers. Reflexive thematic analysis was conducted and mapped to CFIR Inner Setting constructs to contextualize quantitative findings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Only one facility demonstrated high readiness, while 12 showed low readiness. Facilities lacked routine comorbidity screening, trained staff, diagnostic capacity, and essential medicines. Key barriers included inadequate infrastructure, workforce shortages, fragmented information systems, and low prioritisation of integrated care. Financial constraints and limited coordination further hindered implementation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study highlights critically low readiness among TB facilities in different districts of Pakistan to deliver integrated TB-DM care, reflecting systemic weaknesses across core domains. Strengthening systems, building capacity, and improving integration strategies are essential to bridge gaps between policy and practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":74493,"journal":{"name":"Primary health care research & development","volume":"27 ","pages":"e47"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13080535/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Primary health care research & development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S146342362610111X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The dual burden of tuberculosis (TB) and diabetes mellitus (DM) presents a growing challenge for health systems in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), including Pakistan. Despite global and national policies advocating for integrated care, evidence on health facility readiness to operationalize integration remains scarce. This study assessed the readiness of TB basic management units (BMUs) to deliver integrated TB-DM care and explored implementation barriers using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR).

Methods: We conducted an explanatory sequential mixed-methods study from September 2024 to February 2025 across 13 TB BMUs in five districts of Pakistan. Quantitative readiness data were collected using a structured tool adapted from the WHO Service Availability and Readiness Assessment (SARA), generating a composite score across four domains. Subsequently, qualitative data were gathered through multi-stakeholder focus group discussions with healthcare providers, facility managers, patients, caregivers, and policymakers. Reflexive thematic analysis was conducted and mapped to CFIR Inner Setting constructs to contextualize quantitative findings.

Results: Only one facility demonstrated high readiness, while 12 showed low readiness. Facilities lacked routine comorbidity screening, trained staff, diagnostic capacity, and essential medicines. Key barriers included inadequate infrastructure, workforce shortages, fragmented information systems, and low prioritisation of integrated care. Financial constraints and limited coordination further hindered implementation.

Conclusion: This study highlights critically low readiness among TB facilities in different districts of Pakistan to deliver integrated TB-DM care, reflecting systemic weaknesses across core domains. Strengthening systems, building capacity, and improving integration strategies are essential to bridge gaps between policy and practice.

从孤立到协同:评估巴基斯坦不同地区结核病基本管理单位对综合糖尿病护理的准备情况。
背景:结核病(TB)和糖尿病(DM)的双重负担对包括巴基斯坦在内的低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs)的卫生系统构成了日益严峻的挑战。尽管全球和国家政策倡导综合护理,但关于卫生设施准备实施综合护理的证据仍然很少。本研究评估了结核病基本管理单位(BMUs)提供结核病-糖尿病综合治疗的准备情况,并利用实施研究综合框架(CFIR)探讨了实施障碍。方法:从2024年9月到2025年2月,我们对巴基斯坦5个地区的13个TB bmu进行了一项解释性顺序混合方法研究。使用改编自世卫组织服务可用性和准备情况评估(SARA)的结构化工具收集了定量准备情况数据,生成了四个领域的综合得分。随后,通过与医疗保健提供者、设施管理人员、患者、护理人员和政策制定者的多利益相关者焦点小组讨论,收集了定性数据。我们进行了反身性主题分析,并将其映射到CFIR内部设置结构中,以将定量结果置于语境中。结果:只有1个设施为高准备就绪,12个设施为低准备就绪。设施缺乏常规的合并症筛查、训练有素的工作人员、诊断能力和基本药物。主要障碍包括基础设施不足、劳动力短缺、信息系统碎片化以及综合护理的优先度低。财政限制和有限的协调进一步阻碍了执行。结论:本研究突出表明,巴基斯坦不同地区的结核病机构提供结核病-糖尿病综合治疗的准备程度极低,反映了核心领域的系统性弱点。加强制度、建设能力和改进一体化战略对于弥合政策与实践之间的差距至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书