Prescription for Change: A Web-Based Cross-Sectional Survey on How Physicians' Relationships with Pharma Reps Are Associated with Views on Stricter Industry Guidelines.

IF 1.8 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
JMA journal Pub Date : 2026-03-16 Epub Date: 2026-02-27 DOI:10.31662/jmaj.2025-0103
Michioki Endo, Hiroaki Saito, Yoshitake Takebayashi, Michio Murakami, Tetsuya Tanimoto, Akihiko Ozaki
{"title":"Prescription for Change: A Web-Based Cross-Sectional Survey on How Physicians' Relationships with Pharma Reps Are Associated with Views on Stricter Industry Guidelines.","authors":"Michioki Endo, Hiroaki Saito, Yoshitake Takebayashi, Michio Murakami, Tetsuya Tanimoto, Akihiko Ozaki","doi":"10.31662/jmaj.2025-0103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Japan, the world's third-largest pharmaceutical market, introduced new guidelines in 2019 to address ethical concerns in pharmaceutical company-physician relationships. This study aimed to analyze Japanese physicians' attitudes toward these strengthened regulations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An online survey of 1,203 Japanese physicians was conducted in November 2019. Respondents were categorized based on their frequency of interaction with pharmaceutical companies: frequent (82, 6.8%), moderate (930, 77.3%), or rare (191, 15.9%). The survey assessed awareness of the new guidelines, perceived changes in promotional activities, and attitudes toward stricter regulations. Multivariable modified Poisson regression was used to identify factors associated with opposition to the regulations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 640 (53.3%) respondents opposed stricter regulations, while 325 (27.1%) were in favor. Physicians with frequent (adjusted Incidence Rate Ratio [aIRR] 1.61, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.24-2.10) or moderate (aIRR 1.53, 95% CI 1.24-1.89) interactions were more likely to oppose regulations compared with those with rare interactions. Hospital directors/managers, those affiliated with private institutions, and recent graduates also showed higher opposition. The main reason for favoring regulations was to promote healthy industry relationships (38, 9.3%), while the primary concern among those opposed was related to information gathering or potential patient disadvantages (88, 21.6%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study reveals diverse views on industry-physician relations in Japan. Frequent interactions and leadership roles correlate with opposition to stricter regulations. The results suggest a need for balanced policies that consider varied perspectives.</p>","PeriodicalId":73550,"journal":{"name":"JMA journal","volume":"9 2","pages":"457-466"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13058698/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMA journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31662/jmaj.2025-0103","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Japan, the world's third-largest pharmaceutical market, introduced new guidelines in 2019 to address ethical concerns in pharmaceutical company-physician relationships. This study aimed to analyze Japanese physicians' attitudes toward these strengthened regulations.

Methods: An online survey of 1,203 Japanese physicians was conducted in November 2019. Respondents were categorized based on their frequency of interaction with pharmaceutical companies: frequent (82, 6.8%), moderate (930, 77.3%), or rare (191, 15.9%). The survey assessed awareness of the new guidelines, perceived changes in promotional activities, and attitudes toward stricter regulations. Multivariable modified Poisson regression was used to identify factors associated with opposition to the regulations.

Results: A total of 640 (53.3%) respondents opposed stricter regulations, while 325 (27.1%) were in favor. Physicians with frequent (adjusted Incidence Rate Ratio [aIRR] 1.61, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.24-2.10) or moderate (aIRR 1.53, 95% CI 1.24-1.89) interactions were more likely to oppose regulations compared with those with rare interactions. Hospital directors/managers, those affiliated with private institutions, and recent graduates also showed higher opposition. The main reason for favoring regulations was to promote healthy industry relationships (38, 9.3%), while the primary concern among those opposed was related to information gathering or potential patient disadvantages (88, 21.6%).

Conclusions: The study reveals diverse views on industry-physician relations in Japan. Frequent interactions and leadership roles correlate with opposition to stricter regulations. The results suggest a need for balanced policies that consider varied perspectives.

改变处方:一项基于网络的横断面调查,关于医生与制药代表的关系如何与更严格的行业指导方针的观点相关联。
导语:作为世界第三大制药市场,日本于2019年推出了新的指导方针,以解决制药公司与医生关系中的伦理问题。本研究旨在分析日本医师对这些加强的法规的态度。方法:于2019年11月对1203名日本医生进行在线调查。受访者根据他们与制药公司互动的频率进行分类:频繁(82人,6.8%)、中度(930人,77.3%)或罕见(191人,15.9%)。该调查评估了人们对新指导方针的认识、对促销活动变化的看法以及对更严格规定的态度。使用多变量修正泊松回归来确定与反对规定相关的因素。结果:640人(53.3%)反对更严格的监管,325人(27.1%)赞成。频繁相互作用(调整后发病率比[aIRR] 1.61, 95%可信区间[CI] 1.24-2.10)或中度相互作用(调整后发病率比[aIRR] 1.53, 95%可信区间[CI] 1.24-1.89)的医生与很少相互作用的医生相比,更有可能反对相关规定。医院院长/经理、私立机构所属人员、应届毕业生的反对率也较高。支持监管的主要原因是促进健康的行业关系(38人,9.3%),而反对监管的主要原因是信息收集或潜在的患者劣势(88人,21.6%)。结论:本研究揭示了对日本产医关系的不同看法。频繁的互动和领导角色与反对更严格的规定有关。研究结果表明,需要制定兼顾不同观点的平衡政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书