The Willingness to Utilize Psychological Health Applications Among Saudis: A Study Guided by the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT).

IF 3 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Hessah F Alhugbani
{"title":"The Willingness to Utilize Psychological Health Applications Among Saudis: A Study Guided by the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT).","authors":"Hessah F Alhugbani","doi":"10.1177/00469580261437649","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Digital mental health interventions are increasingly used to address gaps in access to psychological services in Saudi Arabia. However, cultural, technological, and usability factors may shape public acceptance of these tools. This study examines the willingness of Saudis to use the Labayh mental health application, guided by the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT), focusing on the roles of performance expectancy, effort expectancy, social influence, and facilitating conditions. A cross-sectional online survey was administered to adult participants (n = 307). Validated UTAUT measures were used, and multiple regression analyses tested the effects of the 4 constructs on behavioral intention to use the application. The findings supported 3 of the 4 UTAUT constructs. Performance expectancy was the strongest predictor of behavioral intention. Effort expectancy also had a significant effect, indicating that ease of use increased adoption. Social influence significantly predicted intention, particularly among younger respondents, underscoring the role of peers, family, and clinicians. By contrast, facilitating conditions were not significant, likely reflecting a ceiling effect whereby most participants already possessed sufficient access and technical readiness, making this factor less relevant. These results indicate that acceptance of digital mental health applications in Saudi Arabia is primarily driven by perceived usefulness, ease of use, and social endorsement, whereas infrastructure plays a limited role. Efforts to increase adoption should prioritize culturally sensitive communication, usability-centered design, and engagement with trusted social and clinical influencers to encourage sustained uptake across diverse groups of users nationwide. No clinical trial registration applies.</p>","PeriodicalId":54976,"journal":{"name":"Inquiry-The Journal of Health Care Organization Provision and Financing","volume":"63 ","pages":"469580261437649"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13070158/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Inquiry-The Journal of Health Care Organization Provision and Financing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00469580261437649","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Digital mental health interventions are increasingly used to address gaps in access to psychological services in Saudi Arabia. However, cultural, technological, and usability factors may shape public acceptance of these tools. This study examines the willingness of Saudis to use the Labayh mental health application, guided by the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT), focusing on the roles of performance expectancy, effort expectancy, social influence, and facilitating conditions. A cross-sectional online survey was administered to adult participants (n = 307). Validated UTAUT measures were used, and multiple regression analyses tested the effects of the 4 constructs on behavioral intention to use the application. The findings supported 3 of the 4 UTAUT constructs. Performance expectancy was the strongest predictor of behavioral intention. Effort expectancy also had a significant effect, indicating that ease of use increased adoption. Social influence significantly predicted intention, particularly among younger respondents, underscoring the role of peers, family, and clinicians. By contrast, facilitating conditions were not significant, likely reflecting a ceiling effect whereby most participants already possessed sufficient access and technical readiness, making this factor less relevant. These results indicate that acceptance of digital mental health applications in Saudi Arabia is primarily driven by perceived usefulness, ease of use, and social endorsement, whereas infrastructure plays a limited role. Efforts to increase adoption should prioritize culturally sensitive communication, usability-centered design, and engagement with trusted social and clinical influencers to encourage sustained uptake across diverse groups of users nationwide. No clinical trial registration applies.

沙特人利用心理健康应用的意愿:一项以技术接受和使用统一理论(UTAUT)为指导的研究。
在沙特阿拉伯,数字心理健康干预措施越来越多地用于解决获得心理服务方面的差距。然而,文化、技术和可用性因素可能会影响公众对这些工具的接受程度。本研究在技术接受与使用统一理论(UTAUT)的指导下,考察了沙特人使用Labayh心理健康应用程序的意愿,重点关注绩效预期、努力预期、社会影响和促进条件的作用。对成人参与者进行横断面在线调查(n = 307)。使用经过验证的UTAUT测量,并进行多元回归分析,测试了4个构念对使用应用程序的行为意图的影响。研究结果支持4种UTAUT结构中的3种。表现预期是行为意向的最强预测因子。工作预期也有显著的影响,表明易用性增加了采用率。社会影响显著地预测了意向,特别是在年轻受访者中,强调了同伴、家庭和临床医生的作用。相比之下,便利条件并不重要,可能反映了一种天花板效应,即大多数参与者已经拥有充分的机会和技术准备,使这一因素不那么重要。这些结果表明,沙特阿拉伯对数字心理健康应用的接受主要是由感知有用性、易用性和社会认可驱动的,而基础设施发挥的作用有限。提高采用率的努力应该优先考虑文化敏感的沟通,以可用性为中心的设计,以及与值得信赖的社会和临床影响者的接触,以鼓励全国不同用户群体的持续采用。不适用临床试验注册。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
192
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: INQUIRY is a peer-reviewed open access journal whose msision is to to improve health by sharing research spanning health care, including public health, health services, and health policy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书