Fatih Süleyman Okumuş, İlkem Ceren Sığırtmaç, Özge Buket Arslan, Deran Oskay, Çiğdem Öksüz
{"title":"The development of a 3D-printed relative motion orthosis and field testing of 3D and thermoplastic tape relative motion orthoses.","authors":"Fatih Süleyman Okumuş, İlkem Ceren Sığırtmaç, Özge Buket Arslan, Deran Oskay, Çiğdem Öksüz","doi":"10.1016/j.jht.2026.02.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Three-dimensional (3D) printing offers an alternative for orthotic fabrication, particularly where thermoplastics are costly or not readily available. This report explored a universal-design 3D-printed relative motion orthosis and compared short-term user satisfaction with custom thermoplastic tape (Orficast) relative motion flexion orthoses.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To design and produce universal 3D-printed relative motion orthosis using iterative prototyping and compare it with custom thermoplastic tape relative motion flexion orthoses.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Comparative field test with iterative prototype development.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study had two phases. In phase 1, a universal-design 3D relative motion orthosis was developed using repeated design-print-fit-refine cycles with feedback from an expert focus group. In phase 2, patients with Burton stage I boutonnière deformity were randomly assigned to wear either a 3D-printed relative motion flexion orthosis or a custom thermoplastic tape relative motion flexion orthosis for 1 week. User satisfaction was evaluated using the Turkish version of the Orthotics Prosthetics Users Survey (OPUS) satisfaction module.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four prototypes and two final designs were produced; the final design met the focus-group checklist criteria. Forty participants were randomized (20 per group); nonadherence by four 3D group participants resulted in exclusion, leaving 16 (3D printed orthoses) and 20 (thermoplastic orthoses) for analysis (n = 36). OPUS Satisfaction scores did not differ significantly between groups after 1 week (3D printed orthoses: 93.19 ± 6.28 vs thermoplastic orthoses: 89.35 ± 11.17; p = 0.24). The material cost was €2.75 (US$3.19) for the 3D-printed orthosis vs €7.50 (US$8.70) for the thermoplastic tape orthosis in our setting.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this study 3D printing lowered material costs and reduced therapist time compared to custom thermoplastic tape relative motion flexion orthoses. Patients with stage 1 Burton boutonniere deformity wearing the 3D-printed or custom thermoplastic tape relative motion flexion orthoses reported comparable satisfaction after 1-week wear time.</p>","PeriodicalId":54814,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand Therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hand Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jht.2026.02.005","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Three-dimensional (3D) printing offers an alternative for orthotic fabrication, particularly where thermoplastics are costly or not readily available. This report explored a universal-design 3D-printed relative motion orthosis and compared short-term user satisfaction with custom thermoplastic tape (Orficast) relative motion flexion orthoses.
Purpose: To design and produce universal 3D-printed relative motion orthosis using iterative prototyping and compare it with custom thermoplastic tape relative motion flexion orthoses.
Study design: Comparative field test with iterative prototype development.
Methods: The study had two phases. In phase 1, a universal-design 3D relative motion orthosis was developed using repeated design-print-fit-refine cycles with feedback from an expert focus group. In phase 2, patients with Burton stage I boutonnière deformity were randomly assigned to wear either a 3D-printed relative motion flexion orthosis or a custom thermoplastic tape relative motion flexion orthosis for 1 week. User satisfaction was evaluated using the Turkish version of the Orthotics Prosthetics Users Survey (OPUS) satisfaction module.
Results: Four prototypes and two final designs were produced; the final design met the focus-group checklist criteria. Forty participants were randomized (20 per group); nonadherence by four 3D group participants resulted in exclusion, leaving 16 (3D printed orthoses) and 20 (thermoplastic orthoses) for analysis (n = 36). OPUS Satisfaction scores did not differ significantly between groups after 1 week (3D printed orthoses: 93.19 ± 6.28 vs thermoplastic orthoses: 89.35 ± 11.17; p = 0.24). The material cost was €2.75 (US$3.19) for the 3D-printed orthosis vs €7.50 (US$8.70) for the thermoplastic tape orthosis in our setting.
Conclusions: In this study 3D printing lowered material costs and reduced therapist time compared to custom thermoplastic tape relative motion flexion orthoses. Patients with stage 1 Burton boutonniere deformity wearing the 3D-printed or custom thermoplastic tape relative motion flexion orthoses reported comparable satisfaction after 1-week wear time.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Hand Therapy is designed for hand therapists, occupational and physical therapists, and other hand specialists involved in the rehabilitation of disabling hand problems. The Journal functions as a source of education and information by publishing scientific and clinical articles. Regular features include original reports, clinical reviews, case studies, editorials, and book reviews.