Perceiving and Modeling the Scope of Question Focus in Korean.

IF 1.1 2区 文学 Q3 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Stephen M Jones, Yoolim Kim, Cong Zhang
{"title":"Perceiving and Modeling the Scope of Question Focus in Korean.","authors":"Stephen M Jones, Yoolim Kim, Cong Zhang","doi":"10.1177/00238309261419799","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The precise nature of the prosodic contribution to disambiguating open and polar questions with indefinite content pro-forms in Korean (e.g., <i>nwukwu</i> \"who/someone\") remains a matter of debate. One possible relevant prosodic feature is expanded F0 range at the site of question focus. We report the results of a pilot experiment followed by a large-scale online speech perception gating study <math><mrow><mrow><mo>(</mo><mrow><mi>n</mi><mo>=</mo><mn>124</mn></mrow><mo>)</mo></mrow></mrow></math> that manipulated the natural prosody of identical strings read as statements or open or polar questions. We found a tendency for all questions to be perceived as open questions, regardless of prosody. Open questions were reliably disambiguated from other utterance types, and there was no effect of the prosodic manipulation. Polar questions did show a significant effect of the prosodic manipulation <math><mrow><mrow><mo>(</mo><mrow><mi>p</mi><mo><</mo><mo>.</mo><mn>001</mn></mrow><mo>)</mo></mrow><mo>,</mo></mrow></math> but even with full natural prosody, these stimuli were never correctly identified above chance levels. We suggest that in the absence of context, there is a strong preference for hearers to interpret content pro-forms as question words, and that subsequent prosodic information may be discounted if a hearer has already committed to their interpretation. The present findings have implications for formal accounts of the Korean syntax-prosody interface.</p>","PeriodicalId":51255,"journal":{"name":"Language and Speech","volume":" ","pages":"238309261419799"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Language and Speech","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00238309261419799","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The precise nature of the prosodic contribution to disambiguating open and polar questions with indefinite content pro-forms in Korean (e.g., nwukwu "who/someone") remains a matter of debate. One possible relevant prosodic feature is expanded F0 range at the site of question focus. We report the results of a pilot experiment followed by a large-scale online speech perception gating study (n=124) that manipulated the natural prosody of identical strings read as statements or open or polar questions. We found a tendency for all questions to be perceived as open questions, regardless of prosody. Open questions were reliably disambiguated from other utterance types, and there was no effect of the prosodic manipulation. Polar questions did show a significant effect of the prosodic manipulation (p<.001), but even with full natural prosody, these stimuli were never correctly identified above chance levels. We suggest that in the absence of context, there is a strong preference for hearers to interpret content pro-forms as question words, and that subsequent prosodic information may be discounted if a hearer has already committed to their interpretation. The present findings have implications for formal accounts of the Korean syntax-prosody interface.

韩国语问题焦点范围的感知与塑造。
在韩语中,韵律对带有不确定内容形式的开放疑问句和极性疑问句(例如,nwukwu“谁/某人”)的消歧作用的确切性质仍然存在争议。一个可能的相关韵律特征是在问题焦点处扩大F0范围。我们报告了一项试点实验的结果,随后是一项大规模的在线语音感知门控研究(n=124),该研究操纵了作为语句或开放性或极性问题阅读的相同字符串的自然韵律。我们发现,所有问题都倾向于被视为开放问题,而不管韵律如何。开放性问题与其他话语类型的歧义消除是可靠的,并且没有韵律操纵的影响。极性问题确实显示出韵律操纵的显著影响(p.001),但即使是完全自然的韵律,这些刺激也从未被正确识别。我们认为,在没有上下文的情况下,听者会强烈倾向于将内容形式解释为疑问词,如果听者已经承诺了他们的解释,那么随后的韵律信息可能会被打折。本研究结果对韩语句法韵律界面的正式描述具有启示意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Language and Speech
Language and Speech AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
39
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Language and Speech is a peer-reviewed journal which provides an international forum for communication among researchers in the disciplines that contribute to our understanding of the production, perception, processing, learning, use, and disorders of speech and language. The journal accepts reports of original research in all these areas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书