From Wise Counselors to Clinical Ethicists: Historical Milestones and Their Impact on Professional Identity Formation.

IF 1.6 4区 哲学 Q3 ETHICS
Anita J Tarzian
{"title":"From Wise Counselors to Clinical Ethicists: Historical Milestones and Their Impact on Professional Identity Formation.","authors":"Anita J Tarzian","doi":"10.1007/s10730-026-09589-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This paper explores how historical bioethics milestones have shaped the professional identity of clinical ethicists, discussing both the benefits and challenges of professionalizing the role of the clinical ethicist by comparing how a “wise counselor,” an ethics consultant, and a clinical ethicist provide healthcare ethics guidance. I examine the evolution of clinical ethics as a sub-category of bioethics, tracing its origins and key milestones in its development toward professionalization. These include the American Society for Bioethics and Humanities’ (ASBH) Core Competencies for Health Care Ethics Consultation reports, ASBH’s Code of Ethics and Professional Responsibilities for Healthcare Ethics Consultants, Fox et al.’s national surveys of healthcare ethics consultation in the United States, and the emergence of the Healthcare Ethics Consultant Certification (HEC-C) program. Practicing as a clinical ethicist requires mastery of a wide scope of knowledge, skills, and attitudes reflected in each stage of the field’s development. Reflecting on this history may yield clues for how clinical ethicists position themselves for the next phase of the field’s evolution.</p>","PeriodicalId":46160,"journal":{"name":"Hec Forum","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hec Forum","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10730-026-09589-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper explores how historical bioethics milestones have shaped the professional identity of clinical ethicists, discussing both the benefits and challenges of professionalizing the role of the clinical ethicist by comparing how a “wise counselor,” an ethics consultant, and a clinical ethicist provide healthcare ethics guidance. I examine the evolution of clinical ethics as a sub-category of bioethics, tracing its origins and key milestones in its development toward professionalization. These include the American Society for Bioethics and Humanities’ (ASBH) Core Competencies for Health Care Ethics Consultation reports, ASBH’s Code of Ethics and Professional Responsibilities for Healthcare Ethics Consultants, Fox et al.’s national surveys of healthcare ethics consultation in the United States, and the emergence of the Healthcare Ethics Consultant Certification (HEC-C) program. Practicing as a clinical ethicist requires mastery of a wide scope of knowledge, skills, and attitudes reflected in each stage of the field’s development. Reflecting on this history may yield clues for how clinical ethicists position themselves for the next phase of the field’s evolution.

从明智的咨询师到临床伦理学家:历史里程碑及其对职业认同形成的影响。
本文探讨了历史上的生物伦理学里程碑是如何塑造临床伦理学家的职业身份的,通过比较“明智的咨询师”、伦理咨询师和临床伦理学家如何提供医疗伦理指导,讨论了临床伦理学家专业化角色的好处和挑战。我检查临床伦理学的演变作为生物伦理学的一个子类,追踪其起源和关键里程碑在其向专业化发展。其中包括美国生命伦理与人文学会(ASBH)的《医疗伦理咨询核心能力报告》、ASBH的《医疗伦理顾问的道德规范和职业责任》、Fox等人在美国开展的医疗伦理咨询全国调查,以及医疗伦理顾问认证(hec)项目的出现。作为临床伦理学家的实践需要掌握广泛的知识、技能和态度,这些知识、技能和态度反映在该领域发展的每个阶段。对这段历史的反思可能会为临床伦理学家如何为该领域下一阶段的发展定位提供线索。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Hec Forum
Hec Forum ETHICS-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
13.30%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: HEC Forum is an international, peer-reviewed publication featuring original contributions of interest to practicing physicians, nurses, social workers, risk managers, attorneys, ethicists, and other HEC committee members. Contributions are welcomed from any pertinent source, but the text should be written to be appreciated by HEC members and lay readers. HEC Forum publishes essays, research papers, and features the following sections:Essays on Substantive Bioethical/Health Law Issues Analyses of Procedural or Operational Committee Issues Document Exchange Special Articles International Perspectives Mt./St. Anonymous: Cases and Institutional Policies Point/Counterpoint Argumentation Case Reviews, Analyses, and Resolutions Chairperson''s Section `Tough Spot'' Critical Annotations Health Law Alert Network News Letters to the Editors
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书