The pervasiveness of racism in healthcare facilities in Latin America: a scoping review.

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Arachu Castro, Martha Silva, Eva Silvestre
{"title":"The pervasiveness of racism in healthcare facilities in Latin America: a scoping review.","authors":"Arachu Castro, Martha Silva, Eva Silvestre","doi":"10.1093/heapol/czag050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Racism in healthcare facilities across Latin America systematically affects Indigenous, Afrodescendant, and migrant populations. Yet, no comprehensive synthesis has mapped its scope across different populations, healthcare settings, and countries in the region. This scoping review followed PRISMA guidelines and searched PubMed, EBSCOhost, and EMBASE for peer-reviewed studies published between January 2015 and June 2025. We included studies addressing racism in healthcare facilities where clinical encounters between populations and healthcare workers occur. Data were charted using AI-assisted tools and analyzed thematically. We retained 70 studies from 15 countries, predominantly Brazil (n = 30) and Mexico (n = 14). Racism manifested through three interconnected forms: institutional racism (policies restricting access, absence of data reflecting ethnic identification and racialization processes, resource inequities), personally mediated racism (verbal abuse, physical mistreatment, denial of culturally appropriate care), and internalized racism (self-devaluation, acceptance of mistreatment). These forms of discrimination pervade multiple medical fields, including maternal and reproductive health, mental health services, dental care, chronic disease management, infectious disease treatment, and emergency care. Racialized populations experience delayed diagnoses, inadequate treatment protocols, and systematic exclusion from preventive care. Language barriers, cultural dismissal, and discriminatory triage decisions compound these inequities. Intersectional marginalization based on gender, class, migration status, and sexuality amplifies these effects, producing multiplicative rather than additive health impacts. Achieving health equity requires dismantling institutional racism through meaningful community participation in healthcare governance, mandatory collection of ethno-local data-population descriptors reflecting local ethnic identification and racialization processes-integration of anti-racist and decolonial frameworks in medical education, legal accountability mechanisms, and recognition of racism as a fundamental determinant of health. Interventions targeting only individual bias will fail without addressing structural transformation.</p>","PeriodicalId":12926,"journal":{"name":"Health policy and planning","volume":" ","pages":"1018-1042"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13276266/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health policy and planning","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czag050","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Racism in healthcare facilities across Latin America systematically affects Indigenous, Afrodescendant, and migrant populations. Yet, no comprehensive synthesis has mapped its scope across different populations, healthcare settings, and countries in the region. This scoping review followed PRISMA guidelines and searched PubMed, EBSCOhost, and EMBASE for peer-reviewed studies published between January 2015 and June 2025. We included studies addressing racism in healthcare facilities where clinical encounters between populations and healthcare workers occur. Data were charted using AI-assisted tools and analyzed thematically. We retained 70 studies from 15 countries, predominantly Brazil (n = 30) and Mexico (n = 14). Racism manifested through three interconnected forms: institutional racism (policies restricting access, absence of data reflecting ethnic identification and racialization processes, resource inequities), personally mediated racism (verbal abuse, physical mistreatment, denial of culturally appropriate care), and internalized racism (self-devaluation, acceptance of mistreatment). These forms of discrimination pervade multiple medical fields, including maternal and reproductive health, mental health services, dental care, chronic disease management, infectious disease treatment, and emergency care. Racialized populations experience delayed diagnoses, inadequate treatment protocols, and systematic exclusion from preventive care. Language barriers, cultural dismissal, and discriminatory triage decisions compound these inequities. Intersectional marginalization based on gender, class, migration status, and sexuality amplifies these effects, producing multiplicative rather than additive health impacts. Achieving health equity requires dismantling institutional racism through meaningful community participation in healthcare governance, mandatory collection of ethno-local data-population descriptors reflecting local ethnic identification and racialization processes-integration of anti-racist and decolonial frameworks in medical education, legal accountability mechanisms, and recognition of racism as a fundamental determinant of health. Interventions targeting only individual bias will fail without addressing structural transformation.

拉丁美洲医疗机构中普遍存在的种族主义:范围审查。
拉丁美洲医疗机构中的种族主义系统性地影响着土著、非洲裔和移民人口。然而,目前还没有全面的综合分析将其范围映射到该地区不同的人口、医疗保健环境和国家。本综述遵循PRISMA指南,检索PubMed、EBSCOhost和EMBASE,检索2015年1月至2025年6月间发表的同行评议研究。我们纳入了在人群和医护人员发生临床接触的医疗机构中针对种族主义的研究。使用人工智能辅助工具绘制数据图表并进行主题分析。我们保留了来自15个国家的70项研究,主要是巴西(n=30)和墨西哥(n=14)。种族主义通过三种相互关联的形式表现出来:制度性种族主义(限制准入的政策、缺乏反映种族认同和种族化过程的数据、资源不平等)、个人介导的种族主义(言语虐待、身体虐待、拒绝文化上适当的照顾)和内化的种族主义(自我贬低、接受虐待)。这些形式的歧视普遍存在于多个医疗领域,包括孕产妇和生殖健康、精神健康服务、牙科保健、慢性病管理、传染病治疗和急诊护理。种族化的人群经历了诊断延迟、治疗方案不充分以及系统性地排除在预防保健之外。语言障碍、文化排斥和歧视性的分类决定加剧了这些不平等。基于性别、阶级、移民身份和性取向的交叉边缘化放大了这些影响,产生了多重而非累加的健康影响。要实现卫生公平,需要通过有意义的社区参与保健治理、强制收集反映当地族裔认同和种族化进程的族裔-地方数据——人口描述符、将反种族主义和非殖民主义框架纳入医学教育、法律问责机制以及承认种族主义是健康的一个基本决定因素,从而消除体制性种族主义。如果不解决结构转型问题,只针对个人偏见的干预措施将会失败。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health policy and planning
Health policy and planning 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
3.10%
发文量
98
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Health Policy and Planning publishes health policy and systems research focusing on low- and middle-income countries. Our journal provides an international forum for publishing original and high-quality research that addresses questions pertinent to policy-makers, public health researchers and practitioners. Health Policy and Planning is published 10 times a year.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书