Jon Bohlin, Yunsung Lee, Ida Henriette Caspersen, Anna Hayman Robertson, Christian M Page, Håkon K Gjessing, Astanand Jugessur, Per Magnus, Siri Mjaaland, Lill Trogstad
{"title":"Longitudinal study of genome-wide DNA methylation in individuals with and without post-acute symptoms following SARS-CoV-2 infection.","authors":"Jon Bohlin, Yunsung Lee, Ida Henriette Caspersen, Anna Hayman Robertson, Christian M Page, Håkon K Gjessing, Astanand Jugessur, Per Magnus, Siri Mjaaland, Lill Trogstad","doi":"10.1080/17501911.2026.2656361","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Symptoms following SARS-CoV-2 infection, referred to as Long-COVID, have been reported since the pandemic. We investigated whether COVID-19 or Long-COVID is associated with persistent genome-wide DNA methylation (DNAm) changes in whole blood using a longitudinal design.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>DNAm was measured using the Illumina EPIC V2 platform (859,651 CpGs) in 297 adult participants (594 samples in total) from two Norwegian population-based cohorts, with samples collected pre-infection (2020) and during the pandemic (2023). Participants were classified as Long-COVID, COVID-19 (no persistent symptoms), or not infected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant DNAm differences were observed between Long-COVID and not infected at either time point (<i>p</i> = 0.745(FDR)) or during the pandemic specifically (<i>p</i> = 0.629(FDR)). Likewise, no differences were detected between COVID-19 and not infected across both time points (<i>p</i> = 0.883(FDR)) or during the pandemic (<i>p</i> = 0.287(FDR)). Sex-stratified analyses of the X chromosome revealed no significant DNAm differences for Long-COVID or COVID-19 in males (both <i>p</i> = 0.999(FDR)) or females (both <i>p</i> = 0.999(FDR)). Epigenetic age acceleration was also evaluated using DunedinPACE (DP) and PhenoAge (PA), but no significant differences were detected for Long-COVID (<i>p</i> = 0.695 [DP], <i>p</i> = 0.528 [PA]) or COVID-19 (<i>p</i> = 0.624 [DP], <i>p</i> = 0.348 [PA]).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>No persistent epigenetic age- or DNAm based differences due to Long-COVID or SARS-CoV-2 infection were detected in our cohorts.</p>","PeriodicalId":11959,"journal":{"name":"Epigenomics","volume":" ","pages":"411-419"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13166194/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epigenomics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17501911.2026.2656361","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Symptoms following SARS-CoV-2 infection, referred to as Long-COVID, have been reported since the pandemic. We investigated whether COVID-19 or Long-COVID is associated with persistent genome-wide DNA methylation (DNAm) changes in whole blood using a longitudinal design.
Methods: DNAm was measured using the Illumina EPIC V2 platform (859,651 CpGs) in 297 adult participants (594 samples in total) from two Norwegian population-based cohorts, with samples collected pre-infection (2020) and during the pandemic (2023). Participants were classified as Long-COVID, COVID-19 (no persistent symptoms), or not infected.
Results: No significant DNAm differences were observed between Long-COVID and not infected at either time point (p = 0.745(FDR)) or during the pandemic specifically (p = 0.629(FDR)). Likewise, no differences were detected between COVID-19 and not infected across both time points (p = 0.883(FDR)) or during the pandemic (p = 0.287(FDR)). Sex-stratified analyses of the X chromosome revealed no significant DNAm differences for Long-COVID or COVID-19 in males (both p = 0.999(FDR)) or females (both p = 0.999(FDR)). Epigenetic age acceleration was also evaluated using DunedinPACE (DP) and PhenoAge (PA), but no significant differences were detected for Long-COVID (p = 0.695 [DP], p = 0.528 [PA]) or COVID-19 (p = 0.624 [DP], p = 0.348 [PA]).
Conclusion: No persistent epigenetic age- or DNAm based differences due to Long-COVID or SARS-CoV-2 infection were detected in our cohorts.
期刊介绍:
Epigenomics provides the forum to address the rapidly progressing research developments in this ever-expanding field; to report on the major challenges ahead and critical advances that are propelling the science forward. The journal delivers this information in concise, at-a-glance article formats – invaluable to a time constrained community.
Substantial developments in our current knowledge and understanding of genomics and epigenetics are constantly being made, yet this field is still in its infancy. Epigenomics provides a critical overview of the latest and most significant advances as they unfold and explores their potential application in the clinical setting.