Resource utilization of rural solid waste in China—A review

IF 2.3 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL
Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy Pub Date : 2026-03-26 Epub Date: 2025-12-22 DOI:10.1002/ep.70230
Xia Li, Chuan Shen
{"title":"Resource utilization of rural solid waste in China—A review","authors":"Xia Li,&nbsp;Chuan Shen","doi":"10.1002/ep.70230","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The rapid urbanization and rising living standards in rural China have led to a significant increase in rural solid waste (RSW) generation, posing substantial challenges to environmental sustainability and residents' quality of life. This study addresses a critical gap in integrated RSW management frameworks by synthesizing technological, economic, and governance dimensions. Through a systematic review methodology, this article examines the current state of RSW management in China, focusing on the types of waste generated, their inherent material and energy values, and existing management practices across diverse geographical contexts. The analysis reveals significant regional heterogeneity in waste composition and management capabilities, necessitating context-specific solutions. The comparative assessment of resource recovery methods—including anaerobic digestion, composting, thermal conversion, and material transformation—demonstrates that despite the existence of technical solutions, their implementation faces significant barriers, including economic viability, technical expertise, and policy coordination. The research proposes a novel integrated framework that aligns RSW management with China's ecological civilization goals through four interconnected pathways: intelligent information-based management, circular economy implementation, multi-stakeholder governance, and technological innovation. The findings of this review offer valuable insights and practical guidance for policymakers, researchers, and practitioners working toward sustainable rural development and effective solid waste management in China and other developing regions that face similar sustainability challenges.</p>","PeriodicalId":11701,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy","volume":"45 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://aiche.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ep.70230","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The rapid urbanization and rising living standards in rural China have led to a significant increase in rural solid waste (RSW) generation, posing substantial challenges to environmental sustainability and residents' quality of life. This study addresses a critical gap in integrated RSW management frameworks by synthesizing technological, economic, and governance dimensions. Through a systematic review methodology, this article examines the current state of RSW management in China, focusing on the types of waste generated, their inherent material and energy values, and existing management practices across diverse geographical contexts. The analysis reveals significant regional heterogeneity in waste composition and management capabilities, necessitating context-specific solutions. The comparative assessment of resource recovery methods—including anaerobic digestion, composting, thermal conversion, and material transformation—demonstrates that despite the existence of technical solutions, their implementation faces significant barriers, including economic viability, technical expertise, and policy coordination. The research proposes a novel integrated framework that aligns RSW management with China's ecological civilization goals through four interconnected pathways: intelligent information-based management, circular economy implementation, multi-stakeholder governance, and technological innovation. The findings of this review offer valuable insights and practical guidance for policymakers, researchers, and practitioners working toward sustainable rural development and effective solid waste management in China and other developing regions that face similar sustainability challenges.

中国农村固体废物资源化利用研究综述
中国农村的快速城市化和生活水平的提高导致农村固体废物(RSW)的产生显著增加,对环境的可持续性和居民的生活质量提出了重大挑战。本研究通过综合技术、经济和治理维度,解决了集成RSW管理框架中的一个关键差距。通过系统的回顾方法,本文研究了中国固体废物管理的现状,重点关注产生的废物类型,其固有的材料和能源价值,以及不同地理环境下的现有管理实践。分析显示,在废物组成和管理能力方面存在显著的区域差异,因此需要针对具体情况采取解决办法。对资源回收方法(包括厌氧消化、堆肥、热转化和材料转化)的比较评估表明,尽管存在技术解决方案,但它们的实施面临着重大障碍,包括经济可行性、技术专长和政策协调。该研究提出了一个新的集成框架,通过智能信息化管理、循环经济实施、多方利益相关者治理和技术创新四个相互关联的途径,使RSW管理与中国生态文明目标保持一致。本综述的研究结果为中国和其他面临类似可持续性挑战的发展中地区致力于农村可持续发展和有效固体废物管理的政策制定者、研究人员和实践者提供了宝贵的见解和实践指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy
Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy 环境科学-工程:化工
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
3.60%
发文量
231
审稿时长
4.3 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Progress , a quarterly publication of the American Institute of Chemical Engineers, reports on critical issues like remediation and treatment of solid or aqueous wastes, air pollution, sustainability, and sustainable energy. Each issue helps chemical engineers (and those in related fields) stay on top of technological advances in all areas associated with the environment through feature articles, updates, book and software reviews, and editorials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书