Constructing citizenship and indigeneity in Jordan: The politics of Bedouin rights and identities in cultural heritage sites

IF 3.1 3区 社会学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY
Geographical Journal Pub Date : 2026-03-08 Epub Date: 2025-05-14 DOI:10.1111/geoj.70010
Taraf Abu Hamdan, Olivia Mason
{"title":"Constructing citizenship and indigeneity in Jordan: The politics of Bedouin rights and identities in cultural heritage sites","authors":"Taraf Abu Hamdan,&nbsp;Olivia Mason","doi":"10.1111/geoj.70010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This paper explores the relationships between Bedouin rights, citizenship and indigeneity in cultural heritage sites in Jordan. State narratives in Jordan deny indigenous rights to Bedouin by claiming there are no indigenous populations. We use this denial as a starting point to explore two key questions. First, what drives this denial, and second, what does it reveal about indigeneity and citizenship tensions in Jordan? Bedouin in Jordan are narrated as Jordan's citizenry backbone and through frameworks that see them as a monolith. Yet experiences of Bedouin vary and many face displacement and dispossession. Indeed, in cultural heritage sites Bedouin are central to their legitimisation, while simultaneously their rights are not recognised. Through interviews and ethnographic fieldwork with Bedouin communities, we explore how tensions around citizenship, indigeneity and identity arise at the everyday level. We argue that a more critical engagement with indigeneity is necessary in Jordan. Without this, valuable indigenous knowledge, identities and rights risk being erased. Beyond our focus on Jordan, this paper makes broader contributions to debates on indigeneity and citizenship. We conclude by arguing that by applying the term indigenous to more diverse settings, and centring indigenous understandings of the term, we can reclaim its use from a grounded perspective and continue to refuse the way the term indigenous is used and narrated by colonial, postcolonial and settler-colonial states.</p>","PeriodicalId":48023,"journal":{"name":"Geographical Journal","volume":"192 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://rgs-ibg.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/geoj.70010","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geographical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://rgs-ibg.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/geoj.70010","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper explores the relationships between Bedouin rights, citizenship and indigeneity in cultural heritage sites in Jordan. State narratives in Jordan deny indigenous rights to Bedouin by claiming there are no indigenous populations. We use this denial as a starting point to explore two key questions. First, what drives this denial, and second, what does it reveal about indigeneity and citizenship tensions in Jordan? Bedouin in Jordan are narrated as Jordan's citizenry backbone and through frameworks that see them as a monolith. Yet experiences of Bedouin vary and many face displacement and dispossession. Indeed, in cultural heritage sites Bedouin are central to their legitimisation, while simultaneously their rights are not recognised. Through interviews and ethnographic fieldwork with Bedouin communities, we explore how tensions around citizenship, indigeneity and identity arise at the everyday level. We argue that a more critical engagement with indigeneity is necessary in Jordan. Without this, valuable indigenous knowledge, identities and rights risk being erased. Beyond our focus on Jordan, this paper makes broader contributions to debates on indigeneity and citizenship. We conclude by arguing that by applying the term indigenous to more diverse settings, and centring indigenous understandings of the term, we can reclaim its use from a grounded perspective and continue to refuse the way the term indigenous is used and narrated by colonial, postcolonial and settler-colonial states.

Abstract Image

在约旦构建公民身份和土著:贝都因人在文化遗产中的权利和身份政治
本文探讨了约旦文化遗产中贝都因人权利、公民身份和土著之间的关系。约旦的国家叙述否认贝都因人的土著权利,声称没有土著人口。我们以这种否认为出发点,探讨两个关键问题。首先,是什么推动了这种否认,其次,它揭示了约旦的土著和公民关系紧张的什么?约旦的贝都因人被描述为约旦的公民支柱,并通过将他们视为一个整体的框架。然而,贝都因人的经历各不相同,许多人面临流离失所和被剥夺。事实上,在文化遗产中,贝都因人是其合法化的核心,而与此同时,他们的权利却没有得到承认。通过与贝都因社区的访谈和民族志实地考察,我们探索了日常生活中围绕公民身份、土著和身份的紧张关系。我们认为,在约旦,有必要对土著进行更批判性的接触。如果不这样做,宝贵的土著知识、身份和权利就有可能被抹去。除了我们对约旦的关注之外,本文还对有关土著和公民身份的辩论做出了更广泛的贡献。最后,我们认为,通过将“土著”一词应用于更多样化的环境,并以土著对该术语的理解为中心,我们可以从一个扎根的角度重新使用它,并继续拒绝殖民、后殖民和移民-殖民国家使用和叙述“土著”一词的方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
3.30%
发文量
69
期刊介绍: The Geographical Journal has been the academic journal of the Royal Geographical Society, under the terms of the Royal Charter, since 1893. It publishes papers from across the entire subject of geography, with particular reference to public debates, policy-orientated agendas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书