Icarus’s perihelion advance explored through Newtonian and relativistic gravity, and the Vulcan hypothesis

IF 2.1 4区 物理与天体物理 Q3 ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
S. P. Pogossian
{"title":"Icarus’s perihelion advance explored through Newtonian and relativistic gravity, and the Vulcan hypothesis","authors":"S. P. Pogossian","doi":"10.1007/s10509-026-04570-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In this work, a comparative study of the perihelion precession of the inner planets is presented, considering both general relativity and Newtonian gravity extended to include a hypothetical planet, Vulcan, modeled as a planetary-mass primordial black hole located between Mercury and Venus. Two computational approaches are examined: the conventional method based on the secular evolution rate of the perihelion longitude and an alternative approach based on the rotation of the Laplace–Runge–Lenz vector. A Vulcan with a semi-major axis of 0.545 astronomical units and a mass approximately one-third that of Mercury reproduces the observed perihelion advances of Mercury, Earth, and Mars. However, it predicts a perihelion advance for the asteroid Icarus significantly larger than the relativistic value. As a planetary mass primordial black hole, Vulcan would be electromagnetically invisible, and its presence could only be inferred through gravitational perturbations. For Mercury, Earth, and Mars, the perihelion advances computed using both methods are mutually consistent within the Newtonian-plus-Vulcan framework and in general relativity. The analysis of Venus’s perihelion advance reveals large fluctuations, and it is therefore excluded from the study. For asteroid Icarus, the two methods yield divergent results: only the Laplace–Runge–Lenz vector approach produces values consistent with general relativity. These results demonstrate that the Laplace–Runge–Lenz vector method provides a reproducible and intuitive framework for calculating perihelion advance, capturing the effect as a rotation of a vector that directly points to the perihelion position, offering a straightforward and physically intuitive alternative to the traditional perihelion-longitude approach. The orbital motion of Icarus provides a particularly sensitive test for distinguishing between classical Newtonian dynamics extended to include a hypothetical Vulcan and relativistic predictions. A deeper understanding of the orbital dynamics of solar system bodies enables refinement of gravitational models in the inner solar system and more accurate predictions for near-Earth object trajectories.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8644,"journal":{"name":"Astrophysics and Space Science","volume":"371 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Astrophysics and Space Science","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10509-026-04570-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this work, a comparative study of the perihelion precession of the inner planets is presented, considering both general relativity and Newtonian gravity extended to include a hypothetical planet, Vulcan, modeled as a planetary-mass primordial black hole located between Mercury and Venus. Two computational approaches are examined: the conventional method based on the secular evolution rate of the perihelion longitude and an alternative approach based on the rotation of the Laplace–Runge–Lenz vector. A Vulcan with a semi-major axis of 0.545 astronomical units and a mass approximately one-third that of Mercury reproduces the observed perihelion advances of Mercury, Earth, and Mars. However, it predicts a perihelion advance for the asteroid Icarus significantly larger than the relativistic value. As a planetary mass primordial black hole, Vulcan would be electromagnetically invisible, and its presence could only be inferred through gravitational perturbations. For Mercury, Earth, and Mars, the perihelion advances computed using both methods are mutually consistent within the Newtonian-plus-Vulcan framework and in general relativity. The analysis of Venus’s perihelion advance reveals large fluctuations, and it is therefore excluded from the study. For asteroid Icarus, the two methods yield divergent results: only the Laplace–Runge–Lenz vector approach produces values consistent with general relativity. These results demonstrate that the Laplace–Runge–Lenz vector method provides a reproducible and intuitive framework for calculating perihelion advance, capturing the effect as a rotation of a vector that directly points to the perihelion position, offering a straightforward and physically intuitive alternative to the traditional perihelion-longitude approach. The orbital motion of Icarus provides a particularly sensitive test for distinguishing between classical Newtonian dynamics extended to include a hypothetical Vulcan and relativistic predictions. A deeper understanding of the orbital dynamics of solar system bodies enables refinement of gravitational models in the inner solar system and more accurate predictions for near-Earth object trajectories.

伊卡洛斯的近日点推进探索通过牛顿和相对论引力,火神假说
在这项工作中,提出了内行星近日点进动的比较研究,考虑到广义相对论和牛顿引力扩展到包括一个假设的行星,火神,模拟为行星质量的原始黑洞位于水星和金星之间。研究了两种计算方法:基于近日点经度长期演化速率的传统方法和基于拉普拉斯-龙格-伦茨矢量旋转的替代方法。火神星的半长轴为0.545天文单位,质量约为水星的三分之一,再现了水星、地球和火星的近日点推进。然而,它预测小行星伊卡洛斯的近日点推进比相对论值大得多。作为一个行星质量的原始黑洞,火神星在电磁上是不可见的,它的存在只能通过引力扰动来推断。对于水星、地球和火星,使用这两种方法计算的近日点提前在牛顿加火神框架和广义相对论中是相互一致的。对金星近日点推进的分析揭示了巨大的波动,因此它被排除在研究之外。对于小行星伊卡洛斯,这两种方法产生了不同的结果:只有拉普拉斯-龙格-伦茨向量方法产生的值与广义相对论一致。这些结果表明,拉普拉斯-龙格-伦茨矢量法为计算近日点推进提供了一个可重复的、直观的框架,捕捉了直接指向近日点位置的矢量旋转的效果,为传统的近日点-经度方法提供了一个直接的、物理上直观的替代方案。伊卡洛斯的轨道运动提供了一个特别敏感的测试,用于区分经典牛顿动力学扩展到包括假设的火神和相对论预测。对太阳系天体轨道动力学的更深入了解,可以改进太阳系内部的引力模型,更准确地预测近地天体的轨迹。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Astrophysics and Space Science
Astrophysics and Space Science 地学天文-天文与天体物理
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.30%
发文量
106
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Astrophysics and Space Science publishes original contributions and invited reviews covering the entire range of astronomy, astrophysics, astrophysical cosmology, planetary and space science and the astrophysical aspects of astrobiology. This includes both observational and theoretical research, the techniques of astronomical instrumentation and data analysis and astronomical space instrumentation. We particularly welcome papers in the general fields of high-energy astrophysics, astrophysical and astrochemical studies of the interstellar medium including star formation, planetary astrophysics, the formation and evolution of galaxies and the evolution of large scale structure in the Universe. Papers in mathematical physics or in general relativity which do not establish clear astrophysical applications will no longer be considered. The journal also publishes topically selected special issues in research fields of particular scientific interest. These consist of both invited reviews and original research papers. Conference proceedings will not be considered. All papers published in the journal are subject to thorough and strict peer-reviewing. Astrophysics and Space Science features short publication times after acceptance and colour printing free of charge.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书