The Validity of Measures in Specific Training According to BaLance Evaluation (STABLE) – An Exercise-based Approach to Balance Rehabilitation for Older Adults at Risk of Falling
Kasper Søndergaard, Carsten Bogh Juhl, Emilie Eskildsen Zwicky, Jesper Bencke, Per Caye-Thomasen, Derek John Curtis
{"title":"The Validity of Measures in Specific Training According to BaLance Evaluation (STABLE) – An Exercise-based Approach to Balance Rehabilitation for Older Adults at Risk of Falling","authors":"Kasper Søndergaard, Carsten Bogh Juhl, Emilie Eskildsen Zwicky, Jesper Bencke, Per Caye-Thomasen, Derek John Curtis","doi":"10.1007/s12126-026-09664-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p> Falls are a leading cause of injury and premature death among older adults. Specific Training According to BaLance Evaluation (STABLE) is a novel approach to balance rehabilitation that comprises six clinical measures applied to guide exercise prescription in rehabilitation. To evaluate the construct validity of the STABLE measures. Specific hypothesis regarding the measure’s correlations with reference measures of the balance domains that they purport to measure were tested in 103 older adults with balance impairment. The hypothesized correlations (<i>r</i> ≥ 0.3 and <i>r</i> ≥ 0.5) with key reference measures were confirmed for four measures. Minimum 7 of 10 hypothesized correlations (<i>r</i> < 0.1) with patient´s characteristics were confirmed for all measures but one. The correlations with patient reported balance disability and falls related to the construct that each measure purports to measure were lower than hypothesized for all measures (v = 0.102 to 0.325). The correlations with generic balance measures were as hypothesized for all measures except for one and the correlations between the measures were higher than hypothesized. All measures but one can validly be applied in the balance profile to measure balance disability and to guide rehabilitation.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":51665,"journal":{"name":"Ageing International","volume":"51 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12126-026-09664-w.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ageing International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12126-026-09664-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Falls are a leading cause of injury and premature death among older adults. Specific Training According to BaLance Evaluation (STABLE) is a novel approach to balance rehabilitation that comprises six clinical measures applied to guide exercise prescription in rehabilitation. To evaluate the construct validity of the STABLE measures. Specific hypothesis regarding the measure’s correlations with reference measures of the balance domains that they purport to measure were tested in 103 older adults with balance impairment. The hypothesized correlations (r ≥ 0.3 and r ≥ 0.5) with key reference measures were confirmed for four measures. Minimum 7 of 10 hypothesized correlations (r < 0.1) with patient´s characteristics were confirmed for all measures but one. The correlations with patient reported balance disability and falls related to the construct that each measure purports to measure were lower than hypothesized for all measures (v = 0.102 to 0.325). The correlations with generic balance measures were as hypothesized for all measures except for one and the correlations between the measures were higher than hypothesized. All measures but one can validly be applied in the balance profile to measure balance disability and to guide rehabilitation.
期刊介绍:
As a quarterly peer-reviewed journal that has existed for over three decades, Ageing International serves all professionals who deal with complex ageing issues. The journal is dedicated to improving the life of ageing populations worldwide through providing an intellectual forum for communicating common concerns, exchanging analyses and discoveries in scientific research, crystallizing significant issues, and offering recommendations in ageing-related service delivery and policy making. Besides encouraging the submission of high-quality research and review papers, Ageing International seeks to bring together researchers, policy analysts, and service program administrators who are committed to reducing the ''implementation gap'' between good science and effective service, between evidence-based protocol and culturally suitable programs, and between unique innovative solutions and generalizable policies. For significant issues that are common across countries, Ageing International will organize special forums for scholars and investigators from different disciplines to present their regional perspectives as well as to provide more comprehensive analysis. The editors strongly believe that such discourse has the potential to foster a wide range of coordinated efforts that will lead to improvements in the quality of life of older persons worldwide. Abstracted and Indexed in:
ABI/INFORM, Academic OneFile, Academic Search, CSA/Proquest, Current Abstracts, EBSCO, Ergonomics Abstracts, Expanded Academic, Gale, Google Scholar, Health Reference Center Academic, OCLC, PsychINFO, PsyARTICLES, SCOPUS, Social Science Abstracts, and Summon by Serial Solutions.