Effect of tool diameter and step size on deformation and microstructural response in robot-assisted incremental sheet forming of AA3003-O

IF 2.6 3区 材料科学 Q2 ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING
Radhe Shyam Bhasker, Ravi Prakash Singh, Parnika Shrivastava, Yogesh Kumar
{"title":"Effect of tool diameter and step size on deformation and microstructural response in robot-assisted incremental sheet forming of AA3003-O","authors":"Radhe Shyam Bhasker,&nbsp;Ravi Prakash Singh,&nbsp;Parnika Shrivastava,&nbsp;Yogesh Kumar","doi":"10.1007/s12289-026-02006-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Robot-assisted incremental sheet forming (RAISF) of AA3003-O aluminium sheets (0.56 mm) was investigated to quantify the combined influence of tool diameter and step size on geometric, mechanical and microstructural responses. Variable wall angle conical frusta (VWACF) were fabricated using three tool diameters (5, 10, 15 mm) and three step depths (0.1, 0.3, 0.5 mm). A software-based toolpath was generated in CATIA and executed via ROBOTDK on a six-axis industrial robot. Formability was assessed through limiting wall angle and forming limit curves obtained from circle-grid analysis; spring back was evaluated from the deviation between theoretical and measured cone depths; forming forces were recorded in situ using a dynamometer; surface roughness (Ra, Rq) was characterised by <b><i>scanning probe microscope</i></b> (SPM); and crystallite size evolution was quantified using <b><i>X-Ray diffraction (XRD)</i></b> with a Modified Scherrer Equation and Williamson–Hall analysis. The limiting wall angle increased with tool diameter (from 49–53° for 5 mm to 61–64° for 15 mm) and exhibited an optimum at ΔZ = 0.3 mm. Average vertical force increased with both tool diameter and step depth, reaching ~ 40 kgF for the 15 mm/0.5 mm condition. Surface roughness varied between Ra ≈ 0.23–0.53 μm depending on tool–step combination. XRD results showed crystallite refinement relative to the base material, with step depth and tool diameter jointly controlling the balance between strain hardening and dynamic recrystallisation.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":591,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Material Forming","volume":"19 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12289-026-02006-w.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Material Forming","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12289-026-02006-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Robot-assisted incremental sheet forming (RAISF) of AA3003-O aluminium sheets (0.56 mm) was investigated to quantify the combined influence of tool diameter and step size on geometric, mechanical and microstructural responses. Variable wall angle conical frusta (VWACF) were fabricated using three tool diameters (5, 10, 15 mm) and three step depths (0.1, 0.3, 0.5 mm). A software-based toolpath was generated in CATIA and executed via ROBOTDK on a six-axis industrial robot. Formability was assessed through limiting wall angle and forming limit curves obtained from circle-grid analysis; spring back was evaluated from the deviation between theoretical and measured cone depths; forming forces were recorded in situ using a dynamometer; surface roughness (Ra, Rq) was characterised by scanning probe microscope (SPM); and crystallite size evolution was quantified using X-Ray diffraction (XRD) with a Modified Scherrer Equation and Williamson–Hall analysis. The limiting wall angle increased with tool diameter (from 49–53° for 5 mm to 61–64° for 15 mm) and exhibited an optimum at ΔZ = 0.3 mm. Average vertical force increased with both tool diameter and step depth, reaching ~ 40 kgF for the 15 mm/0.5 mm condition. Surface roughness varied between Ra ≈ 0.23–0.53 μm depending on tool–step combination. XRD results showed crystallite refinement relative to the base material, with step depth and tool diameter jointly controlling the balance between strain hardening and dynamic recrystallisation.

刀具直径和步长对AA3003-O机器人辅助增量成形过程中变形和组织响应的影响
研究了AA3003-O铝板(0.56 mm)的机器人辅助增量成形(RAISF),量化了刀具直径和步长对几何、力学和微观组织响应的综合影响。采用三种刀具直径(5、10、15 mm)和三种台阶深度(0.1、0.3、0.5 mm)制备变壁角锥形锥台(VWACF)。在CATIA中生成了基于软件的刀具路径,并通过ROBOTDK在六轴工业机器人上执行。通过极限壁角和圆网格分析得到的成形极限曲线对成形性进行评价;根据理论锥深与实测锥深之间的偏差来评估回弹;用测功机就地记录成形力;用扫描探针显微镜(SPM)表征表面粗糙度(Ra, Rq);采用x射线衍射(XRD)、修正Scherrer方程和Williamson-Hall分析对晶粒尺寸的演变进行了量化。极限壁角随着刀具直径的增加而增加(从5 mm时的49-53°增加到15 mm时的61-64°),并在ΔZ = 0.3 mm时达到最佳。平均垂直力随刀具直径和台阶深度的增加而增加,在15mm /0.5 mm条件下达到~ 40 kgF。表面粗糙度在Ra≈0.23 ~ 0.53 μm之间随刀步组合的不同而变化。XRD结果表明,相对于基材,晶粒细化,阶梯深度和刀具直径共同控制了应变硬化和动态再结晶的平衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Material Forming
International Journal of Material Forming ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING-MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
4.20%
发文量
76
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal publishes and disseminates original research in the field of material forming. The research should constitute major achievements in the understanding, modeling or simulation of material forming processes. In this respect ‘forming’ implies a deliberate deformation of material. The journal establishes a platform of communication between engineers and scientists, covering all forming processes, including sheet forming, bulk forming, powder forming, forming in near-melt conditions (injection moulding, thixoforming, film blowing etc.), micro-forming, hydro-forming, thermo-forming, incremental forming etc. Other manufacturing technologies like machining and cutting can be included if the focus of the work is on plastic deformations. All materials (metals, ceramics, polymers, composites, glass, wood, fibre reinforced materials, materials in food processing, biomaterials, nano-materials, shape memory alloys etc.) and approaches (micro-macro modelling, thermo-mechanical modelling, numerical simulation including new and advanced numerical strategies, experimental analysis, inverse analysis, model identification, optimization, design and control of forming tools and machines, wear and friction, mechanical behavior and formability of materials etc.) are concerned.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书