Barriers to Women's Leadership in Nursing: A Rapid Evidence Assessment and Proposal for an Integrated Theoretical Framework.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Chiara Palazzo,Vincenza Giordano,Andrea Chirico,Teresa Rea,Assunta Guillari
{"title":"Barriers to Women's Leadership in Nursing: A Rapid Evidence Assessment and Proposal for an Integrated Theoretical Framework.","authors":"Chiara Palazzo,Vincenza Giordano,Andrea Chirico,Teresa Rea,Assunta Guillari","doi":"10.1111/jan.70570","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AIM(S)\r\nThis review analyses and synthesises the available evidence on the barriers limiting women's career advancement in nursing. It aims to identify effective interventions to promote gender equity in healthcare leadership through an integrated framework informed by Social Role Theory, Ambivalent Sexism Theory and Theory of Planned Behaviour.\r\n\r\nDESIGN\r\nRapid Evidence Assessment.\r\n\r\nDATA SOURCES\r\nThe search was conducted on the databases: PubMed, CINAHL Complete, MEDLINE, ApaPsycArticles, ApaPsycInfo between March and May 2025.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nThe Population-Exposure-Outcome framework guided the formulation of the research question. Two reviewers independently conducted screening, quality appraisal and data extraction.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nEight studies with heterogeneous research designs were included: four literature reviews, three quantitative studies and one qualitative study. The analysis identified four themes: (1) gender pay gap; (2) gender stereotypes and cultural expectations; (3) systemic barriers: organisational structures and institutional culture; (4) organisational strategies for gender equity and female leadership.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSION\r\nCareer advancement for female nurses is limited by systemic and internalised constraints that reinforce vertical segregation. Multilevel interventions are needed to dismantle structural inequalities and reshape gender norms within nursing leadership.\r\n\r\nIMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND/OR PATIENT CARE\r\nTargeted reforms, including transparent promotion criteria, structured mentoring, bias awareness training and inclusive organisational policies, are essential to promote leadership equity, improve workplace justice and foster a sustainable health system.\r\n\r\nIMPACT\r\nThis study addresses the persistent gender gap in nursing leadership, identifying systemic, cultural and individual barriers to women's career progression. Through a Rapid Evidence Assessment, it proposes a new multilevel theoretical framework. The results support policies and interventions to promote gender equity in nursing leadership.\r\n\r\nREPORTING METHODS\r\nThis review adheres to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines for reporting.\r\n\r\nPATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION\r\nNone.","PeriodicalId":54897,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advanced Nursing","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advanced Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.70570","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

AIM(S) This review analyses and synthesises the available evidence on the barriers limiting women's career advancement in nursing. It aims to identify effective interventions to promote gender equity in healthcare leadership through an integrated framework informed by Social Role Theory, Ambivalent Sexism Theory and Theory of Planned Behaviour. DESIGN Rapid Evidence Assessment. DATA SOURCES The search was conducted on the databases: PubMed, CINAHL Complete, MEDLINE, ApaPsycArticles, ApaPsycInfo between March and May 2025. METHODS The Population-Exposure-Outcome framework guided the formulation of the research question. Two reviewers independently conducted screening, quality appraisal and data extraction. RESULTS Eight studies with heterogeneous research designs were included: four literature reviews, three quantitative studies and one qualitative study. The analysis identified four themes: (1) gender pay gap; (2) gender stereotypes and cultural expectations; (3) systemic barriers: organisational structures and institutional culture; (4) organisational strategies for gender equity and female leadership. CONCLUSION Career advancement for female nurses is limited by systemic and internalised constraints that reinforce vertical segregation. Multilevel interventions are needed to dismantle structural inequalities and reshape gender norms within nursing leadership. IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND/OR PATIENT CARE Targeted reforms, including transparent promotion criteria, structured mentoring, bias awareness training and inclusive organisational policies, are essential to promote leadership equity, improve workplace justice and foster a sustainable health system. IMPACT This study addresses the persistent gender gap in nursing leadership, identifying systemic, cultural and individual barriers to women's career progression. Through a Rapid Evidence Assessment, it proposes a new multilevel theoretical framework. The results support policies and interventions to promote gender equity in nursing leadership. REPORTING METHODS This review adheres to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines for reporting. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION None.
妇女在护理中的领导障碍:一个快速的证据评估和建议一个综合的理论框架。
目的:本综述分析并综合了现有的关于限制女性护理职业发展障碍的证据。它旨在通过社会角色理论、矛盾性别歧视理论和计划行为理论的综合框架,确定有效的干预措施,促进医疗保健领导中的性别平等。设计快速证据评估。数据来源检索于PubMed, CINAHL Complete, MEDLINE, ApaPsycArticles, ApaPsycInfo数据库,检索时间为2025年3月至5月。方法以人群-暴露-结果框架指导研究问题的制定。两名审稿人独立进行筛选、质量评估和数据提取。结果共纳入8项异质性研究:4项文献综述、3项定量研究和1项定性研究。分析确定了四个主题:(1)性别薪酬差距;(2)性别刻板印象与文化期望;(3)制度性障碍:组织结构和制度文化;(4)性别平等与女性领导的组织战略。结论女性护士的职业发展受到系统和内部制约因素的制约,这些因素加剧了纵向隔离。需要采取多层次干预措施,消除结构性不平等,重塑护理领导层中的性别规范。对职业和/或患者护理的影响有针对性的改革,包括透明的晋升标准、结构化的指导、偏见意识培训和包容性的组织政策,对于促进领导公平、改善工作场所公正和促进可持续的卫生系统至关重要。本研究解决了护理领导中持续存在的性别差距,确定了阻碍女性职业发展的体制、文化和个人障碍。通过快速证据评估,提出了一个新的多层次理论框架。结果支持政策和干预措施,以促进性别平等护理领导。报告方法本综述遵循系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目指南进行报告。病人或公众捐款无。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
7.90%
发文量
369
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Advanced Nursing (JAN) contributes to the advancement of evidence-based nursing, midwifery and healthcare by disseminating high quality research and scholarship of contemporary relevance and with potential to advance knowledge for practice, education, management or policy. All JAN papers are required to have a sound scientific, evidential, theoretical or philosophical base and to be critical, questioning and scholarly in approach. As an international journal, JAN promotes diversity of research and scholarship in terms of culture, paradigm and healthcare context. For JAN’s worldwide readership, authors are expected to make clear the wider international relevance of their work and to demonstrate sensitivity to cultural considerations and differences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书