Implementation of a Community Doula-Hospital Partnership to Improve Access to Linguistically and Racially Concordant Doula Care for Black Birthing People

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Journal of midwifery & women's health Pub Date : 2026-08-11 Epub Date: 2026-04-09 DOI:10.1111/jmwh.70110
Sarah L. Goff MD, PhD, Neena Qasba MD, MPH, Autumn Versace CNM, DNP, Carly Detterman CNM, MSN, Liza Winston CNM, MSN, Laura Gebhardt BA, CCRP, Tanita Council CBS, BS, Laconia Fennell CLC, BSN, Laura Attanasio PhD
{"title":"Implementation of a Community Doula-Hospital Partnership to Improve Access to Linguistically and Racially Concordant Doula Care for Black Birthing People","authors":"Sarah L. Goff MD, PhD,&nbsp;Neena Qasba MD, MPH,&nbsp;Autumn Versace CNM, DNP,&nbsp;Carly Detterman CNM, MSN,&nbsp;Liza Winston CNM, MSN,&nbsp;Laura Gebhardt BA, CCRP,&nbsp;Tanita Council CBS, BS,&nbsp;Laconia Fennell CLC, BSN,&nbsp;Laura Attanasio PhD","doi":"10.1111/jmwh.70110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Racially and linguistically concordant doula care has reduced disparities in maternal morbidity and mortality rates for Black birthing people. This mixed-methods pilot implementation study assessed the feasibility of implementing and maintaining a novel partnership between a community doula organization led by 2 Black doulas and an urban academic tertiary care hospital.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance framework was used to design and evaluate implementation. Black birthing people were recruited from the hospital's midwifery and general obstetrician-gynecology practices. Partnership members selected the implementation strategies. Implementation outcomes were assessed through periodic clinician surveys of midwives, labor and delivery nurses, and physicians and through doula monthly check-ins, postbirth debriefs, and patient visit logs. Descriptive and comparative quantitative analyses were conducted for surveys and doula logs. Rapid qualitative analyses were conducted for open-ended survey responses, doula check-ins, and debriefs.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 51 of 55 patients enrolled in the study received doula services. Midwives expressed higher levels of acceptability and appropriateness of doula care on clinician surveys compared with labor and delivery nurses and physicians. Feasibility was high, but some clinicians demonstrated a lack of understanding of the doulas’ role in labor and birth. Fidelity for prenatal and postnatal visits was high (98% and 96.1%, respectively). A doula was physically present at 41 births and virtually present at 6 (N = 51). Reasons for not being present during the remaining 4 births included communication issues, precipitous births, and births at a facility other than the study site.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Discussion</h3>\n \n <p>This study demonstrates that implementation of a formal community doula-academic hospital partnership was largely feasible. Interprofessional education has the potential to improve physicians’ and labor and delivery nurses’ lower ratings of the appropriateness and acceptability of doula care compared with midwives’ ratings.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16468,"journal":{"name":"Journal of midwifery & women's health","volume":"71 4","pages":"600-609"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of midwifery & women's health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jmwh.70110","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Racially and linguistically concordant doula care has reduced disparities in maternal morbidity and mortality rates for Black birthing people. This mixed-methods pilot implementation study assessed the feasibility of implementing and maintaining a novel partnership between a community doula organization led by 2 Black doulas and an urban academic tertiary care hospital.

Methods

The Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance framework was used to design and evaluate implementation. Black birthing people were recruited from the hospital's midwifery and general obstetrician-gynecology practices. Partnership members selected the implementation strategies. Implementation outcomes were assessed through periodic clinician surveys of midwives, labor and delivery nurses, and physicians and through doula monthly check-ins, postbirth debriefs, and patient visit logs. Descriptive and comparative quantitative analyses were conducted for surveys and doula logs. Rapid qualitative analyses were conducted for open-ended survey responses, doula check-ins, and debriefs.

Results

A total of 51 of 55 patients enrolled in the study received doula services. Midwives expressed higher levels of acceptability and appropriateness of doula care on clinician surveys compared with labor and delivery nurses and physicians. Feasibility was high, but some clinicians demonstrated a lack of understanding of the doulas’ role in labor and birth. Fidelity for prenatal and postnatal visits was high (98% and 96.1%, respectively). A doula was physically present at 41 births and virtually present at 6 (N = 51). Reasons for not being present during the remaining 4 births included communication issues, precipitous births, and births at a facility other than the study site.

Discussion

This study demonstrates that implementation of a formal community doula-academic hospital partnership was largely feasible. Interprofessional education has the potential to improve physicians’ and labor and delivery nurses’ lower ratings of the appropriateness and acceptability of doula care compared with midwives’ ratings.

实施社区助产师-医院伙伴关系,以改善黑人产妇获得语言和种族上一致的助产师护理的机会。
导言:种族和语言上和谐的助产师护理减少了黑人产妇发病率和死亡率的差异。这项混合方法试点实施研究评估了由2名黑人助产师领导的社区助产师组织与城市三级学术医院之间实施和维持新型伙伴关系的可行性。方法:采用Reach、Effectiveness、Adoption、Implementation和Maintenance框架来设计和评价实施情况。黑人接生人员是从医院的助产科和普通妇产科部门招募的。伙伴关系成员选择了实施战略。通过对助产士、分娩护士和医生的定期临床调查,以及通过导乐每月检查、产后汇报和患者就诊记录来评估实施结果。对调查和导乐日志进行描述性和比较性定量分析。快速定性分析进行了开放式的调查回应,导乐检查,和汇报。结果:参与研究的55名患者中有51名接受了导乐服务。助产士在临床医生调查中表示,与分娩护士和医生相比,助产师护理的可接受性和适当性更高。可行性很高,但一些临床医生对助产师在分娩过程中的作用缺乏了解。产前和产后随访的保真度很高(分别为98%和96.1%)。在41次分娩时,助产师在场,在6次分娩时,助产师在场(N = 51)。在其余4例分娩中未出现的原因包括沟通问题、意外分娩和在研究地点以外的设施分娩。讨论:本研究表明,实施正式的社区杜拉-学术医院伙伴关系在很大程度上是可行的。跨专业教育有可能改善医生和分娩护士对助产师护理的适当性和可接受性的较低评分,与助产士的评分相比。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
7.40%
发文量
103
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Midwifery & Women''s Health (JMWH) is a bimonthly, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the publication of original research and review articles that focus on midwifery and women''s health. JMWH provides a forum for interdisciplinary exchange across a broad range of women''s health issues. Manuscripts that address midwifery, women''s health, education, evidence-based practice, public health, policy, and research are welcomed
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书