The Doctor's Doctor Is the Patient's Doctor: A Pilot Quality Improvement Study on Patient-Pathologist Consultations at a Single Institution.

IF 3.2
Katherine Drews-Elger, Merce Jorda, Melissa Stedman, Sophie Egea, Elena F Brachtel, Susan B Kesmodel, Jose M Net, Monica M Yepes, Carmen Gomez-Fernandez
{"title":"The Doctor's Doctor Is the Patient's Doctor: A Pilot Quality Improvement Study on Patient-Pathologist Consultations at a Single Institution.","authors":"Katherine Drews-Elger, Merce Jorda, Melissa Stedman, Sophie Egea, Elena F Brachtel, Susan B Kesmodel, Jose M Net, Monica M Yepes, Carmen Gomez-Fernandez","doi":"10.5858/arpa.2025-0433-OA","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context.—: </strong>Pathologists have traditionally worked behind the scenes, providing diagnostic information to clinicians. The 21st Century Cures Act grants patients immediate access to pathology reports, creating opportunities and challenges for patient-pathologist communication.</p><p><strong>Objective.—: </strong>To evaluate the feasibility, acceptance, educational value, and perceived impact of telehealth-based, language-concordant patient-pathologist consultations for patients with breast biopsies across the full diagnostic spectrum.</p><p><strong>Design.—: </strong>Prospective, single-institution quality improvement pilot study at a tertiary care cancer center involving a breast pathologist, 2 breast radiologists, 1 breast surgeon, and 1 pathology resident. Patients undergoing a breast biopsy were offered an optional 30-minute telehealth consultation with a breast pathologist and a pathology resident to review their findings and biopsy slides in their preferred language (English or Spanish). Postconsultation surveys assessed patient perceptions. Encounters were documented in pathology reports and shared with referring physicians.</p><p><strong>Results.—: </strong>Forty-three patients were offered the consultation and more than half elected to participate. Consultations spanned benign, premalignant, and malignant diagnoses and were integrated without disrupting existing care pathways. Surveys indicated high patient satisfaction, improved understanding of pathology results, and reduced anxiety. Patients valued slide review and direct discussion with the diagnosing pathologist. Telehealth delivery and language concordance were well received. Resident participation was acceptable and supported educational goals.</p><p><strong>Conclusions.—: </strong>Telehealth-based, language-concordant patient-pathologist consultations in breast pathology are feasible, well accepted, and enhance patient understanding. This model integrates into routine workflows, supports trainee education, and warrants broader evaluation as a scalable, patient-centered approach to diagnostic care.</p>","PeriodicalId":93883,"journal":{"name":"Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine","volume":" ","pages":"713-721"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5858/arpa.2025-0433-OA","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context.—: Pathologists have traditionally worked behind the scenes, providing diagnostic information to clinicians. The 21st Century Cures Act grants patients immediate access to pathology reports, creating opportunities and challenges for patient-pathologist communication.

Objective.—: To evaluate the feasibility, acceptance, educational value, and perceived impact of telehealth-based, language-concordant patient-pathologist consultations for patients with breast biopsies across the full diagnostic spectrum.

Design.—: Prospective, single-institution quality improvement pilot study at a tertiary care cancer center involving a breast pathologist, 2 breast radiologists, 1 breast surgeon, and 1 pathology resident. Patients undergoing a breast biopsy were offered an optional 30-minute telehealth consultation with a breast pathologist and a pathology resident to review their findings and biopsy slides in their preferred language (English or Spanish). Postconsultation surveys assessed patient perceptions. Encounters were documented in pathology reports and shared with referring physicians.

Results.—: Forty-three patients were offered the consultation and more than half elected to participate. Consultations spanned benign, premalignant, and malignant diagnoses and were integrated without disrupting existing care pathways. Surveys indicated high patient satisfaction, improved understanding of pathology results, and reduced anxiety. Patients valued slide review and direct discussion with the diagnosing pathologist. Telehealth delivery and language concordance were well received. Resident participation was acceptable and supported educational goals.

Conclusions.—: Telehealth-based, language-concordant patient-pathologist consultations in breast pathology are feasible, well accepted, and enhance patient understanding. This model integrates into routine workflows, supports trainee education, and warrants broader evaluation as a scalable, patient-centered approach to diagnostic care.

医生的医生就是病人的医生:一项对单一机构的病人-病理学家会诊质量改进的试点研究。
上下文。病理学家传统上在幕后工作,向临床医生提供诊断信息。《21世纪治愈法案》允许患者立即获得病理报告,为患者与病理学家的沟通创造了机会和挑战。-:评估基于远程医疗的、语言一致的患者-病理学家会诊对乳腺活检患者的可行性、接受度、教育价值和感知影响。-:前瞻性、单机构质量改进试点研究,在三级护理癌症中心进行,包括一名乳腺病理学家、两名乳腺放射科医生、一名乳腺外科医生和一名病理住院医师。接受乳腺活检的患者可选择与乳腺病理学家和病理学住院医师进行30分钟的远程医疗咨询,以他们首选的语言(英语或西班牙语)回顾他们的发现和活检切片。会诊后调查评估了患者的看法。就诊记录在病理报告中,并与转诊医师共享。-: 43名患者接受了咨询,超过一半的患者选择参加。咨询涵盖良性、癌前和恶性诊断,并在不破坏现有护理途径的情况下进行整合。调查显示患者满意度高,对病理结果的理解提高,焦虑减少。患者重视切片检查和与诊断病理学家的直接讨论。远程保健服务和语言协调受到好评。居民参与是可以接受的,并且支持教育目标。-:以远程保健为基础的、语言一致的乳腺病理学患者-病理学家会诊是可行的,被广泛接受,并增强了患者的理解。该模型集成到日常工作流程中,支持培训生教育,并保证作为可扩展的、以患者为中心的诊断护理方法进行更广泛的评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书