Predicting Momentary Suicidal Ideation From Smartphone Screenshots Using Vision-Language Models: Prospective Machine Learning Study.

IF 7.4 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Jmir Mental Health Pub Date : 2026-04-08 DOI:10.2196/90581
Ross Jacobucci, Wenpei Shao, Veronika Kobrinsky, Brooke Ammerman
{"title":"Predicting Momentary Suicidal Ideation From Smartphone Screenshots Using Vision-Language Models: Prospective Machine Learning Study.","authors":"Ross Jacobucci, Wenpei Shao, Veronika Kobrinsky, Brooke Ammerman","doi":"10.2196/90581","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Passive smartphone sensing shows promise for suicide prevention, but behavioral metadata (GPS, screen time, and accelerometry) often lacks the contextual information needed to detect acute psychological distress. Analyzing what people actually see, read, and type on their phones-rather than just usage patterns-may provide more proximal signals of risk.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to test whether vision-language models (VLMs) applied to passively captured smartphone screenshots can predict momentary suicidal ideation (SI).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seventy-nine adults with past month suicidal thoughts or behaviors completed ecological momentary assessments (EMA) over 28 days while screenshots were captured every 5 seconds during active phone use. We fine-tuned open-source VLMs (Qwen2.5-VL [Alibaba Cloud], LFM2-VL [Liquid AI]), and text-only models (Qwen3 [Alibaba Cloud]) to predict SI from screenshots captured in the 2 hours preceding each EMA. We evaluated performance with temporal and subject holdouts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analytic sample comprised 2.5 million screenshots from 70 participants. Temporal holdout models achieved strong discrimination at the EMA level (AUC=0.83; AUPRC=0.77), with image-based models outperforming text-only models (AUC=0.83 vs 0.79; 95% CI 0.003-0.07). Subject holdout generalization was near chance (AUC≈0.50), though a simple lexical screening method retained modest discrimination (AUC=0.62). Smaller models performed comparably to larger models, supporting feasible on-device deployment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Screen content predicts short-term SI with clinically meaningful accuracy when models are personalized but does not generalize across individuals. These findings support a 2-stage clinical architecture, coarse lexical screening for new patients, with personalized VLM-based monitoring after a calibration period. On-device inference may enable privacy-preserving deployment.</p>","PeriodicalId":48616,"journal":{"name":"Jmir Mental Health","volume":"13 ","pages":"e90581"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13061109/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jmir Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/90581","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Passive smartphone sensing shows promise for suicide prevention, but behavioral metadata (GPS, screen time, and accelerometry) often lacks the contextual information needed to detect acute psychological distress. Analyzing what people actually see, read, and type on their phones-rather than just usage patterns-may provide more proximal signals of risk.

Objective: This study aimed to test whether vision-language models (VLMs) applied to passively captured smartphone screenshots can predict momentary suicidal ideation (SI).

Methods: Seventy-nine adults with past month suicidal thoughts or behaviors completed ecological momentary assessments (EMA) over 28 days while screenshots were captured every 5 seconds during active phone use. We fine-tuned open-source VLMs (Qwen2.5-VL [Alibaba Cloud], LFM2-VL [Liquid AI]), and text-only models (Qwen3 [Alibaba Cloud]) to predict SI from screenshots captured in the 2 hours preceding each EMA. We evaluated performance with temporal and subject holdouts.

Results: The analytic sample comprised 2.5 million screenshots from 70 participants. Temporal holdout models achieved strong discrimination at the EMA level (AUC=0.83; AUPRC=0.77), with image-based models outperforming text-only models (AUC=0.83 vs 0.79; 95% CI 0.003-0.07). Subject holdout generalization was near chance (AUC≈0.50), though a simple lexical screening method retained modest discrimination (AUC=0.62). Smaller models performed comparably to larger models, supporting feasible on-device deployment.

Conclusions: Screen content predicts short-term SI with clinically meaningful accuracy when models are personalized but does not generalize across individuals. These findings support a 2-stage clinical architecture, coarse lexical screening for new patients, with personalized VLM-based monitoring after a calibration period. On-device inference may enable privacy-preserving deployment.

使用视觉语言模型预测智能手机截图的瞬间自杀意念:前瞻性机器学习研究。
背景:被动智能手机感应显示出预防自杀的希望,但行为元数据(GPS、屏幕时间和加速度计)往往缺乏检测急性心理困扰所需的上下文信息。分析人们在手机上实际看到、阅读和输入的内容——而不仅仅是使用模式——可能会提供更接近风险的信号。目的:本研究旨在验证视觉语言模型(VLMs)应用于被动捕获的智能手机屏幕截图是否可以预测瞬间自杀意念(SI)。方法:79名过去一个月有自杀想法或行为的成年人在28天内完成生态瞬间评估(EMA),并在积极使用手机时每5秒捕捉一次屏幕截图。我们对开源VLMs (Qwen2.5-VL[阿里云],LFM2-VL [Liquid AI])和纯文本模型(Qwen3[阿里云])进行了微调,以从每次EMA前2小时捕获的屏幕截图中预测SI。我们评估了暂时滞留者和被滞留者的表现。结果:分析样本包括来自70名参与者的250万张截图。时间抵抗模型在EMA水平上具有很强的辨别能力(AUC=0.83; AUPRC=0.77),基于图像的模型优于纯文本模型(AUC=0.83 vs 0.79; 95% CI 0.003-0.07)。受试者保留泛化接近机会(AUC≈0.50),而简单的词汇筛选方法保留了适度的区分(AUC=0.62)。小型模型的性能与大型模型相当,支持可行的设备上部署。结论:当模型个性化时,屏幕内容预测短期SI具有临床意义的准确性,但不能在个体中推广。这些发现支持两阶段临床架构,对新患者进行粗略的词汇筛查,并在校准期后进行个性化的基于vmm的监测。设备上的推断可以实现保护隐私的部署。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Jmir Mental Health
Jmir Mental Health Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
10.80
自引率
3.80%
发文量
104
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: JMIR Mental Health (JMH, ISSN 2368-7959) is a PubMed-indexed, peer-reviewed sister journal of JMIR, the leading eHealth journal (Impact Factor 2016: 5.175). JMIR Mental Health focusses on digital health and Internet interventions, technologies and electronic innovations (software and hardware) for mental health, addictions, online counselling and behaviour change. This includes formative evaluation and system descriptions, theoretical papers, review papers, viewpoint/vision papers, and rigorous evaluations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书