Paramedics' Decisions to Withhold Resuscitation in Traumatic Cardiac Arrest: Accuracy of Paramedic Assessments Compared with Autopsy Findings.

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Ritesh Koyya, Ciara O'Brien, Ian R Drennan, Sheldon Cheskes, Johannes von Vopelius-Feldt
{"title":"Paramedics' Decisions to Withhold Resuscitation in Traumatic Cardiac Arrest: Accuracy of Paramedic Assessments Compared with Autopsy Findings.","authors":"Ritesh Koyya, Ciara O'Brien, Ian R Drennan, Sheldon Cheskes, Johannes von Vopelius-Feldt","doi":"10.1080/10903127.2026.2655289","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Trauma remains the leading cause of death among Canadians under 45, with over 70% of these deaths occurring in the prehospital setting. In Ontario, Canada, paramedics' decision to initiate or withhold resuscitation in traumatic cardiac arrest (TCA) is governed by basic life support (BLS) and advanced life support (ALS) patient care standards. This study explores paramedics' decisions to withhold cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in cases of prehospital TCA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective review of case files relating to coroner investigations of prehospital TCA across two emergency medical services (EMS) covering a mixed urban/suburban region in Ontario, Canada, with a population of approximately 4.3 million people, from January 2018 to July 2022. We reviewed all deaths where EMS records were available in the death investigation files and where paramedics did not provide CPR. Paramedics' documentation of reasons to withhold CPR was reviewed and compared to postmortem findings. Descriptive statistics were used to describe the findings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 90 cases of prehospital TCA where no CPR was provided by paramedics. Of these, 55 cases (61%) had documented, injuries incompatible with life (decapitation, open head or torso wounds with visible outpouring of brain or abdominal contents) or signs of irreversible death (rigor mortis, lividity, decomposition). Postmortem examination confirmed paramedics' findings of injuries incompatible with life in 29 cases (89%). For the remaining 35 cases (39%), CPR was withheld due to a combination of prolonged time from TCA to EMS contact, severity of injuries deemed non-survivable, significant external blood loss, and following remote physician agreement in 31 (89%) cases. Of these, 29 (83%) had postmortem findings demonstrating anatomical injuries that made the TCA irreversible.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The majority of decisions to withhold CPR in prehospital TCA cases are based on signs that are clearly incompatible with life, identified by paramedics with high specificity. In the absence of such findings, paramedics consider factors like prolonged time intervals, overall injury severity, and seek guidance through remote physician supervision before deciding whether to withhold resuscitation efforts.</p>","PeriodicalId":20336,"journal":{"name":"Prehospital Emergency Care","volume":" ","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prehospital Emergency Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10903127.2026.2655289","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Trauma remains the leading cause of death among Canadians under 45, with over 70% of these deaths occurring in the prehospital setting. In Ontario, Canada, paramedics' decision to initiate or withhold resuscitation in traumatic cardiac arrest (TCA) is governed by basic life support (BLS) and advanced life support (ALS) patient care standards. This study explores paramedics' decisions to withhold cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in cases of prehospital TCA.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of case files relating to coroner investigations of prehospital TCA across two emergency medical services (EMS) covering a mixed urban/suburban region in Ontario, Canada, with a population of approximately 4.3 million people, from January 2018 to July 2022. We reviewed all deaths where EMS records were available in the death investigation files and where paramedics did not provide CPR. Paramedics' documentation of reasons to withhold CPR was reviewed and compared to postmortem findings. Descriptive statistics were used to describe the findings.

Results: We identified 90 cases of prehospital TCA where no CPR was provided by paramedics. Of these, 55 cases (61%) had documented, injuries incompatible with life (decapitation, open head or torso wounds with visible outpouring of brain or abdominal contents) or signs of irreversible death (rigor mortis, lividity, decomposition). Postmortem examination confirmed paramedics' findings of injuries incompatible with life in 29 cases (89%). For the remaining 35 cases (39%), CPR was withheld due to a combination of prolonged time from TCA to EMS contact, severity of injuries deemed non-survivable, significant external blood loss, and following remote physician agreement in 31 (89%) cases. Of these, 29 (83%) had postmortem findings demonstrating anatomical injuries that made the TCA irreversible.

Conclusions: The majority of decisions to withhold CPR in prehospital TCA cases are based on signs that are clearly incompatible with life, identified by paramedics with high specificity. In the absence of such findings, paramedics consider factors like prolonged time intervals, overall injury severity, and seek guidance through remote physician supervision before deciding whether to withhold resuscitation efforts.

在创伤性心脏骤停中,护理人员决定停止复苏:与尸检结果相比,护理人员评估的准确性。
目的:创伤仍然是45岁以下加拿大人死亡的主要原因,其中70%以上的死亡发生在院前。在加拿大安大略省,护理人员决定在创伤性心脏骤停(TCA)中启动或停止复苏是由基本生命支持(BLS)和高级生命支持(ALS)患者护理标准决定的。本研究探讨院前TCA病例中医护人员拒绝心肺复苏(CPR)的决定。方法:我们对2018年1月至2022年7月期间加拿大安大略省两个紧急医疗服务中心(EMS)的院前TCA验尸官调查相关案件档案进行了回顾性分析,该中心覆盖了一个城市/郊区混合地区,人口约430万。我们审查了死亡调查档案中有EMS记录和护理人员未提供心肺复苏术的所有死亡病例。对医护人员拒绝进行心肺复苏术的原因文件进行了审查,并与尸检结果进行了比较。描述性统计用于描述研究结果。结果:我们确定了90例院前TCA,其中没有医护人员提供心肺复苏术。其中,55例(61%)记录了与生命不符的伤害(斩首、头部或躯干开放性伤口,可见脑或腹部内容物流出)或不可逆转的死亡迹象(尸僵、尸斑、腐烂)。尸检证实了29例(89%)护理人员发现的与生命不符的损伤。对于其余35例(39%),由于从TCA到EMS接触时间过长,严重的损伤被认为无法生存,严重的外部失血,以及31例(89%)的远程医生同意,因此不进行心肺复苏术。其中29例(83%)的尸检结果显示解剖损伤使TCA不可逆。结论:院前TCA病例中,大多数决定不进行心肺复苏术是基于明显与生命不相容的体征,由护理人员高度特异性地识别。在没有这些发现的情况下,护理人员会考虑诸如延长时间间隔、整体损伤严重程度等因素,并在决定是否停止复苏之前寻求远程医生监督的指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Prehospital Emergency Care
Prehospital Emergency Care 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
137
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Prehospital Emergency Care publishes peer-reviewed information relevant to the practice, educational advancement, and investigation of prehospital emergency care, including the following types of articles: Special Contributions - Original Articles - Education and Practice - Preliminary Reports - Case Conferences - Position Papers - Collective Reviews - Editorials - Letters to the Editor - Media Reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书