Regulatory policies for online alcohol access control: a comparative scoping review of international approaches.

IF 2.6 Q4 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
Wiwat Sungkhabut, Kaitsuda Saiprom, Chalermporn Devahastin Na Ayudhya, Saowanee Viboonsanti, Pasitpon Vatcharavongvan
{"title":"Regulatory policies for online alcohol access control: a comparative scoping review of international approaches.","authors":"Wiwat Sungkhabut, Kaitsuda Saiprom, Chalermporn Devahastin Na Ayudhya, Saowanee Viboonsanti, Pasitpon Vatcharavongvan","doi":"10.4082/kjfm.25.0122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The rapid growth of online alcohol sales, delivery services, and digital marketing has increased alcohol availability and heightened public health concerns, particularly among adolescents. However, regulatory responses remain inconsistent and vary significantly across regions. This scoping review synthesizes global regulatory approaches to online alcohol access, encompassing both established Western models and emerging Asian frameworks, and identifies key cross-national patterns and policy gaps. This scoping review followed PRISMA-ScR (preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses extension for scoping reviews) and Joanna Briggs Institute guidance. Searches of four electronic databases were complemented by a supplementary gray literature search targeting specific Asian jurisdictions to minimize geographic bias. The identified sources included policies and peer-reviewed studies on online alcohol sales, delivery practices, age-verification procedures, and digital marketing regulations. Data were systematically organized by regulatory domain and analyzed using a comparative socio-political framework (liberalism vs. paternalism) to interpret cross-national differences. The analysis of 34 documents across five regulatory domains revealed a distinct global divide. Western nations predominantly rely on co-regulatory models that frequently suffer from significant enforcement gaps, whereas Asian jurisdictions employ strict structural barriers. These include mandatory digital real-name authentication, \"Smart Order\" systems, and joint platform liability, designed to effectively restrict underage access where Western self-regulation has historically failed. To address global enforcement gaps, future policies must evolve from \"soft\" co-regulation to \"hard\" technical mandates. Integrating Asian-style digital identity systems with strict platform liability offers a viable pathway to effectively restrict underage access and reduce alcohol-related harm.</p>","PeriodicalId":17893,"journal":{"name":"Korean Journal of Family Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Journal of Family Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4082/kjfm.25.0122","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The rapid growth of online alcohol sales, delivery services, and digital marketing has increased alcohol availability and heightened public health concerns, particularly among adolescents. However, regulatory responses remain inconsistent and vary significantly across regions. This scoping review synthesizes global regulatory approaches to online alcohol access, encompassing both established Western models and emerging Asian frameworks, and identifies key cross-national patterns and policy gaps. This scoping review followed PRISMA-ScR (preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses extension for scoping reviews) and Joanna Briggs Institute guidance. Searches of four electronic databases were complemented by a supplementary gray literature search targeting specific Asian jurisdictions to minimize geographic bias. The identified sources included policies and peer-reviewed studies on online alcohol sales, delivery practices, age-verification procedures, and digital marketing regulations. Data were systematically organized by regulatory domain and analyzed using a comparative socio-political framework (liberalism vs. paternalism) to interpret cross-national differences. The analysis of 34 documents across five regulatory domains revealed a distinct global divide. Western nations predominantly rely on co-regulatory models that frequently suffer from significant enforcement gaps, whereas Asian jurisdictions employ strict structural barriers. These include mandatory digital real-name authentication, "Smart Order" systems, and joint platform liability, designed to effectively restrict underage access where Western self-regulation has historically failed. To address global enforcement gaps, future policies must evolve from "soft" co-regulation to "hard" technical mandates. Integrating Asian-style digital identity systems with strict platform liability offers a viable pathway to effectively restrict underage access and reduce alcohol-related harm.

在线酒精获取控制的监管政策:对国际办法范围的比较审查。
在线酒类销售、配送服务和数字营销的快速增长增加了酒类的可得性,并加剧了公共卫生问题,特别是在青少年中。然而,监管反应仍然不一致,各地区差异很大。这一范围审查综合了全球在线获取酒精的监管方法,包括已建立的西方模式和新兴的亚洲框架,并确定了关键的跨国模式和政策差距。该范围审查遵循PRISMA-ScR(系统审查的首选报告项目和范围审查的元分析扩展)和Joanna Briggs研究所的指导。对四个电子数据库进行了检索,并针对特定的亚洲司法管辖区进行了补充灰色文献检索,以尽量减少地理偏差。确定的来源包括有关在线酒精销售、配送实践、年龄验证程序和数字营销法规的政策和同行评议研究。数据按监管领域系统组织,并使用比较社会政治框架(自由主义与家长制)进行分析,以解释跨国差异。对5个监管领域34份文件的分析揭示了明显的全球鸿沟。西方国家主要依赖共同监管模式,这种模式往往存在严重的执法缺口,而亚洲司法管辖区则采用严格的结构性壁垒。这些措施包括强制数字实名认证、“智能订单”系统和联合平台责任,旨在有效限制未成年人访问西方自我监管历来失败的领域。为了解决全球执法差距,未来的政策必须从“软”的共同监管演变为“硬”的技术授权。将亚洲风格的数字身份系统与严格的平台责任相结合,为有效限制未成年人使用和减少酒精相关伤害提供了一条可行的途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Korean Journal of Family Medicine
Korean Journal of Family Medicine PRIMARY HEALTH CARE-
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
4.30%
发文量
51
审稿时长
53 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书