Prognostication of Liver Disease Patients via the WFUMB ‘Rule-of-4’ Algorithm Using SSI-2D-SWE-Based Liver Stiffness Measurement

IF 5.2 2区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Christian Sebesta, Georg Kramer, Nina Dominik, Benedikt S. Hofer, Lorenz Balcar, Paul Thöne, Mathias Jachs, Lukas Hartl, Benedikt Simbrunner, Till Schöchtner, Friedrich Haimberger, Nicolas Balutsch, Albert F. Stättermayer, Michael Trauner, Mattias Mandorfer, Thomas Reiberger, David J. M. Bauer
{"title":"Prognostication of Liver Disease Patients via the WFUMB ‘Rule-of-4’ Algorithm Using SSI-2D-SWE-Based Liver Stiffness Measurement","authors":"Christian Sebesta,&nbsp;Georg Kramer,&nbsp;Nina Dominik,&nbsp;Benedikt S. Hofer,&nbsp;Lorenz Balcar,&nbsp;Paul Thöne,&nbsp;Mathias Jachs,&nbsp;Lukas Hartl,&nbsp;Benedikt Simbrunner,&nbsp;Till Schöchtner,&nbsp;Friedrich Haimberger,&nbsp;Nicolas Balutsch,&nbsp;Albert F. Stättermayer,&nbsp;Michael Trauner,&nbsp;Mattias Mandorfer,&nbsp;Thomas Reiberger,&nbsp;David J. M. Bauer","doi":"10.1111/liv.70614","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>The World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology (WFUMB) guidance update 2024 proposed a ‘rule-of-4’ using ARFI liver stiffness measurement (LSM) to stratify the risk of decompensation events. This rule identifies advanced chronic liver disease (ACLD) at a threshold of ≥ 13 kPa and indicates a high probability of clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH) above 21 kPa.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We prospectively enrolled 187 patients undergoing same-day SSI-2D-LSM (Aixplorer SuperSonic Imagine) and hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) measurement. Patients were stratified into three LSM groups &lt; 13 kPa, 13–21 kPa and &gt; 21 kPa and followed for decompensation events for 1 year (Y1).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The cohort comprised 31 (16.6%) patients with LSM &lt; 13 kPa (non-ACLD); 33 (17.6%) LSM 13–21 kPa (ACLD) and 123 (65.8%) LSM &gt; 21 kPa (high CSPH probability). The corresponding median HVPG values were 5 [IQR: 3–7] vs. 10 [7–14] vs. 17 [13–21] mmHg, respectively, and the corresponding CSPH prevalence was 6.5%, 54.5% and 91.9%. In ROC analysis to predict CSPH, SSI-2D-LSM demonstrated high accuracy (AUC: 0.83). Validating the new WFUMB extension of the ‘rule-of-4’, the recommended &gt; 21 kPa threshold identified CSPH with a specificity of 80.0% and a PPV of 83.1%. In competing risk analysis, the Y1-decompensation rate was 0%, 10% and 24.7% of patients in the &lt; 13 kPa, 13–21 kPa and &gt; 21 kPa groups, respectively. For prediction of Y1-decompensation risk in the compensated ACLD (cACLD) subgroup, HVPG demonstrated the highest predictive accuracy (AUC: 0.92), while SSI-2D-LSM (AUC: 0.75) performed similarly to vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE: AUC: 0.77; AUC-comparison: <i>p</i> = 0.837).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The WFUMB ‘rule-of-4’ for ARFI-LSM allows for accurate and point-of-care non-invasive risk stratification of patients with liver disease. Specifically, the short-term risk of decompensation starts at SSI-2D-LSM ≥ 13 kPa and becomes considerable at SSI-2D-LSM &gt; 21 kPa (indicating high CSPH probability). These findings support the broader implementation of ARFI-LSM for risk assessment in clinical routine.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":18101,"journal":{"name":"Liver International","volume":"46 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13063207/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Liver International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/liv.70614","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology (WFUMB) guidance update 2024 proposed a ‘rule-of-4’ using ARFI liver stiffness measurement (LSM) to stratify the risk of decompensation events. This rule identifies advanced chronic liver disease (ACLD) at a threshold of ≥ 13 kPa and indicates a high probability of clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH) above 21 kPa.

Methods

We prospectively enrolled 187 patients undergoing same-day SSI-2D-LSM (Aixplorer SuperSonic Imagine) and hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) measurement. Patients were stratified into three LSM groups < 13 kPa, 13–21 kPa and > 21 kPa and followed for decompensation events for 1 year (Y1).

Results

The cohort comprised 31 (16.6%) patients with LSM < 13 kPa (non-ACLD); 33 (17.6%) LSM 13–21 kPa (ACLD) and 123 (65.8%) LSM > 21 kPa (high CSPH probability). The corresponding median HVPG values were 5 [IQR: 3–7] vs. 10 [7–14] vs. 17 [13–21] mmHg, respectively, and the corresponding CSPH prevalence was 6.5%, 54.5% and 91.9%. In ROC analysis to predict CSPH, SSI-2D-LSM demonstrated high accuracy (AUC: 0.83). Validating the new WFUMB extension of the ‘rule-of-4’, the recommended > 21 kPa threshold identified CSPH with a specificity of 80.0% and a PPV of 83.1%. In competing risk analysis, the Y1-decompensation rate was 0%, 10% and 24.7% of patients in the < 13 kPa, 13–21 kPa and > 21 kPa groups, respectively. For prediction of Y1-decompensation risk in the compensated ACLD (cACLD) subgroup, HVPG demonstrated the highest predictive accuracy (AUC: 0.92), while SSI-2D-LSM (AUC: 0.75) performed similarly to vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE: AUC: 0.77; AUC-comparison: p = 0.837).

Conclusions

The WFUMB ‘rule-of-4’ for ARFI-LSM allows for accurate and point-of-care non-invasive risk stratification of patients with liver disease. Specifically, the short-term risk of decompensation starts at SSI-2D-LSM ≥ 13 kPa and becomes considerable at SSI-2D-LSM > 21 kPa (indicating high CSPH probability). These findings support the broader implementation of ARFI-LSM for risk assessment in clinical routine.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

基于ssi - 2d - sw的肝脏硬度测量,通过WFUMB“Rule-of-4”算法预测肝病患者
背景:世界超声医学与生物学联合会(WFUMB) 2024年指南更新提出了使用ARFI肝刚度测量(LSM)对失代偿事件风险进行分层的“4规则”。该规则在阈值≥13 kPa时识别晚期慢性肝病(ACLD),并提示临床上显著的门脉高压(CSPH)高于21 kPa的可能性很大。方法:我们前瞻性地纳入187例患者,在同一天进行SSI-2D-LSM (aiexplorer超声成像)和肝静脉压梯度(HVPG)测量。将患者分为3个LSM组(21 kPa),随访1年(Y1)。结果:该队列包括31例(16.6%)LSM 21 kPa(高CSPH概率)患者。相应的HVPG中位数分别为5 [IQR: 3-7]、10[7-14]、17 [13-21]mmHg,相应的CSPH患病率分别为6.5%、54.5%和91.9%。在预测CSPH的ROC分析中,SSI-2D-LSM显示出较高的准确度(AUC: 0.83)。验证WFUMB对“4规则”的新扩展,推荐的bbbb21 kPa阈值识别CSPH的特异性为80.0%,PPV为83.1%。在竞争风险分析中,21 kPa组患者的l1失代偿率分别为0%、10%和24.7%。对于代偿ACLD (cACLD)亚组中l1失代偿风险的预测,HVPG表现出最高的预测精度(AUC: 0.92),而si - 2d - lsm (AUC: 0.75)与振动控制瞬态弹性成像(VCTE: AUC: 0.77; AUC-comparison: p = 0.837)相似。结论:WFUMB ARFI-LSM的“4规则”允许对肝病患者进行准确和即时的无创风险分层。其中,短期失代偿风险在SSI-2D-LSM≥13 kPa时开始,在SSI-2D-LSM > 21 kPa时变得相当大(CSPH概率较高)。这些发现支持在临床常规中更广泛地实施ARFI-LSM进行风险评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Liver International
Liver International 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
13.90
自引率
4.50%
发文量
348
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Liver International promotes all aspects of the science of hepatology from basic research to applied clinical studies. Providing an international forum for the publication of high-quality original research in hepatology, it is an essential resource for everyone working on normal and abnormal structure and function in the liver and its constituent cells, including clinicians and basic scientists involved in the multi-disciplinary field of hepatology. The journal welcomes articles from all fields of hepatology, which may be published as original articles, brief definitive reports, reviews, mini-reviews, images in hepatology and letters to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书